Skip to main content

On Sale: GamesAssetsToolsTabletopComics
Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
TagsGame Engines

XCVG

1,029
Posts
3
Topics
72
Followers
45
Following
A member registered Jan 03, 2016 · View creator page →

Creator of

Recent community posts

Thanks for playing!

I do touch on this a bit in the devlog, but deep lore and worldbuilding has basically just been kicked down the road again. There's really not a lot to try to be consistent with, but feel free to message me if you need clarification on anything.

There are definitely bugs and shortcomings. This is something I sort of cover in the devlog, but development was rushed and it was really shoved out the door with minimal testing.

While it's cut down from the original concept, I'm happy that I was able to keep the globe-trotting feel intact, as well as trying different gameplay ideas. I don't know if this is going to be the last game in the series (I'll get back to this in a bit), but I was trying to treat it as Gina's last hurrah.

I probably should have switched up the controls in the motorcycle sequence. I think all but one of the people who tried it have been thrown by them.

Was it the hospital scene that was "too real"?

This is the first game where you can only use magic with one-handed weapons. It's a compromise between the previous games which either allowed you to use magic all the time or didn't have magic at all. It also makes animating the weapons slightly easier. This definitely could have been explained better, I think there's only a mention in the ingame help.

Did you suggest a title when I was soliciting those? That might be the reason for the special thanks, either that or for testing it during the first jam.

Will this be the last Outliers game? I do answer this in the devlog, but I'll paraphrase it here: I don't think so, but it'll be the last one for a while, and it might be the last big one. I still have a lot of ideas in my head, including of course what the epilogue could lead into, but I also really don't want to take on another project like this any time soon.

It's ambitious, but it's pretty rough at the moment. I absolutely love the concept/key art, but the game itself feels a bit bland and very empty. The premise is potentially interesting, but there isn't enough story in the demo to really get into it. I have mixed feelings on the mazelike maps- they're annoying to navigate, but do contribute to the dreamlike feel. Voice acting is always fun to see, and it's too bad it's not complete here.

I am excited for what this game could be, but it just doesn't feel like it's there yet.

The devlog is thin but gets the point across. Ultimately, I don't want to come down too harshly on this game, because I've been in slumps before. Sometimes you need to step away for a while and come back later, and that's okay.

As someone who can't multitask, including in games, the premise of this game made me really nervous. I ended up really liking the gameplay, though. The attention indicators really helped, and overall it struck a good balance between being chill and having some challenge.

I really love the art, it's so cute and goes together nicely. I do agree that the protagonist looks a bit sad. The sound, music, and overall presentation is great.

There are a few bugs. The  I won with knowledge, and got a weird "you won, but the script doesn't know why" message. I played the web version, maybe the desktop one is better.

As per your request, I have refrained from rating the game. I still would have loved to read a devlog, though.

I'm split on this one. I really like the art, the style, and the overall presentation, but I'm not so hot on the gameplay.

I found it really confusing overall. I don't really know baseball, so I can chalk up being confused about the scoring to that, but I'm really not sure how the timing is supposed to work for either swing and catch. I tried to time it so that the circle matched the size it was initially shown at, which sometimes worked. I'm also not sure what moving the target does when pitching, or how to hit the ball so that it is or isn't caught. I did win the game, but it felt like I stumbled into it.

The magical girl transformation is an especially neat touch.

The intro just goes on and on, and the text isn't skippable, which was pretty frustrating. If the game was longer, it would be less egregious, but in that case I still think it would be better to spread things out a little.

Not much to say about the devlog, it's pretty minimal.

Also, for some reason the itch.io app can't download this game. That's probably a bug in either the app or the website, though.

This is one of the games I shortlisted to try during MGGJ10, but unfortunately I couldn't get to it then. It's definitely one of the longer entries to that jam, and I played a good chunk of it but didn't finish the whole demo this time.

An 8-bit style feels uncanny in an RPG Maker game- it's hardly the first, but something about knowing what tech stack it's actually running on throws off my strange mind- but it's very well executed here. Weirdly, it feels more like some kinda DOS shareware than a console game, but maybe that's just my own nostalgia talking.

