Can you tell me what version of Windows you're using or what is the error you're getting?
edit: If it was a missing DLL error, then that should be fixed now.
Hi there! It's hard to say without seeing your setup. What's your population and daily income? Certainly it's not balanced ideally but it should be possible to generate 100-200 per day without too much effort. But I haven't played the original version lately.
edit: You're probably not missing anything. It's a very small and simplistic game :)
Hmm, that is strange. I don't see how save files and audio would be connected. What happens if you don't delete the save file and try opening the game a few more times. Does it mess up the audio every time? Windows or Mac?
I'm glad you like it! You may be happy to hear I'm still working on it and the full game might be coming out soon (spring/summer-ish).
When clicking on trees, click on their base (ground tile) rather than where they are visually. What might happen is that you click on the tile behind the tree instead, which is probably empty and giving you the camp option.
Hey everyone, thanks for voting and commenting! Your interest in this little jam entry and all the lets play videos you guys made really blew me away. Real proud of third place and the end-result. Thanks again
Thanks for the comments and feedback! Some really valid points have been raised.
Time update is something I want to keep constant for now (1 click = 1 day). I've been thinking about ways to upgrade build speeds, most likely by building some auxiliary buildings. Not a fan of arbitrary number upgrades. I'm thinking more along the lines of having your city hall and opening new departments there that will affect different aspects of the game. Eg. opening a building/zoning department to decrease build times.
Good point, I'll get to that as soon as possible. The allocation is a bit wonky, sure. It works opposite how it should - water towers/shops/factories search of nearby houses rather than each house finding the nearest structure to cover its needs. So the shop each house ends up with may not be the nearest and most optimal. That was just simpler to implement in the short timeframe of the jam.
Definitely the most clicker-y clicker game from this jam I've played. Looks absolutely gorgeous! Love your pixel-art skill. I do wish there were more sounds other than the music. Would've made the clicking more juicy. A simple idea executed well.
Had a couple of weird hangs at some point. The game didn't crash but became unresponsive for about 10-15 seconds.
A very different take on the clicker idea. Looks great and the music is really good as well. The collision detection was a little wonky at times, I thought I was picking up crops but it picked up the rock instead. Exactly what point of the player needs to be on the tile of the object should be highlighted, I feel.
Does it also crash when you open a city and just let the game run and not play? If so, then yes, it must be some sort of graphics/driver issue since no game logic is run unless you click stuff.
I found an old piece of a junk laptop with integrated graphics where it runs fine. But it doesn't have Windows 10. I'll have to see if I can upgrade somehow.
Thank you! That is a really weird bug that's popping up for some players. Could be a memory leak indeed. It's interesting that it's around 15 minutes for everybody who gets this crash (I don't). I will try and get my older laptop running tomorrow just to test it out on a different machine and see if I can get it to crash.
What sort of machine are you running this on? What version of Windows, how much RAM and what graphics card/built-in chip do you have? And is the post-processing effect enabled by any chance? And if you can, please tell me how much memory the game is using according to Task Manager when you play.
That's a bug. Got it fixed now. Thanks for reporting! It happens because there is a threshold of 50 buildings where waste management is unlocked. Any building beyond that will start increasing that expense. What was unhandled was when building amount went below 50 after that feature was already unlocked.
1) Strange. Will look into and fix.
2) Right now, yes. There are couple of things regarding landfills/waste that could be implemented in the future:
3) That decision was deliberate although there don't seem to be any advantages to that right now. Once flats became available there was no reason to build smaller houses any more and I didn't really like that. In the future different housings would affect different social classes which in turn will affect employment (need lower class population to work in the factories etc.). At that point housing demand effect could be evened out or lowered because that will be managed by employment needs and so on. Not sure if you could build a city of just flats... probably.
Thanks for playtesting and excellent feedback! This really helps me.
Sorry, you can't use the old save file. In additon to bunch of new data in the file, the game balance and features where changed in a way that your old city would not make sense in the new version, if it worked at all. I will try keeping breaking changes like that to minimal in the future.
Can you please provide me with your save file? Either you can put the file somewhere or just copy the plain-text contents to Pastebin or somewhere similar. Save files are in the "saves" directory in the root of the game directory. That would make reproducing that easier hopefully. Thank you.
I think you're on pretty good track. I would lose the park at early stages and use trees where possible unless you really want 3 star rating (which I made more difficult to achieve) and upper class residents. Right now upper class is mostly useful if you want to produce and sell luxury items.
1) [edit: FIXED] Yes, if a house is vacant it costs negative rent. Since it happens rarely I never noticed. It should be something like -1 instead I think.
2) [edit: FIXED] Yes, but then you're missing a lot of factory income and won't be making positive income most likely. The general idea is that you set the price at which those goods are sold in your city. There is demand and everything you don't produce (or don't produce enough) will be imported. But it looks like there are some issues. Looking into it. It should probably actually work like this:
There is demand. Demand is controlled by the price you set. When you don't produce some item, it will be imported but at a higher price. If you overproduce that will go to waste (finacially).
3) [edit: FIXED] Will check it out.
4) [edit: FIXED] There is an extra cost of piping (+1 cost for every 5 pieces of road). I will add short description text for each of the expense rows.
5) Interesting. Most likely the market your house considers nearest is already full by the time it gets to that house.
Indeed, it was bugged and has been fixed now. Expect a new release this weekend. Now each house is allocated to the nearest shop/job/water unless some other houses have filled it already, in which case it looks for the next nearest location.
Sorry this messed things up. But you make a fair point. Similar thing will happen with fire stations and hospitals. I can add a timeframe (lets say 6 months starting from the unlock), after which the crime effect comes into play. But should the police stations/fire department/hospital bleed money daily during that period? I think they should, to offset the 'generous' grace period.
If it doesn't crash on launch but shows a white screen then updating your video card drivers is what's generally recommended. Can you please try that? What version of Windows/OSX are you on?
Balance is tricky, yes. For me this does not seem very difficult but for newer players, sure. Shop is not suitable for starting out, it has a max. of 50 shoppers so you need 25 just to be neutral. I've tested and it's doable when you build a market (15 shoppers) and just enough houses to support it and up the rent where possible. Initial house placement is important - you gotta have as much trees next to houses as possible so you can easily up the rent to 4. If you can increase the rent for all houses that's a winner situation.