It is really awesome to see the cc0 licensing. So inspiring.
The next project is going to use a Copy Left open licensing of GPL V3. An open license that will allow others to freely use the project. Video games could use more open source video game projects
GNU GPL V3 - https://www.gnu.org/licenses/quick-guide-gplv3.html
Only that they do not credit me with any derivatives that are made from it. If someone for instance decides to make a politically correct version of it for example, I want no association with it. Though I am worried about someone trying to claim it as their own and then they copyright the work, pretty much stealing it and locking everyone else out of it, if that makes sense.
Those are my concerns. Being credited for the original should be optional instead of a requirement so that rules out CC1.
I however do not like restrictions or unnecessary clauses or requirements, I do after all advocate for Copyleft and "Software freedom".
Only that they do not credit me with any derivatives that are made from it.
You can enforce that using a software license but that honestly is a trademark issue. The reason for credit to the original being enforced in all licenses but 0BSD because those licenses work via copyright which has to have a know author. 0BSD works via public domain. A different approach might be one which forces to highlight what changed. A really strong copyleftish license which does kinda that is the https://spdx.org/licenses/Parity-7.0.0.html license. If you got the trademark route apache license might be interesting.