itch.io

I needed more than few minutes to try it out... it got boring with more of the same after half an hour, but the first half hour was fun. To your questions:

• early game pacing felt OK albeit all those help messages were bit much. Anyways I figured out what I need to do and the help messages stopped soon.
• The pricing decision had effect, which was nice. Unfortunately I started my pricing higher than necessary since I first thought the recommended sales price was my cost for the goods.  I assumed the price displayed in the wholesale screen was what I have to pay at first.
• I played on PC, the third vending machine had an issue with the size of the items inside the machine
• I also find the items weird. The vague association of sex toys in their naming makes no sense to me.

The organizers of game jams are looking for genuinely creative games. AI can't make those, since it can't make anything which isn't some kind of blend of the stuff it was trained with. So the game jam organizers might as well want to save themselves the time to review games that are just another version of regurgitated content.

Since I made game about running a café (https://smurjo.itch.io/s-caf-am-markt), I might be able to help with various cakes, plates, cups and fork. I don't have a coffee machine. Have a look here

 and tell me whether it's the style you are looking for. I would make a downloadable asset-pack for you if you kindly mention me in the credits. 

I guess it is understood that you can't sell my assets which I would give you for free. Nor do I approve their use for training AI.

I have the same fear. Of course I have anti-virus-software on my own PC but two chances of catching a virus would be better than one. 

Are you looking for 2D or 3D? How old is very old? Medieval? Roman? Egyptian? Wiking? I might have a 1900 shipyard 3D (if that's old enough):

The other thing is that tastes differ. Let's think some cozy farming sim compared to a zombie ego-shooter. To market your cozy farming sim you'd have go to a place where people expect to find cozy farming sims. I think itch.io is doing a good job allowing to search for one kind or the other. And there are enough games to choose from in the search result.

Since I've made game development my "full time hobby" (beside my full time job), I don't really have time for reading. Which includes visual novels, so my opinion might be a bit off from the typical visual novel audience. I have however implemented a run-into-story-sections-mechanics in a 3D world in my detective game. This way, IMHO you have to do less descriptions since the world is right there for the player to experience. You don't need to write stuff like "Looking onto main street there was charming little café." Your player can see that far better than in 2D. Besides lighting goes a long way to create the atmosphere you intend.

Of course it's matter of personal preference if you rather create a 3D world or 2D images. I don't think 3D is necessarily more work. I personally need 3D models to get light and perspective right when making more complex 2D images and there are lots of free 3D assets out there (albeit I pride myself to make my own) . 

Here is the link to my detective game  https://smurjo.itch.io/detective-martin-gunnarson.  ASWhalerGamer kindly streamed it on YouTube (link in the comments), so you don't necessarily need to download the game to get a first impression. I'd also offer you to suggest your own murder/accident/suicide case for the detective game which I'd implement and mention you in the credits.

Hi DevInTraining,

I attempted the same thing  a few years back. And it kind of worked, even without AI. I don't know whether you researched story structure.  Following the rules will get you a mediocre story anytime.  But for a great story genuine creativity is needed. Something unique, that the reader finds worth remembering. Which isn't stuff already known just presented in a different mixture. Of course AI, pulling from a huge database, might find known plots that are just new to you. So it might be a great thing for expanding your own knowledge. But the more you know, the less impressed you are.

Concerning Blueprints: I tried on several occasions and came back scripting. Here is why:

• It's slower. Picking the boxes and  connecting them takes more time than just writing down a line of code. This is especially true with the automatic code completion and code snippets that modern editors offer.
• Anytime you want to insert something in-between you find yourself rearranging the other stuff to make room.
• It doesn't scale well. In my current project, which is far from finished, I already have 140 classes with a little less than 500 000 characters in total (the functionality ranging from playing music, displaying UI Screens, inventory management, simulation and player movement  to the procedural generation of an environment). If you estimate you'd need a box for each 50 characters in average (which seems a very generous estimate to me) , you'd need to arrange 10 000 boxes
• I tried Unreal but don't use it right now with Blueprints being part of the reason

Hi together, I wouldn't call myself very religious but I'm definitely against violence. So I wonder how you Christian developers think about violence in games?

