Skip to main content

Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
TagsGame Engines
(1 edit)

1st of: What is wrong with you? Who hurt you? You are trying your hardest to nitpick at things to find something to critique and hate when in reality there isn't anything there. At the very least you used arguments, for which I commend you.

"This implies its existence in this game is unfair. " => No it does not in fact imply that. A 'fair judgement' is an impartial, unbiased decision based purely on facts rather than personal feelings or prejudices. I said 'it could be it's own game.' Is this not a fair and accurate statement? There is certainly enough quality content for it etc. If you don't think that is fair( thus think it is unfair), then you are arguing that it couldn't be it's own game, for whatever reason you might have for that. It has nothing to do with the existence of anything.

"Why is this obvious? " => Because if there is alternate versions of the scenes EVERYBODY gets more scenes. Did you forget that creating extra scenes doesn't only go one way perhaps? There would obviously be more scenes with the kink as well for other characters.

"I'm not going to get into the terminology debate, I don't care for it. But this is vile. The characters have been designed to be what they are." => What do you even mean by that? They were created to be living in an alternate universe already. So you believe in this one character in this one universe only but not in subsequent alternate universes with other version of the character? How do you feel about many of them having gone through changes during development then? 🤨 Technically every choice you make in game is in itself already another alternate universe as well. Are the ending characters not the real characters either then aside from the 'true ending' ones? These characters already aren't designed to simply be one single way or the other from the get-go. The players essentially design and shape them throughout the game. So by your logic the developer and everybody playing, including yourself is vile.

I read books quite often, I'm already part of thousands of alternate universes, one more doesn't really rattle my chain. I'm sorry I'm not emotionally attached enough to only believe in a single alternate universe in a single game I suppose? I really wonder why you are this emotionally invested though, genuinely.

"I assume you're referring to the spotting minigame? So simply seeing the characters is bad, I understand. " => No, you clearly do not. It is not really about seeing the characters, it is more about expectations and them being subverted. But I suppose it could be for some. It's a physiological response for a reason.

"Also claiming nobody is judging futa and femboy content is at best ignorant and more than likely purely disingenuous." => I never made this claim and I'm not sure why you're bringing it up. Is it because I said 'nobody is judging here' in reference to our conversations and you somehow assumed I was speaking for everybody here? I'll rephrase in that case: 'I'm not judging'.

Edit: For the record: Judging is a cognitive process of evaluating something based on criteria. Liking is the emotional or preferential response. They aren't 'judging' the content, they are disliking it. 

Can I ask though, why are you trying so hard to hate on me for giving genuine, logical advice (critique at times, I suppose) based on facts, devoid of emotion? I've been nothing but nice and polite, yet you're slinging nothing but unfounded hate towards me. It truly perplexes me. I'm sure there are plenty of more deserving people out there.

" I said 'it could be it's own game.' Is this not a fair and accurate statement?" Again, implies they don't belong in THIS game. You can try and dilute your point and use soft language all you want. You're still singling out the futa and femboy characters.  "It could probably also just be its own game, though, if we're being fair." You're differentiating certain content as not belonging/fitting into Starmaker. 

"These characters already aren't designed to simply be one single way or the other from the get-go." What? You're claiming the futa and femboy characters weren't designed to be futas and femboys from the get go? Prove it.

"What do you even mean by that?" I like how you completely ignore the example I use of "turn the gay man into a woman." Just toggle all the LGBT stuff, that would be "fair" after all. That stuff "could probably also just be its OWN game, though, if we're being fair."

"It is not really about seeing the characters, it is more about expectations and them being subverted." What expectations? Phoenix is on the Itch page. Arvus games has had futa and femboys since Adorevia. And yes, asking for a toggle/alternatives objectively means seeing them is bad/not wanted. It's basically an arachnophobia toggle. But, you know, for futa and femboys. 

"They aren't 'judging' the content, they are disliking it. " It being optional isn't enough though, they don't want the characters to be in the game at all. They want the characters to be toggleable. Simply seeing them is bad.

The mental gymnastics you're doing to downplay this is impressive.