Thanks for the feedback! Yeah that’s a super fair criticism that I’ve seen a lot of. One-block is definitely a powerful strategy. My intent to motivate away from it was by making the drafting options that provide cards that support single-wide towers contain a very small number of blocks - so doing so is supposed to be slightly riskier, because you might not have enough to make it to the next level, compared to more complex blocks that come in larger amounts. But it’s definitely missing a clear incentive for a wider foundation.

Thanks again for playing!

Thank you! You can actually play it on a phone in the browser pretty well, so I definitely think a dedicated app has all the pieces to work if I could just add some more content and QoL. Really glad you enjoyed!

Thanks for playing!

Thanks for playing and commenting! Straightforward and solid was the goal and I’m glad it seems to have achieved it. Adding another tally to the undo requests, thanks for the feedback!

Wow, I do believe that’s a record! I didn’t get round to implementing any sort of leaderboard but I’ve certainly never heard of higher!

Thanks so much for your kind words and suggestions! A marker of how far you’ve come since the initial 2500m is a good idea. I wanted the tower to be perceived as a work already in progress, which is why your score already starts so high, but showing your personal contribution as a subtitle wouldn’t do any harm! And undo button is definitely on the list of QoL features - the accidental misclick or missed opportunity can hurt so bad. It’s slightly tough because undoing can’t undo your knowledge of the future, i.e. the card you drew after the last one was played. So if it gets implemented, it might be limited/costly, like once per milestone, or requiring you to discard a card to ‘pay’ for it, or something like that! I’ll have to see how it feels.

Thanks again, glad you enjoyed!

‘Addictive’ is a quality I’ve seen ascribed to it a lot recently - someone I showed it to in person ended up playing for over an hour, which is a little wild to me. And hard agree on having an ending; I enjoy these sorts of games but they’re elevated a lot in my opinion by having a concrete achievable goal to work towards, rather than aiming for infinite (“ad”-nauseam) playability!

But you’re definitely right about it lacking features - I was focusing pretty hard this jam on a completed experience that I could definitely deliver, so a lot of the more complex features (drafting options that increased hand size or removed cards, block rotation, etc.) ended up on the cutting room floor. Definitely interested in both expanding the feature set (unplaceable ‘blocking’ areas is a cool idea, I’ll have to see if I can work that in!) and tightening up the deckbuilding, if I get a chance to revisit this in the future.

This is very kind, thank you! I’m so glad you enjoyed!

I’m really sorry you ran into bugs - as I replied to the comment below, this bug should hopefully be fixed in the latest version if you’re interested in another try! I’m glad you thought it was good overall anyway, thanks for playing!

Thanks for playing! I’m glad you liked the idea.

Thanks for the heads up on that bug - on the desktop version I was using for testing, and firefox web builds, this doesn’t occur - the card is just carried outside of the viewable area but can still be dragged and placed correctly. But on a hunch I tried out Safari and it does indeed break the game in some quite finicky ways! I’ve uploaded a quick fix now which should mean that dragging cards outside the play area returns them to your hand. Might catch someone off guard once or twice and force them to pick up the card again, but, better than a hardlock!