I'm surprised by how much I like the story, because I didn't really think it would be my thing. Usually I like my stories edgy to a fault. But I love the humour and the use of speaker names like "Winston are you sure about this".

I don't love how long it takes to get to any gameplay section. There's Story Skip for people who've played it before, but as a new player it feels like a bandaid, and I wish there was some integration here with some minigames, or introducing some of the mechanics before the story, or something.

It's a long, gently paced game overall, and that's something I have mixed feelings about. It's not a bad thing, and has a depth to it that a shorter game wouldn't, but these days I just don't have the time to dive deep.

Mechanically, it seems pretty conventional in general, but I do like the explanation of where items come from, and the skill tree system.

I lost the first team fight, but it continued as if I won, which was weird. I did see in the devlog that there are concessions to this in the demo version, though.

I never played the original version, but I was kinda surprised to see how many of the things I saw were new additions. It feels polished enough, and I remember the original screenshots looking final enough, that I kinda assumed it was mostly complete from the beginning.

I really like that the devlog has both regular updates (though I didn't keep up with them) and a concluding entry that sums them all up. It talks a lot about what was added, and why, which is great, but I do wish it got into the process more, the challenges in creation, what went well and what didn't.

The stage in the game sounds like it should be a tutorial stage, and I didn't even make it halfway. It definitely feels like a Song of Morus game, not just because of the difficulty but the graphics translate well to 8-bit. It's a shame about the technical issues, as everything seems to be working well except for that one unsolvable problem.

I finally got to trying this after having it saved for months. It's definitely a stand-out entry.

Some of the sound effects felt odd, but that's the only flaw in the presentation I can think of. The mixed graphics styles weirdly seem to work. It looks good overall.

I'm not sure if picking different options doesn't matter, or if I just got lucky, since every approach seemed to be effective. 

I did not get far, though. I struggle with bullet hells to begin with, and the difficulty ramp was just too much. I could manage the first two avoidance stages, but the third with combined attacks was just too much.

Healing feels pointless, since you have to do the same avoidance stage as far as I can tell, and you don't gain enough health from it to catch up if you're falling behind. 

Between the avoidance stages, negotiation mechanic, and overall themes it feels reminiscent of Undertale. I wasn't personally a fan of the gameplay, but I think it's a strong combination. The description hints at further depths, but I didn't get far enough to see them.

Finally got to playing this one. It's rough around the edges, but it's explicitly marked as a prototype, so that wasn't unexpected.

I like the idea of the story, but it dumps way too much lore way too fast. It falls into the fantasy worldbuilding trap of heaping a ton of capital letters in-universe terms on me all at once, and none of them mean anything to me. Less is more here, we don't need everything up front.

Like I said, I do like the concept of the story, and I like how things are revealed to you as you advance. The image of the Mother slowly revealing itself was a simple, but neat trick.

The gameplay I'm not sold on. Auto-targeting means you're basically just hammering the mouse button and avoiding enemies, which is pretty dull. Maybe more things could be added to change things up. Judging by the (debug?) buttons in the corner, it looks like more was planned.

I think this might have received more attention if the game page showed some screenshots and talked about the gameplay more, but it's two months too late for that.

Thanks for playing!

It shouldn't be possible to end up in the water at any point in the Jungle mission, so there's definitely a missing invisible wall somewhere.

It's possible to kick Sakura out of the way. Usually. IIRC that level ends once the bad guys are dead, though, even if you can't make it to the end.

There actually is supposed to be a save point between the museum and the forest, so that is a bug/oversight.

Not a Vox Machina reference, just named by scrolling through synonyms until I found one suitably foreboding and fantasy-sounding. I suspect their process was similar.

Katya is a character that I wanted to do so much more with. She's the hero of another story, but in the end it was reduced to a brief appearance in the final level and two brief dialogues.

I love the concept and the art. Hali's design is great, and I especially like the little laundry-pod emblem detail.

The gameplay is really clunky, though. It's both very difficult to avoid damage and to tell what can damage you and is damaging you. Movement is okay, but feels very floaty.

I loved the visuals and concept of this game, especially the character designs, but I could not get a hold of the gameplay. I'm not great at this type of game to begin with, but for whatever reason I found the split control scheme even more awkward.

It's a short and sweet little VN! There's lots of great art in this one and I really liked the style.

