Skip to main content

Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
TagsGame Engines

Does AI Hatred Hurts Artists? My Experience...

A topic by GeppettoNoir created 16 days ago Views: 524 Replies: 20
Viewing posts 1 to 15
(+1)

This is not my main account, so to speak. I use this account for more personal artistic endeavors. So you will not see any goods bought in my "supported" tab here. Like many others, I am quite literally a starving artist. I can't tell you how many times I have had to choose between food and assets to carry on my work. After all this, I went back and looked at how much money I've spent supporting other independents. Just over the past 3 years... It was a 5-digit number.

Part of me felt kind of embarrassed. Especially because I had come to realize that I don't know these people and they, they certainly don't care about me. The amount of backlash I've faced for daring to tinker with AI is so vehemently barbaric, I'm getting pages deleted. Videos taken down... I'm getting my time wasted. The most important, most valuable, most precious resource in the universe. It's being thrown in the trash every time I try to open my mouth--and I'm not even talking to anyone. I'm like a kid on the edge of a pond, just tossing rocks into the water because maybe the ripples will feel like company. Then I get these moderators and anti-AI people walking up to me outta nowhere and kicking my sand castle like, "dude, really?"

I just tried to start a new account on Newgrounds, a place I've been a part of for like 20 years. I just start working on my page, I upload a couple videos. Start working on some thumbnails, trying to arrange everything because my work is kinda out-there and over-the-top. Very scattered, like myself. I burn a few hours and boom, my videos get ripped down. I go to see what the moderator says "AI slop" and refresh the page... My entire profile page is wiped.

So now, I've gotta boot up my second computer and knock the dust off the keyboard. I can't just simply host my own website because corporate greed traded out our public IPs for this CGNAT bull crap so I gotta tunnel through Cloudflare just to feel like I can be allowed to exist. But where am I gonna get the money to cover the increased energy expenses, the domain registration, etc?

Sadly, from Patreon. From Itch. From Unity. From Soundcloud. Supporter subscriptions I've held for years. Subscriptions that won out over months of Hulu or Battle Passes. I cancelled the corporate stuff and just spent more time utilizing the works of the artists I patroned rather than pull myself from what I viewed as a sort of karmic pool. I wanted to be a part of it all, poor as I was. It wasn't even out of hate or anger or spite... I have to express myself. I can't help it. It's like a sickness. Friends go on, people play, I'm in my workshop just tinkering away.

It feels like more than the end of a bunch of subscriptions. It feels like being way back in elementary school again, looking up to the cool kids, and then hearing them talk about you behind your back. Even on itch, I don't just buy assets to be supportive anymore. I always like this concept of "the art community". They never really noticed me, or talked to me, but when they finally did it just felt cold and sharp.

It makes me wonder if there are other people like me out there, just trying to go about their business, getting wrecked by the AI hate lol. And to put things in context, I'm talking like a 5-10 second image2video animation of my own stuff. Boom, it's slop. I'm a terrible person.

Can't do it anymore, man. The magic is just... gone.

(1 edit) (+8)

If you just generate your stuff via AI, you are not an artist. You're an impostor who wants credit and applause for doing the thing, but instead of actually doing the thing, you rent a machine that steals from actual artists.

So maybe the AI hate does harm you, but it certainly does not harm artists.

What does harm artists is AI grifters sucking all the air out of the room and then having the audacity to pretend that they are the victims in all of this.

(+2)

lol damn... well, I think I see what the OP is talking about xD

For what it's worth, just do your thing. The truth is, 99.9999 percent of people have no idea what AI is, how it works, what it does, etc... And, frankly, what kind of person do you think it takes to read what seems like a heartfelt post, then attack a stranger like the guy above me did? Not the kind of people I'd wanna show my stuff to, if it were me. But then again, my mom woulda smacked me in the mouth if he she heard me talk to someone like that unprovoked. Grown man or not, lol. She's brutal like that.

But yeah, the internet ain't what it used to be. That's for sure. Keep going man, do you and express yourself. Good luck with your own individual art process, wherever it leads you. Someone once told me, you don't make art for the consumer. You make it for the universe  o/

(3 edits) (+6)
The truth is, 99.9999 percent of people have no idea what AI is

... yeah. Sure. Because AI is not actively being shoved down the throat of every single person who interacts with computers or phones on a regular basis.

And, frankly, what kind of person do you think it takes to read what seems like a heartfelt post, then attack a stranger like the guy above me did?

OP is whinging because they are doing something shitty (spamming their AI slop in artist spaces where that AI slop is not wanted) and people are getting mad at them because of it. They are asking everybody else to change their behaviour, because they themselves are not willing to reconsider why spamming AI slop in artist spaces would make actual artists mad.