Hi Imagination,

• In general I like to try out fellow indie developers games. Given the huge choice, I select the games I give a try. I didn't try your game because I don't like games with violence. The title and the words 'high stakes' and 'creatures' make me think there is violence involved.
• A screenshot plus a short summary (scenario, goal and main rules) would work best for me.  I don't think it's a good idea to reference other games much, as the games your audience might have played may vary a lot.
• I don't know where to post to actually get players. I send e-mails to people I know in person. Even then my games are not everybody. That's OK for me.
• If you like to play my nonviolent project (I guess the compass mechanics could be useful for other games too, violent or not):

https://smurjo.itch.io/building-bill-burton-road

Hi XVerse, 

 I'd like you to play my game https://smurjo.itch.io/building-bill-burton-road . 

Since I will be using the procedural map generation in my next game as well, I'm especially interested in

• how you like the environment and what could be tweaked
• the frame rate on your computer and - if you experience them - occasions of frame rate drops 

Of course I'm generally interested in any observations to improve this game. Since all my games are for free and I don't even accept donations, I'd ask you to play it for free.  

Many thanks.

"Quicksilver" might be a blob of silver liquid floating on the ground. You can't move from the moment it touches your feet until it has floated on. It might float downhill (if there is such a thing as downhill in your environment) which gives the player some way to predict its path and avoid it.

BTW I didn't check it out, because I don't do this kind of violence, not even to zombies. 

AI image? We wouldn't have suspected it 4 years ago, but in fact the research on AI is decades old. 

Nice game and quite addictive. I was a bit disappointed because after I'd managed one strike for bloom the greenhouse wouldn't open anymore after the next scoring  and my cursor was gone. So I guess I'll never get to the other levels.

All for games in historical setting. I think history has valuable lessons to teach. One of them being war is generally a bad idea...

In my opinion you shouldn't publish every game you ever made but the ones you think are worthwhile playing. If you publish a game you need to go the extra mile with a help function and a credits page, maybe even localization (which in my opinion has the extra benefit all your texts are in one place and easy to find should you - and it is going to happen - discover a typo during game play). I myself have started about 30 games over the years, most of them playable, but I published only 6. The last game I didn't publish felt more like work than like fun and I had to admit to myself the idea wasn't as brilliant as I thought.

Hi simenhs, 

I played your game and I like it.  Nice concept and nice graphics. I feel the roads are getting comparably expensive very fast.  I also didn't like that I couldn't remove forest to build something else (I can understand I can't remove mountains). I guess it is also a question of experience playing this game to make the most money.

Since I place buildings by drag&drop in my newer games it felt a bit complicated to me to first click and then click again to place the building. You can still show what the building wants with drag and drop when it isn't dropped in a valid location yet.

I wonder if the player actually needs to click the NPC if this is the only option he has anyway in the store. You might play a video as soon as the player enters the store (or display a text, if the video is too much effort. In my estimate 1 min video = 1 day of work, of course depending on the amount of new assets and animations you need). You can make videos as well as play them with the Unity engine. 

After video is over the player stand inside the 3D store and needs decide where to go next. You might want to provide the player with some guidance where to go next. I have done this in my detective game by footsteps on the ground using decals in Unity.  

BTW if you'd like to provide a murder case as a story I'd offer to build it into my detective game. After the first section, which presents the intro for the investigation, the other sections appear in random order.  Mixed in are sections to confuse the player. This might be irrelevant facts or a person lying. Finally, after the player has filed his investigation report, a summary of the murder case is presented, so that the player can see how right or wrong his investigation was.

Hi, I tried it and found it simple to understand and funny even though it isn't the kind of game I'd usually play. I felt the reaction time from pressing the button to the chicken moving somewhat long. This did cause the chicken to move further than I intended (and got it killed).

I could pick up the card but I couldn't insert it. I could only drop or throw it.

Unfortunately I got stuck in the elevator and never made it to the upper floors... I had the impression I should press L but nothing happened. 

For my taste the colors are quite dull - I don't understand whether that's intentional. The elevator doors material might benefit from a normal map. 

It would be a compass:

That compensate for the problem that the compass in the game - to make it easier - doesn't actually work like a real compass works. It points in which direction you are going whereas a real compass always points  north.

