Patiently waiting for more if this ♥♥♥
Patty.Coax
Recent community posts
Hey,
thanks for answering, I kinda' agree! These moments would fit Stage 2 better
Why I "kinda" agree:
maaan, I've seen weirder XD I always have to remind myself of my real life experiences with people, which were literally stranger than fiction. I often thought to myself, if I read what just happened or what someone said in a book, I'd go "My god, that's so unrealistic, who would do that?". Yet there it was... Most adults are pretty immature as well, but in select aspects of their life, so ¯\_ (ツ)_/¯
I felt the same about the side characters! I never managed to get to like any of them, apart from Miranda and Terri maybe. I didn't even care enough to play the other romance routes through, I think because they're much more shallow than Cove's and not even near as fun. It's sort of like, just being around somebody a lot doesn't make you friends, if that makes sense?
Flower field: oh, no no, I didn't mean Poppy Hill behind our house; it's the big-ass flower field out of town where we can take Cove as a surprise in Stage 3, as a "surprise back" after the aquarium, play or ice-skating outings.
Oooh, I love slow burns too, the more tension, the better ♥ Cove's route is quite replayable imo, there's so many choices and I had fun with the dynamics :v
Yeah, it's not so much a story, more of a simulator? It worked out very well in the end, but it's hard to find a balance like this. Love this game btw, an all time favourite for sure ♥
Edit: " The way the characters act from step 3 onwards feels a bit off for their age..." Can you elaborate on this? I'm genuinely interested!
//The only 2 things I can think of to improve it would be:
1. Changing the lower quality illustrations, they kinda threw me while playing and
2. When you take Cove to the flower field, there's a line in the end that suggests you're together now; it felt like it was originally another option to become a couple and was forgotten there or something. I remember it gave me a loose end feeling//
I thank you for the level-headed answer; but that's not what I was saying. I'm aware of how awful the AI industry is, who isn't? (Side note: hate to say this, but I can't really think of any industry that's not harmful and/or unethical in some way, if you can, let me know)
I wrote this: "Using AI for programming is very different from using AI in creative works, I think you might want to look into that." I meant you should know the role of AI in programming today to be able to comment on it. No, you don't even need that, you just have to understand what programming is
"Not everyone can do that, and even I cannot completely rid it of my own life. When every website on earth uses AI, that's not feasible and I don't really expect people to. And like I said in the base post, I don't expect people to magically switch from Ren'Py, that's crazy, but I personally am able to do so, and so I will. "
Look, I'm going to be a bit of a d-ck here, but reading this paragraph...like, what is your point then? Why post this at all? (This is rhetorical question, I don't actually want typed out answers. I want you, and the downvoters to think about it)
(Edits) PS.: For anyone, who is concerned about AI in software:
I thought about this a bit, and there's no way of proving there was no AI assistance used in a contribution to Open Source Software, for example on GitHub. How would anyone prove if a certain person's code submitted was the result of a prompt or not? You literally can't tell! So following your logic, you'd have to boycott/not use all open source software, since there is legit no way of knowing if somebody's contribution to the source code is AI made or not...this category (OSS) includes Linux, Firefox, Discord and even Git and Python...so yeah
(Which makes me wonder: how are y'all so sure that Ren'Py is using AI? ((Which it most certainly does btw! :P)) But what's your source? I presume somebody must have said they did openly?)
Plus as we all know, AI use is absolutely wild in proprietary software development, so sadly, you'll just have to deal with the fact that anything that has to do with programming is done, cooked, thoroughly AI-d. Well, at least you don't have to worry about it anymore I suppose?
In general, I don't think it's wise to think in such black and white terms :I
Using AI for programming is very different from using AI in creative works, I think you might want to look into that. I fully agree that AI shouldn't be used for nearly anything art related, there are def. exceptions though, like animation or video editing. Scripts and programs are rarely original anyway, and some stuff is basically impossible to build for yourself without serious help, even if you have experience. Another example: are my 3D models worthless or unethical, if I asked Claude to write me a short script to replace an hour of effing around in Blender each time I need to do the same thing?
Hello, I enjoyed the game, esp the ambiguity was exciting <3 Not to mention it is actually finished! :v
Some random stuff that caught my attention while reading:
- "a BURST of pent up passion BURSTs within"
- "silence descends IN the room" (Should be ON or upon)
-"his slow violence is learning to be reigned in with great effort" (This sentence sounds like all its words were put in a bag and shook very hard)
- (Describing Chao's demeanour) "he brings himself" (instead of carries himself)
I'm sure there's more, so the text could use some fixing up!
I'm not saying this to nitpick, but because I know how hard it is to see one's own mistakes and I'd rather take a little time to point them out to you instead of shrugging and moving on...
So yeah, thanks for the cool game! :v
If you want me to pimp your English, my email is on my profile
The story is good but the writing, um...I have a list of things if you're interested in improving it.
I understand that people want to be encouraging, but I found a LOT of stuff that needs fixing and I'm not talking about typos, I mean the writing itself. If you want the 'red pill' my email can be found on my profile, otherwise top of the day to ya :*
I answered to you a bit too pissed off honestly, because you're expecting the utmost care from people - so it seems - without thinking of your due diligence first
And I feel if one has high demands then they should do their part too
In general: CWs are totally out of control already and people still demand more from creators. I personally think all this pandering needs to stop. We should be all responsible, self-aware adults here, who don't need everything, and I mean absolutely everything spelled out for us. I also find it a bit BS honestly, that all these very sensitive and/or traumatized folks are so eager to consume all the clearly-more-on-the-unhinged-side content...I mean, for example I don't like blood and gore, and after watching a slasher movie anyway, I'm not gonna complain about how I wasn't told specifics about the violence, you see what I mean?