I do not care how "heartfelt" that is. No matter how deeply OP is convinced that this stance is 100% reasonable, it is a shitty expectation to have. OP is the problem. OP has the option to change, to do actual creative work and be respected for it. They choose not to. They choose to demand of everybody else that they stop criticizing them.

OP is not the victim here.

To answer your question, the kind of person it takes to give such an answer is a person with critical reasoning skills.

But yeah, the internet ain't what it used to be.

Yeah. For one thing, there's AI slop everywhere and all the creative spaces are overrun by AI slop spammers expecting to be taken serious.

(+1)

"... yeah. Sure. Because AI is not actively being shoved down the throat of every single person who interacts with computers or phones on a regular basis."

100% agree with you there. They cram it in everything and it's dumb.

"OP is whinging because they are doing something shitty"

We've got no idea what they're working on. Might be slop. Might be the AI mona lisa :P

All I read was someone wants to share something they made with AI and people keep dogging on them. 

"OP is not the victim here."

I dunno man... I read the OP and I read your stuff and I feel like you're doing a pretty good job of proving that might not be true. Just sayin.

> We've got no idea what they're working on. Might be slop. Might be the AI mona lisa :P

It doesn't really matter if you make the worst AI slop, or the best AI slop, because it is AI slop regardless. AI is a) intrinsically uncreative and b) plagiarizes with impunity. If I download the Mona Lisa from Wikipedia, print it on a poster and claim that I painted it, that would not make me a great artist. If you use AI to steal from other artists, the same thing goes: the result is not yours and it does not matter how good it is.

> I dunno man... I read the OP and I read your stuff and I feel like you're doing a pretty good job of proving that might not be true. Just sayin.

Stealing from other artists, spamming your AI slop in communities that categorically do not want to see it, and then whinging about it online are bad things even if you use polite language to talk about them.

Being polite does not make you morally justified, and if you do something shitty and other people get angry about it, that does not suddenly turn you from the perpetrator to the victim.

(+1)

Hatred is not a good thing. It makes people feel justified doing bad things. And it makes discussion impossible.

People can chose and avoid whatever they like. No hate needed for that. We are talking art here. There is many things called art by some, that is not art in the view of others.

If there would be a gallery of oil paintings and someone would submit a photographed print of something that looks like an oil painting, that gallery would very likely reject it. Or if they do allow such things, some fans of oil paintings would probably dislike it for various reasons.

But what is the purpose of the gallery, what do the guests want to see? Do they want to see portraits? Do they want to see oil on canvas? Do they want to see the paintings of a child, that only the parents would praise? Do they want to see painting of that one artist that is famous, but now only paints "abstract"? What about charcoal sketches or wood carvings?

Well, depends on the gallery and the guests.

If you want to exhibit at a place that only allows oil on canvas, you will have a hard time submitting something that does not fit.

But if you visit a place that allows all kinds of works, the guests do have to deal with the fact that there actually are all kinds of works. Sure, they might rumble on about how certain things are actually not works, or how those things are bad and should be forbidden and so on. But curiously enough, those works actually are not forbidden. Not by law and not by the place they visit.

This is still art we are talking about and guests will chose what they want to see or not. No hate needed and no convincing by righteous people.

In my opinion, AI things are tolerated at best. In situations where a thing would not exist at all. Like in a no budget single developer situation. The novelty of AI has worn off. People do not like it in their recreational media as a substitute for the real thing. 

And to put things in context, I'm talking ... of my own stuff

That's what AI haters do not get. Their usual arguments are short sighted. It's just hate. And one can even use an AI system trained with your own things. On your own computer even. The rig one would play a 3D game for hours.

And AI slop is not slop because it is AI, it's slop because it's slop. But because it is very easy to create a lot of slop with AI, you will see a lot more AI slop than regular slop. Appealing AI things are rare though. A professional developer would be wise to classify and treat any AI assets as prototype and switch to commissioned art sooner or later. It's still art we are talking, and people do not like to see or read AI, when they expect craft and art.

@Durance Gaming - I appreciate your benefit of the doubt on my behalf. Thank you. As for the other person, yeah that's pretty much what I'm talking about lol.

@redonihunter - You said something that really stuck with me. "If there would be a gallery of oil paintings and someone would submit a photographed print of something that looks like an oil painting, that gallery would very likely reject it." For some reason that made me feel better overall. I think the biggest problem I'm facing is that I can't find any gallery. It's either total AI slop/AI bros or furious anti-AI hate. There doesn't seem to be an inbetween where you can actually try new things.