It looks more like the steering wheel of a ship than a handle of a valve on a pipe. I've looked up how handles on valves look on some random internet page (https://boilersinfo.com/types-of-valves-with-images/) for you;

The red color for handle I feel is a good choice (assuming it is somewhat consistent with other interact-able parts in your game). Additional it would help if there was some light hinting at the valve. Currently your eye is immediately drawn to the light on the left. 

The sound effect is nice, albeit not very realistic (I have worked in a lab testing valves in the past). Mostly valves operate noiselessly. There might be an occasional squeaking. And there might be the noise of cavitation, which can occur when the valve is almost closed. Cavitation is vapor bubbles imploding (you might want to look up cavitation) and damages valves over time.  You might be able to hear it if you open a faucet just a tiny bit (so that the water runs into the sink mostly without noise just a little above dripping) and put your ear close to the handle. You listen for short, sharp sounds like "pop" not unlike firecrackers.

You set out to develop game of low quality? Like sloppy and buggy? Really?

Wow, that's impressive number of possibilities. So I'd like to share another link I use since I am doing games in historical setting.  These are public domain recordings of classical music from https://musopen.org/.  Among other criteria you can search music by instrument and time period there.

I absolutely agree with you hechelion. I am making - imo nicer looking - games for years beside my full time job in the field of engineering. Without having marketing - except e-mails to friends and family - I built a very modest following and I don't know how many would actually spend money to play my games. I personally don't want payments because among other things it would complicate my taxes more than it is worth.

And there is another aspect. I'd call it  "the grass is always greener on the other side". There must be something that made DNA games become an engineer. But once he was an engineer he though game development would be nicer. Now that he is a game developer is guess he is already thinking of something that would be nicer... No job is 100% fun. Not even game development. I can still love my job  even if I have to go through parts that aren't fun. I think it's quite satisfying to work with actual physical products.

What you describe is  what happens in real life. It's called inflation. Maybe you want to be careful raising taxes in the first place. Not more than your citizen can afford. But I see your point, one must be able to pause the game to process the ripples some actions might cause.

So far I didn't plan interactions. Every citizen decides on his screen. If the baker raises the price of bread the other citizen have to pay. Obviously playing an excessively greedy baker will not make your settlement thrive as a whole.

Naturally I will limit the number of jobs to the essential at first because of cause it's a lot of work. I was thinking more of abstraction than of shallow.  Baker, tailor and alchemist all buy materials, have production chains and skill trees. 

Of course there are a few special cases, like the mayor. What the major does - acquiring people, designating areas for logging, mining or building - would be a screen in a city builder anyway.  Employees of the city, like the teacher or the priest won't have much to do. They just can look at their finances. And if the cost of living will make the teacher likely to leave the major will better give them a pay rise.

Hi gamers and fellow game developers,

I would like to get your feedback the following city builder concept:

Think of a typical city builder like e.g. Anno or Banished. You need resources for building, the population needs housing, food, drink and firewood etc. . As usual you build roads and houses and specific buildings that fulfill the resource needs like e.g. a bakery. The city founder also has to win qualified people for his project e.g. a baker to operate the bakery.

Additionally - and this is the new part I am thinking about - the player switches into the role of those leading citizen and organizes their business, e.g. orders raw materials and sets production rates. If the player fails to keep a business profitable the citizen will leave the island and e.g. the bakery will not operate until a new baker is found.

I am thinking of this icon to represent citizens: Would you unterstand it?

When clicking on the icon you get a list of citizen on your island with some overview data:

Your citizens have a "play" button which allows you to play as them. You get to see their inventory, you get their skill tree in school, can take a loan at the bank for them and you can set their monthly purchases and production. There will also be a separate help screens per character. Do you know any games where you switch from playing one person to playing anther like that? What do you think of the idea?

As you can imagine the well-being of your citizens requires multiple characters to do their job successfully. What do you think? Nice idea or way to complex for the player?

So far I didn't feel the need to put anything on my itch.io page - but I do have nice thumbnails for my games. In my opinion that's a better investment of my time.

Maybe the many dots triggered it... Knowing that artists usually earn less than programmers I wonder whether that is true though. Maybe artist just don't flock around where programmers do but e.g. around art exhibitions, art schools and the like.

Hi Iam, 

It's not exactly what I expected looking for a city builder. Nevertheless it's nice looking and indeed fun. Thanks for making this!

