I don't understand the whole hate for algorithms. Sure, they are bad, but opposed to what? So many writers and painters died before their works were ever recognized as grandiose. Obscurity isn't a just-nowadays problem. My favorite ever VN was recommended to me via word-of-mouth, by a friend, but how did they come across it? No doubt the algo played a part.
"Curation creates conversations, and those conversations are the most important part. And without this exercise, we are left alone with our own thoughts as if we are living in a post-apoc world." Ouch. I am someone who... Doesn't really talk about what they've read? Come on, it's so hard to find someone who read the same work as you. Most conversations I have with book readers are the both of us mentioning books that are on each others' reading lists but not yet read. I had this happen to me with an anime fan of all things. We knew each other's animes just enough to acknowledge each other, but not to discuss.
"Yeah, I'd have a frosslass in my pokemon team" "oh you mean the yuki onna pokemon? She's cool. literally." "of course you would call it the yukki onna pokemon".
I really like this manifesto (though unsure if I comprehended it), the repetition of the title makes for a stronger message, though since it can be defragmented into so many lenses, I think such a reductive message doesn't portray the full meaning (but perhaps this is due to being non-native in english. Doesn't help that all references to internet phenomena flew completely over my head.)
"Hidden gems" have always been something I loved to find "by myself" and I think in part, the fascination comes from them being "hidden", from being something I found on my own and that is very, very niche. I don't understand these micro communities the author speaks of

