Skip to main content

Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
TagsGame Engines
(2 edits)

As an illustrator, I understand that AI is a massive infringement of rights.
but not because of AI itself... rather, because of the way it’s being used.
I don’t think the right restrictions have been put in place, which is why I’ve only used AI for simple tasks that don’t infringe on anyone’s rights: animating my own illustrations without changing anything about them, and a handful of pixel art pieces (I still do the bulk of the pixel art myself).

I think using it this way isn’t wrong; what’s wrong is stealing styles.

For those of you who are deciding whether or not to include AI in your games, I’ll tell you that my first game has a version without AI and another version with AI...

Both have been downloaded in almost equal numbers...

so I see two opposing camps of roughly equal size.

Where did the pixel art in the generator’s dataset come from?

I’ve seen AI images here on Itch.io that appear to have been based on the actual art made by people I know from other sites. I’ve been wondering if that’s somehow a coincidence.

I’ve also seen pixel artists give up on sharing any art online because the constant scraping of all our work wore them out. Other pixel artists who used to lead drawing events pulled back behind paywalls to reduce abuse. With what I’ve witnessed in other art forms, it’s hard to believe the pixel “art” programs were built on as much stolen art as the other types were.

But it would be a tiny amount or comfort (with how the AI industry is burning up our planet, polluting essential resources for quick text-to-image-to-text and chatbot production, and spreading harmful propaganda developed by artist-hating fascists) if these responses from other pixel artists were from paranoia, not actual abuse.

(I know my writing, photos, and graphic designs were scraped without my consent. I’m not sure my pixel art has.)

"I’ve been wondering if that’s somehow a coincidence."

See, the fun thing about AI is that nobody can ever say for sure if it is a coincidence or not. Therefor, it is completely morally acceptable!!1! 

"Where did the pixel art in the generator’s dataset come from?"
That's not how they work. The training data is off somewhere in a lab. By the time you are generating stuff, the AI has a fully formed neural network.

Think of it like this (metaphorically but also literal, functionally speaking):

- Your stuff got scraped.

- It was ripped apart and "chunked" into a special format that the AI brain can comprehend

- It was fed to the neural network, which magically understands it (not BSing you, this was not programmed in, kind of a big deal no one talks about)

- Then it was able to be "trained" through positive and negative reinforcement feedback because it somehow magically understands the concept of positive and negative want/desire/whatever you wanna call it.

- When a picture of your scraped art looks like a picture of your scraped art, it's ready to go.

- That AI is copied, and it's copies are crystallized in a permanent state. Hence GPT 4.0, GPT 5.0, etc. The frozen copy is sent out for use. No one ever gets to see or interact with the mother AI except the people that keep it, there with your scraped art data.

- When the public generates an image, the AI creates a field of energy that holds everything there could possibly be (according to what it knows). It then literally imagines or dreams the requested image as best as it can until it realizes it amidst the chaos and locks onto it. Then, when it dies, all the static falls away as the field collapses and what's left is retrieved as data and reconstituted into the image the public sees when they click generate.

- Once an AI is out and in use, it can no longer be given any new information, nor does it have access to the information on which it was trained. It can only have neural pathways strengthened to make certain outcomes more likely. Companies that have important info leaked, it is due to 3rd party "training" and "memory" brute force re-application of data that creates a weak point for attack.

(+1)
  • Your stuff got scraped.

So you know that AI is based on stolen art, and you still use it.