I think because it is VERY obvious what this game is babe :x
There's a complete CW list here, statements before the game starts, and SFW options in-game
Dou you want the creators to hug you personally, and whisper the warnings directly into your ears in a calming manner or what?
Peeps downvote your comment because it's whiny spamming, honestly
Of course, I can only react to what I read. If it doesn't make sense without parts that are not present or without parts which don't exist yet, then...I don't feel like that's my responsibility? :v *pointing finger slowly at ya'*
Being hired! into a position like that through a "job application process" is, omg, how to put this nicely... - I'm sorry, I'm known to be blunt. - Uh, nonsense? Unrealistic and opposing everything one may or may not know about the dynamics of power, control and frankly just humans in general. I'm rather surprised you're trying to defend it at all - it wouldn't happen in the most meritocratic of made up societies. Because people are still people and politics is still politics.
ROYAL. ADVISOR. Consider these words for a minute. You think sb. is being "hired" to be an advisor/whatever of Charles III?
Yea, exactly. And he's not even from a medieval/-ish society.
You'd need to be chosen. Hand picked. And you'd have many competent competitors for such a coveted position. (Once upon a time, the Conservative Party opened their arms wide for candidates who never participated in politics before. They got 4000 applicants. And in the end, 4 were chosen. Who were, ultimately, very much like the career politicians they already had...)
You would need real, not made up connections in high-society, years of advisory experience, immense trust from at least part of the court and at least one of the royals already. You'd need to be present for a substantial amount of time before all this. You'd never get in as an outsider, never! It's like trying for the top of academia without any formal education. Come on, man.
Look, at the end of the day, this is not my circus, not my monkeys. But I do recognize a hot mess when I see one and I'd rather not waste my time on messy drafts :v
Edit: Remembered the wrong party and higher numbers, but still
One last thing: write what you know
Uhm, yea, but this needs a lot of polishing. :v
Smoother transitions, more reasonable explanations, a better match of the environment and the behaviour of characters. I don't mean to offend, but this is very clearly not thought through properly and I was tempted to close my browser tab at the point of being hired as a Royal Advisor off the street...excuse me, but like, what? XD Why? Do these people WANT to be assassinated? Just write that we have a contact in the court already, who enjoys the trust of one of the royals, and they make sure we get in
Hey, thanks for answering and not being offended by my bluntness! :v
I didn't clock that it is a time period thing; I guess cause that would usually be old English or in this case, simply old German? It's an interesting approach, but one to reconsider I think!
Sorry about that, I think people speculate so much because the influence of another language on your writing is very strong, and it makes them curious!
Cheers, and keep up the good work! :x
All I have to say is this:
Was my comment condescending? Yes, I was a bit of an asshat. I left all my comments on, because I didn't want to pretend I wasn't.
BUT: I don't allow myself to say anything nearly as mean or non-sensical as y'all do, or to devolve into such emotional vomiting one can see all over here.
Half the time I feel like people who answer my comment are talking to someone else (my image washed together with mean critics of the past or straight up imaginary ones, I can only guess), and about stuff I did not say at all (e.g.: "I will shut the fuck up, when...") That was actually one of you, who wrote that
Calling my original comment 'cruel' is ridiculous. If you think that's cruel, I don't know what to say. It wasn't kind, I can sign for that. (Btw, are you acting like the paragons of kindness here? Oh, of course, you're better than me, more supportive than me, so you are allowed to be mean to someone else while white-knighting, straw-manning and cursing. I see, alright, my bad.)
All in all: will you look at yourselves and your comments for a second please? You feeling righteous makes you do worse things than I did. Stop spiralling, egging each other on and making epic drama where there is none.
Bless y'all
Ps.:
I'm not going to answer to anything here anymore, as I'm sure none of you bother to try to understand where I'm coming from. You seem extremely happy in your self-righteous outrage circle. Have fun, but know this: you are doing the same, and worse things, which you are stoning me for
Yikes, I didn't mean to obliterate your will to write, sorry about that! :I
I get a bit, uh, riled up when I see something that could be good but isn't; it frustrates me in a weird way and then I might leave critiques without pulling my punches...with that said, I'm not taking any of it back, 'cause I think my points are valid
As I said before, and I chose these words deliberately: you're "an inexperienced writer", not a talentless one. And as you're aware, you lack skill. You do, but - while outsourcing your writing may be the more sensible option - is that what you really want?
Won't you try to get better instead?
I - could assist you. I'm not ghost-writing for anyone, but I can advise you about your writing and discuss plotholes, inconsistencies, POVs, style, rhythm etc.
Keep in mind, English is my second language, so I'm less likely to be able to help you there
Mr. Clipboard comes to the rescue, lookit' :
"I second this, the whole thing could be half as long with the same effect :v It made me skim over quite a few paragraphs!
Also, there are statements which kind of contradict each other, stuff like (I'm paraphrasing here): "he wouldn't mind his flirtations, if he wasn't responsible for his bro's accident" then "he despised his blatant flirtatiousness". So, which is it? He does not mind it too much or he hates it?
Another thing, there's no need to explain to us that Roman and Alphonse speak in code, we're not idiots XD We've already been informed he's getting bodies from somewhere, and from the nature of the conversation on the phone it's pretty clear what's up. The classic law of SHOW NOT TELL applies. I immediately felt "this is an inexperienced writer", which is fine, of course, but it's like watching someone miss a slam-dunk live, a bit of a bummer
Bonus: the tone of the text could be way more casual; a more everyday colloquial style fits the story more IMO, but this is also a matter of preference. I feel it was probably as much of a disservice to your story to use AI, as help.
Cool idea tho! :v "