"I believe these games stand out compared to what’s already on the market (they’re free)". What I meant is that I haven’t seen a game with the same gameplay mechanics as the way I programmed it, and that’s why it stands out—because it’s unique (two games in one). The snake graphic, which is the only thing made with AI, is for the game’s start screen, and I think it’s very good and necessary to have it there.
Regarding the installation issue, that’s something that makes me doubt—otherwise Google Play wouldn’t exist (unless you’re referring strictly to itch.io users). Either way, one thing is clear to me: this is not the place for Android games. As for: ‘If it makes you feel better, your game is currently ranked #16 out of 82,’ well, that doesn’t make me feel better. I would feel better if people downloaded it and installed it on their Android devices (as I imagine Android users do with every app and game they install from Google Play, where my games are also available). And then, after playing it, they could tell me, just as I started this post: ‘I liked it’ with reasons, ‘I didn’t like it’ with reasons, ‘Remove this, it’s useless,’ and above all, explain their arguments.
About writing the description with AI—of course! If it can describe my game better than I can (actually, my games, because I see people have only talked about one of them), then why not use it? What does that text, generated from an argument I gave the AI about my game, say that isn’t understandable or logical?
You ask me: ‘How many casual games with AI graphics have you installed on your phone lately? For fun, and not to check the competition?’ Well, I’ve searched, and honestly I’ve found very few, but I’d like to see more. I keep searching daily, because I focus on the fun it can give me—I don’t care whether it uses AI or not. I always give these two examples: The new game Arc Raider uses AI in its graphics and in several parts of its code, according to its developers, and because of that—does it make the game less fun or affect the user experience in any way? (In fact, as I said, it might even be the GOTY of 2025). Another example: If you suffered from idiopathic multicentric Castleman disease, and a healthcare professional using AI found a cure or something to improve your condition, wouldn’t you use it just because it was discovered with AI? And here’s proof: A machine learning tool managed to save the life of a patient with idiopathic multicentric Castleman disease, a rare condition with low survival rates and few treatment options. https://www.agenciasinc.es/Noticias/IA-y-enfermedades-raras-un-paso-revolucionar...
In the end, in my opinion, I simply started something at a time when many people are not yet ready for it. Maybe in a few years we’ll have this conversation again, and maybe then I won’t have to explain the obvious. (This has already happened in the past with EVERYTHING THAT CALLS FOR CHANGE). Thank you for your message, I’m glad to know your opinion.
