Why are you so invested exactly? It just seems like you are trying to pick a fight where there isn't one.
Avoiding the question entirely I see. You're just a concern troll who wants to stir the pot because you don't like certain content.
"Yeah, that vocal minority insisting on seeing two men go at it in a game about the player and Anna is kind of odd to me as well. It sort of matches the world setting, so I can sort of understand why it's there in this case. It could probably also just be its own game, though, if we're being fair."
"The very obvious solution with including kinks in your game is usually to just make an alternate version of the kink scenes with an option to toggle the content if you want. Making that content is a big time sink already and having most of the people just not even engage with that content only makes it a bit of a waste of time otherwise."
Ah, you did say what you really think before. The content is purely optional, but that isn't enough for you, you just don't want it to exist at all.
This is a situation where you, yet again I should add, completely disregard the content of the conversation and start nitpicking to attempt to create some sort of 'gotcha' moment instead of actually adding to the conversation. The statement isn't going to change just because I happen to refer to different content than you had in mind.
Did you create that account just to troll and sow discord and hatred or something? With every comment you post, that seems to become increasingly more true at least.
If you insist on an answer, though, I don't mind answering your question. I'm not avoiding anything at all. I'm a functional adult capable of debate, and I don't mind being corrected if I'm wrong. In fact, learning opportunities like that are usually welcomed. You should maybe try joining the debate sometimes.
----
There are multiple niche fetishes present. There are several -dere types in the game; there is a sweaty, greasy tomboy and robot sex, etc. too. Not all of those are for everybody. So yes, I was more general for a reason. These ones are somewhat agreeable to the general population, though.
For the averse bit I was, however, mainly referring to, as just about everybody knows and it didn't really need saying, the hermaphrodite content. Or rather, what is wrongly tagged as 'hermaphrodite' (yes, that's what 'futanari' refers to) and is actually just gay/shemale/trans content, as they don't have both sexes but only have male sex organs.
The people that consume futa and/or gay/trans content make up a highly niche single-digit percentage of the adult population. In other words, well over 90% of the population does not enjoy that content or does not willingly seek it out at the very least.
There is nothing wrong with liking that content, of course, you do you. Nobody is judging here. It is simply the reality of the situation that it is not everybody's cup of tea.
p.s. "The content is purely optional, but that isn't enough for you, you just don't want it to exist at all." I pity you if that is what you got out of my previous statement. Content being optional is the same as it not existing already if you're not into that type of content. That was the point I was making back then. It's simply a bit of a waste for that content to be optional when it could be enjoyed by everybody if there were alternative versions. It's not the same at all. Also, for the record, it wasn't always optional. 😅
"There is nothing wrong with liking that content, of course, you do you. Nobody is judging here. It is simply the reality of the situation that it is not everybody's cup of tea."
You contradict your previous statement. "It could probably also just be its own game, though, if we're being fair." What's "fair" about it not being in this game? This implies its existence in this game is unfair.
"The very obvious solution with including kinks in your game is usually to just make an alternate version of the kink scenes with an option to toggle the content if you want."
Why is this obvious? Why should there be versions of certain characters just to cater to people who dislike their existence in the game? Why just, not do those character's content? A tad hypocritical of you to bemoan the development of the update, yet endorse creating alternatives for certain characters.
"That was the point I was making back then. It's simply a bit of a waste for that content to be optional when it could be enjoyed by everybody if there were alternative versions."
I'm not going to get into the terminology debate, I don't care for it. But this is vile. The characters have been designed to be what they are. "Just change the gay character into a woman." There is one femboy, and 3 futas that have content. (I'm sure you'll mention the Starmaker page for Rose as well.) You have claimed "As for the 'more content' a lot of it has historically been catered to a very small minority shouting loudly on discord to have it." You never quantified what amount of "more content" exactly, it's a very small percentage of the full game.
"It's not the same at all. Also, for the record, it wasn't always optional."
I assume you're referring to the spotting minigame? So simply seeing the characters is bad, I understand.
Also claiming nobody is judging futa and femboy content is at best ignorant and more than likely purely disingenuous.