I do think the writing could be tightened up a bit, and the story felt a bit rushed at times, but it still gets its points across, and I definitely prefer keeping the pace fast to getting bogged down.

The shooting minigame is pretty clunky, but I don't think I've ever seen a Ren'py minigame that isn't, and having that bit of gameplay is definitely appreciated.

Finally had a chance to give this one a try. I was really excited for it, and overall I did enjoy it.

The style is unusual, but surprisingly compelling. The environments are surreal and oversized, but combined with the grotesque enemies and eerie music gives the whole game a creepy, foreboding vibe. The bright, cheery magical girls and UI clash with that, but I think that's the point. I wasn't expecting story coming in, but I was pleasantly surprised. It's kinda cliche, but reminiscent of some of my favourites from jams past and works well enough to drive the story.

Ultimately, it's heavily let down by the gameplay. It's so, so clunky and unsatisfying. Movement is slow and strafing kills momentum in a way that just feels awful. Nothing has any weight or impact, not the floaty damage-on-hit enemies or your hitscan weapon or the bosses with more complex patterns. Having to farm kills from respawning enemies gets old fast, and everything just clips through most (all?) of the walls. The bosses aren't really difficult- basically circle strafe and hammer LMB- but some spawn you right in the middle of enemies, which just eats your health before you have a chance to react.

Amusingly, it's possible to flip the camera all the way around so everything is upside down and backwards, and the mouse look is so sensitive that I managed to do that by accident within 5 seconds of starting the game.

It does have a weird naive charm to it. It feels like a first person shooter re-derived from first principles without reference to anything else. At the same time, I think it would have been much more fun to play if it had avoided the mistakes it made.

This sounds like damning by faint praise- and yeah, it kinda is- but I do appreciate that the game doesn't overstay its welcome. I think parts of it could be fleshed out a bit more, but in its current state it's concise enough that the flaws don't get too grating and the game doesn't get frustrating. 

I'm a sucker for first-person shooters, and I'd be impressed just to see a functional one, but this is more than just functional. Even though the weapons are basically jokes, it feels surprisingly good. Movement is fluid and the tilt effect  

I'm not sure if I really like the visual style, but it certainly is unique. It's an eclectic mix, with picture of a hand, a bit of pixel art, bold environments and dramatic shader effects, but it feels retro overall.

That being said, I don't think the super dark environments where you can't see three feet in front of you without using your weapons as a makeshift flashlight were a good choice. They just made my eyes hurt, and were frustrating to play. The platforming section in the dark in Chapter 3 kinda broke me.

The minimal sound design is another thing where it's distinctive, but I don't know if I'm really into it. I think I'd personally prefer music and more sound effects for doors, enemy alert, etc.

Of all things, it almost feels like a weird DOOM WAD, and I'm almost surprised it isn't given how much it nails the 90s style.

Are those June's non-magical friends we finally saw?

The art is beautiful, the music and sounds are spot-on, and it feels very polished overall. I do like the comic/manga art style and the story sequences work very well.

The combat was... meh. It's not awful, and I did get used to it, but it never stopped feeling clunky. The hitboxes aren't super clear, and once you start attacking, you're committed. I played on Easy, and I think the difficulty is right where it should be.

The game was shorter than I expected, and the ending was maybe a bit abrupt, but it packed a lot of explaining both June's background and the world in there. I haven't been following the development, but I think this was probably a more sane scope than some of the previous titles for a jam game.

World Tree is the next big installment that's been hinted at for a while, right?

Well, that was... a thing. I managed to get all four endings without too much difficulty, and I think the length and amount of branching is just about perfect. It pushes you to explore every path but doesn't stick around so long it gets stale.

I absolutely love the visual style, sound design, and and overall presentation of this game, and it feels so perfect for SBIG Jam. The weird, backwards parallax sky is a particular highlight.

The humour, to be honest, didn't land for me personally- in particular the sarcastic "you suck" after losing the fishing minigame just made me not want to play- but I think others will love it. 

There's quite a bit of game here, and despite (or perhaps because of) the frustration factor I think you could amuse yourself for a good while, but I think ultimately its length will work against it. I'm not even sure how to get to the boss lobsters, and getting all the upgrades feels like it's  going to take forever. I'm speculating, though, because I didn't have time to play more than a few minutes.

