He just had to change his banner to something that didn't make Elon cry.
RiverXPhoenix
Recent community posts
" I said 'it could be it's own game.' Is this not a fair and accurate statement?" Again, implies they don't belong in THIS game. You can try and dilute your point and use soft language all you want. You're still singling out the futa and femboy characters. "It could probably also just be its own game, though, if we're being fair." You're differentiating certain content as not belonging/fitting into Starmaker.
"These characters already aren't designed to simply be one single way or the other from the get-go." What? You're claiming the futa and femboy characters weren't designed to be futas and femboys from the get go? Prove it.
"What do you even mean by that?" I like how you completely ignore the example I use of "turn the gay man into a woman." Just toggle all the LGBT stuff, that would be "fair" after all. That stuff "could probably also just be its OWN game, though, if we're being fair."
"It is not really about seeing the characters, it is more about expectations and them being subverted." What expectations? Phoenix is on the Itch page. Arvus games has had futa and femboys since Adorevia. And yes, asking for a toggle/alternatives objectively means seeing them is bad/not wanted. It's basically an arachnophobia toggle. But, you know, for futa and femboys.
"They aren't 'judging' the content, they are disliking it. " It being optional isn't enough though, they don't want the characters to be in the game at all. They want the characters to be toggleable. Simply seeing them is bad.
The mental gymnastics you're doing to downplay this is impressive.
"There is nothing wrong with liking that content, of course, you do you. Nobody is judging here. It is simply the reality of the situation that it is not everybody's cup of tea."
You contradict your previous statement. "It could probably also just be its own game, though, if we're being fair." What's "fair" about it not being in this game? This implies its existence in this game is unfair.
"The very obvious solution with including kinks in your game is usually to just make an alternate version of the kink scenes with an option to toggle the content if you want."
Why is this obvious? Why should there be versions of certain characters just to cater to people who dislike their existence in the game? Why just, not do those character's content? A tad hypocritical of you to bemoan the development of the update, yet endorse creating alternatives for certain characters.
"That was the point I was making back then. It's simply a bit of a waste for that content to be optional when it could be enjoyed by everybody if there were alternative versions."
I'm not going to get into the terminology debate, I don't care for it. But this is vile. The characters have been designed to be what they are. "Just change the gay character into a woman." There is one femboy, and 3 futas that have content. (I'm sure you'll mention the Starmaker page for Rose as well.) You have claimed "As for the 'more content' a lot of it has historically been catered to a very small minority shouting loudly on discord to have it." You never quantified what amount of "more content" exactly, it's a very small percentage of the full game.
"It's not the same at all. Also, for the record, it wasn't always optional."
I assume you're referring to the spotting minigame? So simply seeing the characters is bad, I understand.
Also claiming nobody is judging futa and femboy content is at best ignorant and more than likely purely disingenuous.
Avoiding the question entirely I see. You're just a concern troll who wants to stir the pot because you don't like certain content.
"Yeah, that vocal minority insisting on seeing two men go at it in a game about the player and Anna is kind of odd to me as well. It sort of matches the world setting, so I can sort of understand why it's there in this case. It could probably also just be its own game, though, if we're being fair."
"The very obvious solution with including kinks in your game is usually to just make an alternate version of the kink scenes with an option to toggle the content if you want. Making that content is a big time sink already and having most of the people just not even engage with that content only makes it a bit of a waste of time otherwise."
Ah, you did say what you really think before. The content is purely optional, but that isn't enough for you, you just don't want it to exist at all.
"As for the 'more content' a lot of it has historically been catered to a very small minority shouting loudly on discord to have it. The majority of players might not ever even interact with it (or be averse to it)."
Being very vague here, why not be honest and actually quantify and say what you mean by this instead of using open ended soft terms?
He's disputing the fact that it's free though, so the premise of his complaints is flawed from the start. And the fact that it is free, means IMO dooming about the game is a particular kind of cringe "I'm not getting this free product fast enough." It's insanely entitled, juvenile, and just bad form. 8 numbered updates, and loads of lettered updates not enough to generate goodwill for the dev?
"Okay, it's free. If that point is supposed to end every criticism, then disable the Patreon button and remove every mention of donations from your fully free game. If money truly doesn't matter, that shouldn't be an issue."
None of those change the fact it's free, people can download it and play it for free. People can choose to support the dev as well. You're not making any sense, should just bail now tbh.
Uh oh melty. It's free, so if you subscribe it's not on the promise of getting it early, or even getting it at all, because it's free. It's just to show appreciation. So subscribing does not in fact render the "it's free" argument wrong. You're just REEEEEEEING on the internet about a free product, hope your life gets better lil bro.