Hi Gaziduc, my bad. I didn't understand I can only place program steps on the plus tiles. Instead I try to click the + sign with no effect and dragged the cards anywhere else but the plus sign. This isn't necessary in my opinion. Just let the player drop a card anywhere and position it by rounding its position to the next square. 

 I did 3 levels. I actually liked programming by drag and drop. Far less cumbersome than having code snippets inserted by Visual Studio (typing is often faster). And why not - beside code snippets - have a card for each variable already declared?

Since I know how to program that should be easy - but it wasn't. I wanted some if - else thing - jumping if there is there is a hole and walking if not.  I think the end of the if block with a stop sign isn't optimal. It would be better if you could stretch the if block itself and place the other commands inside the block. When I "officially" learned programming I had already learned programing the auto didactic way. Nonetheless I benefited from those lessons because I learned to think in blocks. When I type code I'd usually type the closing bracket of a block at the same time as the opening bracket and fill in the content later. 

I also didn't like I couldn't see the level in advance. In my opinion its a good habit to plan ahead before you code and have some general structure/philosophy where your classes and methods fit in. 

I'm using Firefox on Windows11

Hi Gaziduc, the drag and drop didn't work. So my test ended very fast. 

It's not logical to me why move would create Mr. Mustache. I might declare a variable. Like Character MrMustache=new Character().

I made a game online together with someone. Or rather started it with someone and mostly finished it alone, since the other couldn't put in so much time anymore because of his job . Working together online with screen sharing is fine, especially when the content you are sharing is digital anyway. You sure learn different ways of seeing things. You'll also have to accept things aren't always done your way.

With painter and sculptors co-living is commonplace. It's called artist residency. You'd have to apply with your work and it's not easy to get in. I think it's a matter of research to find an artist residency for digital artists or an artists residency that is willing to take in a digital artist (maybe hoping he'll fix all their computer issues).

I'm haven't looked for a  HTTP server recently, the only one I know is Apache Tomcat which is free.  There are however also multiplayer functionalities in game engines as well. I know the Unity engine has it (and I bet the Unreal engine has to have it too). The Unity engine and the Unreal engine aren't free in case you make substantial money with your games. But they are free for hobbyists. You'll want to check out your different options of game engines considering you want to do multiplayer.

The IP4 address is only valid in your local segment and not unique beyond that. Plus you'd usually be using dhcp. Which means your computer gets a new IP4-address every time your computer reconnects to the network. You'd have to find out your current IP4-address again every time. 

There are definitely better alternatives which work between players world wide without bothering them to type in long number sequences. For example a public domain client-server solution. The server is just a piece of software that can run on one of the computer you are playing at. 

Hi Dickmilch, I just published my fifth small game for friends and family for Christmas. Which means right now I am planning the 2026 Christmas game. 

Game development is time consuming, no doubt. I will work on my game all year beside my full time job. This means I possibly have on average 10h per week. I'd typically do very little animation since animation is very time consuming. I estimate I could do 1 minute of animation in the 10 h of one week. But there is all the rest to do, most of it in my case 3D models. I'd estimate I spend half of the time 3D modelling, 20% programming, 20% testing and 10% on miscellaneous other tasks (research, planning, itch.io page etc.) 

In case you aren't into 3D modelling. there are places where you can get free 3D models online. And of course there is AI (But since using AI is basically stealing from the artists whose work was used to train the AI, I don't do it). There is one disadvantage with the free stuff and the AI stuff you need to consider: It is never exactly what you had in mind. When you put together a little bit from here and a little bit from there you inevitably get  a some mismatch in style and quality between the different items. With the time you spend searching for just the right thing you might possibly manage to model it yourself.

I am older myself. That wouldn't bother me. You don't necessarily have to code, there are visual scripting tools too and many people also use AI to help them code. I can't comment on those things from my own experience . I did do a lot of online learning though. There are so many great tutorials on YouTube and the good game engines come with free online tutorials as well.

BTW: I worked on my very first game for several years, with different engines and never finished it. I am fine with that. There is no doubt a lot to learn before you have a game you can be proud to publish. Even now I abandon a half finished game sometimes. The last one I abandoned turned out not to be as much fun as I had hoped.

https://smurjo.itch.io/building-bill-burton-road