I still have never played Vampire Survivors, but I've played a lot of clones. This one was pretty fun and definitely hits the right notes. I think the brevity works for it- there isn't a ton of depth here, and the simplistic graphics and silly sounds might get annoying in a game that drags on, but in something short and sweet they stay amusing.

It's an interesting concept, though I'm not sure if it really fits SBIG Jam. It really feels more like a kind of experimental art game than something so bad it's good.

As for my experience, I didn't make it past the first minigame. The bullet hell battles were my least favourite part of Undertale, and the version here seemed even more brutal than those.

I can immediately tell this is an instant-classic SBIG Jam entry at a glance. The art style, sound design, and overall jankiness hit the perfect notes.

Honestly, I think the length and complexity is perfect as-is. It sticks around long enough to be a good bit of fun but not so long that it starts to drag on, and the difficulty hits a solid balance of having some challenge and tension but not devolving into a tedious chore.

I think my one criticism is that the modifier implementation feels weak to me. I see what the intent is, and while it's certainly extensive, it doesn't really cross into excessive territory in my mind.

There's no question this game is clunky. The WASD+E controls are awkward, the dialogue system is at best clunky and at worst outright bugged, and there are no niceties like a quest log or visible inventory. Yet I was drawn in by the weird, wacky world, bizarre concept, and biting humour. It seems to be a game consisting entirely of sidequests, which is brilliant. I think the only real issue I had was that the audio mixing really crushes the voice lines, which is a shame. I really wish I had time to give this a proper playthrough, and I might come back to it after the jam.

This one is a weird one for me. It's so close to being amazing, with just a few minor things holding it back, but I'm not sure if it's so bad it's good at all.

A music-driven infinite lane runner is a safe bet, and the core mechanics work pretty well. It's not really the kind of game I go chasing down, but I enjoyed my time with it. I do have trouble with eyestrain in certain kinds of games, and unfortunately this is one of them and I couldn't play for very long. The excessive postprocessing definitely made it worse. I found the view angle unnatural and I wish it was a bit flatter and lower down, but I'm not sure if that contributed to eyestrain or not.

For some reason, the music would sometimes cut out and the score stop counting up. I think this is a gameplay mechanic, but I'm not sure exactly how it works. I think it needs to be just a smidgen more clearly telegraphed.

After thirty seconds I remembered why I use nano.

It's an interesting idea, but I'm not sure if it makes for a fun game. It is, if nothing else, suitably cursed for this jam.

I didn't, but I just looked, and it didn't really give me anything I hadn't figured out myself, other than putting a few names to thing. I think the biggest issue is that the game is so lo-fi I can't really make out what's a turret and when I'm being attacked.

I like the concept of this one, I'm not sure if it's been done before but a piano clicker game just seems like such a natural fit. There's a few issues with the execution: the upgrades feel unbalanced, the last two seem to do the exact same thing, sometimes upgrades don't go through, and (perhaps most significantly) the autoplay just plays all the notes every second instead of playing something music-like that increases in tempo with the upgrades (what I thought it would do). Despite its flaws, it had my attention for a lot longer than I thought it would.

Really neat idea, but I don't have anywhere close to the level of coordination to play this game. It definitely has a puzzle element to it; is it right to call it a puzzle platformer?

This feels more like a parody of rhythm games than an actual rhythm game to me, but, y'know, it kind of works.

The graphical style and general concept is a perfect fit for the jam, although the specific humour didn't quite land for me. Unfortunately, I found the game to be literally unplayable because of the crazy high look sensitivity.

For a demo/wip, it feels surprisingly polished. I'm not personally a fan of the score attack style, but it works well enough.

I'm not sure how much of a so bad it's good game this is. The art style is unusual, but it looks really good, and the same goes for the sound effects.

It does make an interesting use of the modifier, though, and the audio cues work great in practice.

It's simple, minimalistic, and very easy to cheese, but somehow the jank and weirdness just works. The (homemade?) sounds are especially standout. Although the scoring seems to be broken, adding up runs rather than displaying the last run.

Thanks for playing!

