itch.io

Hi,

I've been looking at PB-AIM and the thing that stands out is how you've built consequence into the actual memory of the world — your GM doesn't just track stats, it carries forward choices that matter. That's the opposite of most AI tools that reset or forget.

I'm building SagaForge to let designers put their own ruleset in front of players immediately. No waiting for a platform to "support" your mechanics — you paste your rules, name your character, and the game runs. We're working with 10 designers right now to run full public replays of their games.

Your LOST EARTH system seems built for exactly this. Real negotiation and consequence, no prep overhead, designed to be played not read. I'd love to integrate PB-AIM into SagaForge so people can actually see your game in motion — with your name in credits, full public replay for anyone to read.

Are you interested in that kind of visibility for what you've built?

sagaforge1@gmail.com

Hi touzirensheng,

I've been looking at Quest Forge and what struck me is how the 5-act scaffolding actually *constrains* the branching instead of exploding it. Most quest generators drown in permutations. You're forcing narrative shape while still letting players break things. That's harder than it looks.

I'm building SagaForge — a platform that plays the TTRPG rules you design. People paste in their system, name a character, and we run actual sessions. We're looking for 10 designers to integrate their work directly. Full public replays on our platform, your name in credits, free integration forever.

Quest Forge feels like it'd actually benefit from this. Right now your outputs live in isolation. What if someone could load a Quest Forge adventure *into* SagaForge, run it with a live character sheet, and the whole thing was readable afterward as a real story?

Want to talk about whether that's interesting?

— Ian

sagaforge1@gmail.com

I've been looking at how you structured the save file persistence across sessions—that's the hard part most solo tools skip. Forcing the GM to actually maintain state instead of just generating random encounters is clever.

I'm building SagaForge: a platform that plays TTRPGs directly from their rules. You paste in your system, name a character, and start playing. The engine tracks everything—character sheet, world events, inventory—without you having to wrangle markdown prompts or manage chat sessions manually.

I think Cairn would be a strong fit. We're offering free integration for 10 designers, plus we'd run a full public replay of your game that anyone can read and follow along with. Your name stays in the credits.

The core question: would you want your game running on a platform where people can actually just *play* it without setup, instead of copying your prompt into ChatGPT?

Hey Ren,

I just read through The Lost Rabbit and the countdown structure caught me—that ticking pressure of the building demolition forcing hard choices about what Ellie's players investigate first. It's the kind of constraint that makes a 3-hour session hit different.

I run SagaForge, a platform where people can actually play the games designers create. We paste your rules into the system, players name characters and start playing right away. No prep needed on their end.

I think Lost Rabbit would work really well here. The countdown clock translates cleanly, the ghost story hits harder when someone's actually playing Ellie instead of reading about her, and the system-neutral design means we can run it exactly as you wrote it.

We're offering ten designers free integration into the platform, their name in credits, and we do a full public replay that anyone can read and learn from. No fees, no strings.

Does this sound like something worth exploring?

— Ian