To whomever it may concern, the recent videos I was referring to were simply visual examples of something I had been working on for over 6 months. It's just a visual representation of how Poly-Rhythmic Congruence plays out in real time. Two short 2-minute clips to illustrate/sum-up 6 months of amateur research.

A simple explanation for PRC is like how you can take a music video, remove the music, and add in a completely different song but it still looks like they go together because the video was made to similar beat/timing. Except with PRC, it's a phenomena that can happen with completely unrelated things. So I used my own written poetry as prompts, my own illustration for the 1st frame, and used them to create a 2-minute micro story to show how even the AI generator coincidentally follows the same musical timing and patterns. The video was placed at the center of the screen, and then audio-driven patterns were edited in to help viewers pinpoint the appropriate areas of congruence. The second video was the same, except used a different image every 5-10 seconds to see if they would match the audio patterns (which they did). So 3 completely unrelated sources (audio, visual, interpolation) coincidentally coming together as if intentionally timed. It was a demonstration of a phenomena that needed 2 short videos.

It's not supposed to be "hey look at this thing I didn't draw" it's supposed to be "I have used AI to demonstrate this principle" but no one ever bothers to read the "about" section of the video. They just see obvious AI (which I don't hide) and scream "SLOP!!!" then ban me or wipe my stuff immediately, which is incredibly aggravating. 

(+1)
They just see obvious AI (which I don't hide) and scream "SLOP!

If the platform bans AI, it would be normal for them to ban it. But calling it slop is unnecessary. If the platform allows AI, complain to the platform about the moderators.

For newgrounds, they do ban prompt generated movies.

AI Animation

Any work that appears to be largely generated by a prompt will be removed

our goal is that the majority of the work is human-made and not AI-made

Apparantly no one told them, that digital movies are almost never human made. Giving instructions to a rendering software is not technically human made, but human instructed. Which would be literally what a prompt does with more luxury. The time when something like 2d cartoons were human drawn and then just photographed to make a movie are gone. I know what they mean, but it is poorly worded.

Speaking of photography, does a photographer create an image? How does that compare to a painter that does create a painting by hand? In the olden days, painters even mixed the paint themselves. How about the artistic value of a photo image? There can be no doubt that it is now considered as art, but how do images taken with a phone fit in the story? Every person now has the ability to just press a button on their always accessible pocket device and create an image in a second that has better accuracy than a traditional oil on canvas painter might create in a week. And with no skill in painting whatsoever.

Yes, even a child can operate an ai prompt. And we cannot call any output of such an activity art, just as we cannot call every selfie a piece of art. But still, there is skill than can be applied in operating the ai. It is different skills than painting with oil on canvas or than holding a stylus on a tablet or than composing textures in a rendering software. But skill nontheless. And with skill comes the possibilty to apply that skill masterfully, which is the root of art.

What you did or try to do is exploring that application of ai. You did not just try to recreate a thing a traditional artist could have done.

Itch is centered about games and not art. The closest thing that might apply are jams that are about games with ai. Like this one https://itch.io/jam/ai-game-jam-2 . And of course those experimental games that use ai for other things than assets.

(+2)

You're getting your time wasted?  No, you're the one wasting the time of the moderators who have to delete the feces you're smearing all over their communities.

(1 edit) (+10)

To you it might seem trivial to use AI to make your picture into a video, but that video is literally a slap in the face to everyone who has worked to be able to animate, film, and edit videos themselves. The AI can only do it by consuming vast amounts of similar content, all of which was made with human work-hours, and wasn't published with the intention of being put through a pattern recognition meatgrinder just for your convenience.

It isn't illegal for you to use generative AI, you're welcome to post it on your own website or on platforms that allow it. But I think it is deeply ironic that you would complain about the places that do allow AI turning into slop-fests. What did you expect to happen? How would you create an "in between"? Tell people that they can just use it a little bit? That is unrealistic, there's just no practical way to enforce it. If AI is allowed, it is likely to be fully allowed, and then you will experience the race-to-the-bottom economy it creates. In that world, there is a direct incentive to let the AI produce as much as possible, because that makes it fast fast fast, and volume is what matters most. Choosing to generate only 50% of your work just means you are 50% behind. 

Here, AI content is allowed but is supposed to be flagged, and the majority of people who come here are serious about supporting humans, not machines, and thus are going to be very cautious and discerning on the whole. So, from my perspective, AI hate is the only thing keeping this space sane.

i completely agree

The irony in the original poster’s situation is that Newgrounds, like Itch.io, is a site that does compromise on AI use in projects. At least one of the most recognizable moderators there is a big defender of AI in art spaces (as irritating as that is to many members).