Did I accidentally make corporate satire again?

The playback feature is something I wanted from the very beginning. Unfortunately, I couldn't really find a way to integrate it with the actual mechanics, and its kind of an "it's there if you want it" feature.

The missions were definitely designed in a hurry, and in hindsight I should have spent more time with those concepts. The game mechanics were built first, and the missions were tacked together around them.

Thanks for playing!

Items not being recognized as placed shouldn't be possible, but this has hardly gone through a full QC suite, so who knows. If I recall, the rapper level requires sufficient system power (ie more amplifiers), so that might have been an issue as well.

I kind of went back and forth on how janky I wanted the physics and controls to be, but in the end it was kind of decided by what was fastest/easiest to do. It seems that it somewhat worked out- there's definitely a spread of opinions in the comments.

This game is in a weird spot, because what's there is certainly impressive. Decent graphics and sounds, a big, detailed world to explore, several weapons, sidequests, sound mechanics. At the same time, though, it feels unfinished. The world is big and detailed, but there's not much to do in it. There's the beginnings of a gameplay loop with the safe zone, but nothing to do in it. The game is pretty open-ended, and I'm not sure what the end goal really is. I'm not sure if it was a deliberate game mechanic or not, but there was one enemy that kept chasing me that I couldn't kill. And there doesn't really seem to be any disadvantage to just switching to the assault rifle and laying into enemies, noise be damned.

Honestly, though, I think the only thing that's "so bad it's good" about this game is the absurd premise. It really does feel like a proper game that's just not quite finished.

It's a weird, experimental game. Is it so bad it's good? Not sure, to be honest. It has major art game vibes. I managed to get the dynamite, but then got stuck. I think there's definitely more to discover in this game, I just didn't have the time or patience to (sorry).

I'm not sure how much of a rhythm game it is, and it's bizarre in both concept and execution, but it definitely hits that niche of so bad it's good.

It's really buggy, for better or for worse. The first time I played, I got through the Easy level (with a score of F) and then every time I tried to play Medium it would After refreshing, it worked, and then I found out that I could rack up crazy scores by just mashing the keyboard.

I love the concept and style of this game, and though it's janky, the core mechanics work well and the weirdness doesn't take away from the game. I suck at platformers, though, and I didn't have the perseverance to keep going after repeatedly dying to the death throwers in the second level, then falling through the jumps at the top once I got past them.

What the actual hell is going on with the huge number of different downloads? I'm not sure if this is meant to be part of a bit, or if you guys are actually that disorganized. They're all horribly named, too, so I have no idea which one is which once I've downloaded them. Honestly, between that, the wall of text on the game page, and the 40 devlogs, I was starting to get soured on the game before I'd even played it. I can see why you guys though this would be funny, and I've done similar things in the past. The reality, though, is that I'm not invested enough in what to me is a random jam game to really engage, and that likely rings true for most players.

So, I gave up on all that and just played the version on the jam page.

I honestly have no idea how the game is supposed to work. Clicking cards would play them, but only sometimes, and I have no idea why. The card stats panel on the upper left doesn't seem to change. I lost one round, lost the second, and I have no idea why.

Unfortunately, I think this one falls on the "so bad it's terrible" side of that knife edge between that and "so bad it's good". The visual style is perfect, as is the audio, and the general concept is solid, but the gameplay is just too opaque and confusing. It's not clear how my actions as a player are mapping to things happening in the game or what any of the animations happening mean. I'm just left to randomly click buttons to maybe get an ending.

It's a neat concept, but I forgot what was what within about ten seconds of actually starting. I think the first level really needed fewer ingredients, maybe even just two or three, at least for me.

It's mildly amusing- I won't spoil it- but it's mildly amusing. The best thing I can say about it is that it's short enough that the joke doesn't wear out its welcome. That sounds like damning by faint praise, and in some ways it is, but it's something critical that a lot of SBIG jam games get wrong.

At first, I didn't realize E isn't jump, and kept dying. I'm still not sure why E does work as jump, but only sometimes. To be honest, I found the controls horribly awkward. I wish it was arrows to move; trying to play a platformer one-handed is incredibly awkward.

It also doesn't seem to have any audio. The weirdly realistic graphics work for SBIG, though.