Having some more details on the jam ratings would be a huge help. I definitely understand, and agree, on not showing who gave the ratings, but I think seeing the un-associated ratings themselves could provide insight. For example a category like "Controls" got 2, 2, 2, 3, 4, 5, which averages to 3 but now I see that half the players did not like the controls at all, but a couple really did. Or it could have literally been all 3s so the controls are alright but not great.
Even just seeing the high and low would be interesting. Again, I totally understand wanting to prevent people from getting harassed but I think some more info can be given besides the raw and adjusted scores.
I couldn't find another topic and actually getting info on ratings, just about how to ratings are calculated so my apologies if my search skills aren't up to snuff.