Skip to main content

Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
TagsGame Engines

Results

22 entries were submitted between 2025-09-08 00:00:00 and 2025-09-15 00:00:00. 147 ratings were given to 21 entries (95.5%) between 2025-09-15 00:00:00 and 2025-09-22 00:00:10. The average number of ratings per game was 6.7 and the median was 6.

And 2 We Are

by MigueBC

Ranked 4th in User experience - How well was the user interaction implemented. with 10 ratings (Score: 3.900)

View submission page

CriteriaRankScore*Raw Score
Theme incorporation - How well did the entry fit the theme.#24.8004.800
User experience - How well was the user interaction implemented.#43.9003.900
Overall#43.6173.617
Fun factor - How much fun was the entry to play.#54.0004.000
Haptics - Did the entry make good use of haptics?#62.2002.200
Audio - Did the entry make good use of audio?#113.2003.200
Originality - How original was the entry.#113.6003.600

Army of Two

by Turkheim

Ranked 7th in User experience - How well was the user interaction implemented. with 8 ratings (Score: 3.500)

View submission page

CriteriaRankScore*Raw Score
Theme incorporation - How well did the entry fit the theme.#44.6254.625
Fun factor - How much fun was the entry to play.#63.5003.500
User experience - How well was the user interaction implemented.#73.5003.500
Originality - How original was the entry.#73.8753.875
Overall#93.2713.271
Haptics - Did the entry make good use of haptics?#101.8751.875
Audio - Did the entry make good use of audio?#172.2502.250

Crystal Bastion

by request

Ranked 7th in User experience - How well was the user interaction implemented. with 6 ratings (Score: 3.500)

View submission page

CriteriaRankScore*Raw Score
Haptics - Did the entry make good use of haptics?#13.0003.000
Audio - Did the entry make good use of audio?#43.6673.667
Overall#63.4443.444
User experience - How well was the user interaction implemented.#73.5003.500
Theme incorporation - How well did the entry fit the theme.#104.0004.000
Fun factor - How much fun was the entry to play.#103.1673.167
Originality - How original was the entry.#133.3333.333

trenchline

by squid_iwl

Ranked 9th in User experience - How well was the user interaction implemented. with 5 ratings (Score: 3.469)

View submission page

CriteriaRankScore*Raw Score
User experience - How well was the user interaction implemented.#93.4693.800
Fun factor - How much fun was the entry to play.#132.9213.200
Audio - Did the entry make good use of audio?#152.5562.800
Haptics - Did the entry make good use of haptics?#180.9131.000
Overall#182.2522.467
Originality - How original was the entry.#202.0082.200
Theme incorporation - How well did the entry fit the theme.#201.6431.800

Wintermute

by Effiayre

Ranked 11th in User experience - How well was the user interaction implemented. with 9 ratings (Score: 3.333)

View submission page

CriteriaRankScore*Raw Score
Fun factor - How much fun was the entry to play.#73.3333.333
User experience - How well was the user interaction implemented.#113.3333.333
Audio - Did the entry make good use of audio?#123.1113.111
Haptics - Did the entry make good use of haptics?#141.2221.222
Overall#152.7222.722
Originality - How original was the entry.#172.7782.778
Theme incorporation - How well did the entry fit the theme.#172.5562.556

Shoot for 2

by MikeFrom1974

Ranked 15th in User experience - How well was the user interaction implemented. with 5 ratings (Score: 2.921)

View submission page

CriteriaRankScore*Raw Score
Fun factor - How much fun was the entry to play.#132.9213.200
User experience - How well was the user interaction implemented.#152.9213.200
Haptics - Did the entry make good use of haptics?#151.0951.200
Audio - Did the entry make good use of audio?#182.1912.400
Theme incorporation - How well did the entry fit the theme.#201.6431.800
Originality - How original was the entry.#202.0082.200
Overall#202.1302.333

Good Pop, Bad Pop

by henchao

Ranked 16th in User experience - How well was the user interaction implemented. with 6 ratings (Score: 2.833)

View submission page

CriteriaRankScore*Raw Score
Originality - How original was the entry.#34.3334.333
Audio - Did the entry make good use of audio?#83.3333.333
Theme incorporation - How well did the entry fit the theme.#123.6673.667
Overall#123.0283.028
Haptics - Did the entry make good use of haptics?#131.6671.667
User experience - How well was the user interaction implemented.#162.8332.833
Fun factor - How much fun was the entry to play.#202.3332.333

It Takes Two

by Mubinul Haque

Ranked 17th in User experience - How well was the user interaction implemented. with 5 ratings (Score: 2.739)

View submission page

CriteriaRankScore*Raw Score
Haptics - Did the entry make good use of haptics?#72.1912.400
Theme incorporation - How well did the entry fit the theme.#84.1994.600
Audio - Did the entry make good use of audio?#132.9213.200
Overall#132.9213.200
Fun factor - How much fun was the entry to play.#132.9213.200
User experience - How well was the user interaction implemented.#172.7393.000
Originality - How original was the entry.#182.5562.800

Aaaaaahhh! The Game

by bschoun

Ranked 18th in User experience - How well was the user interaction implemented. with 3 ratings (Score: 2.593)

View submission page

CriteriaRankScore*Raw Score
Originality - How original was the entry.#163.3004.667
User experience - How well was the user interaction implemented.#182.5933.667
Theme incorporation - How well did the entry fit the theme.#182.1213.000
Overall#192.2393.167
Fun factor - How much fun was the entry to play.#192.5933.667
Audio - Did the entry make good use of audio?#192.1213.000
Haptics - Did the entry make good use of haptics?#210.7071.000

Space Base

by tastywolf

Ranked 19th in User experience - How well was the user interaction implemented. with 6 ratings (Score: 2.500)

View submission page

CriteriaRankScore*Raw Score
Originality - How original was the entry.#54.0004.000
Theme incorporation - How well did the entry fit the theme.#64.5004.500
Fun factor - How much fun was the entry to play.#73.3333.333
Overall#162.7222.722
Haptics - Did the entry make good use of haptics?#171.0001.000
User experience - How well was the user interaction implemented.#192.5002.500
Audio - Did the entry make good use of audio?#201.0001.000

Wringman

by henkehedstrom

Ranked 20th in User experience - How well was the user interaction implemented. with 5 ratings (Score: 2.373)

View submission page

CriteriaRankScore*Raw Score
Originality - How original was the entry.#83.8344.200
Audio - Did the entry make good use of audio?#142.7393.000
Haptics - Did the entry make good use of haptics?#151.0951.200
Theme incorporation - How well did the entry fit the theme.#163.2863.600
Fun factor - How much fun was the entry to play.#172.7393.000
Overall#172.6782.933
User experience - How well was the user interaction implemented.#202.3732.600