Newgrounds also a platform with decades-old arguments about what should be allowed. Tweening, for example, is as old as Disney animation, but it gets downvotes and loud complaints when it shows up in the top of the Movie portals. Tweening isn’t hurting people like the AI industry is; there are simply strong opinions there.

It was obviously the way the AI-generated content was presented that made the moderator angry.

(+1)

A lot of people are weirdly aggressive about AI right now, even when it’s being used as just another creative tool. Honestly, most artists are just trying to make stuff and survive, and getting instantly labeled “AI slop” without context can kill motivation fast.

(1 edit) (+1)

AI is not "just another creative tool", it is a "tool" that can only exist by stealing from every artist in the world and that can only create soulless, worthless slop. It is a tool for art in the same way that a crowbar is a tool for managing your finances.

You're right, most artists ARE just trying to make stuff and survive. Meanwhile, AI slop spammers are slapping dozens of games onto storefronts, often actively lying about the involvement of AI (that includes you, Mr. Gamecraftor, and I am still waiting for you to get permabanned from this website for that), destroying consumer trust in platforms like itch.io and making it so much harder to get any attention as an actual creative actually making actual art. It hurts even worse because I work in a niche where monetization means complete removal of any itch.io visibility so I cannot even set up a tip jar, and meanwhile the AI sloppers who do not give a single damn about their product whine just because some people do not give them their unconditional admiration.

That's why I am "aggressive" about AI: it is slowly ruining everything I care about. Literature, visual art, movies, anime, programming and game development, all of these spaces are aggressively being invaded by AI spammers who insist they are artists in spite of their products being obvious garbage to everybody who is not an AI cultist. I will not accept that quietly and I will not be polite to the people who are doing it, especially when these people are lying about what they are doing (again, that means you), obfuscating what they are actually doing with cheap rhetoric tricks (like the "just a tool" nonsense line) and sucking all of the air out of art spaces.

I sincerely hope that this post kills your motivation, because your slop game that you are actively lying about (which, again, violates the site's ToU, not that anybody cares) is flat-out a detriment to this platform.

Deleted 7 days ago
Moderator

Hey, man. Please don’t spam the forum with long posts in duplicate. Especially when it’s a rant full of bad language. Keep it constructive, okay? You’re not going to convince anyone like that.

Deleted 7 days ago
(2 edits)

As an illustrator, I understand that AI is a massive infringement of rights.
but not because of AI itself... rather, because of the way it’s being used.
I don’t think the right restrictions have been put in place, which is why I’ve only used AI for simple tasks that don’t infringe on anyone’s rights: animating my own illustrations without changing anything about them, and a handful of pixel art pieces (I still do the bulk of the pixel art myself).

I think using it this way isn’t wrong; what’s wrong is stealing styles.

For those of you who are deciding whether or not to include AI in your games, I’ll tell you that my first game has a version without AI and another version with AI...

Both have been downloaded in almost equal numbers...

so I see two opposing camps of roughly equal size.

Where did the pixel art in the generator’s dataset come from?

I’ve seen AI images here on Itch.io that appear to have been based on the actual art made by people I know from other sites. I’ve been wondering if that’s somehow a coincidence.

I’ve also seen pixel artists give up on sharing any art online because the constant scraping of all our work wore them out. Other pixel artists who used to lead drawing events pulled back behind paywalls to reduce abuse. With what I’ve witnessed in other art forms, it’s hard to believe the pixel “art” programs were built on as much stolen art as the other types were.

But it would be a tiny amount or comfort (with how the AI industry is burning up our planet, polluting essential resources for quick text-to-image-to-text and chatbot production, and spreading harmful propaganda developed by artist-hating fascists) if these responses from other pixel artists were from paranoia, not actual abuse.

(I know my writing, photos, and graphic designs were scraped without my consent. I’m not sure my pixel art has.)

"I’ve been wondering if that’s somehow a coincidence."

See, the fun thing about AI is that nobody can ever say for sure if it is a coincidence or not. Therefor, it is completely morally acceptable!!1! 

(2 edits)

Abandon all your hopes and dreams and make fruit island slop now on Tiktok if you want an AI following. 

You made this bed now lay in it. I don't know why you thought indie sites support AI?

I don't know, mate. I don't want anyone hurt. I am not a fan of commercial AI art, I don't support it. I don't like using hateful language either. I'm sorry you're feeling hurt, but, I just don't see indie sites supporting AI anytime. It does hurt non-AI artists, so, I don't know.