Hey everyone,
I was looking at the voting categories and noticed a potential issue. With the "self-explanatory" theme and the zero-text rule, the current criteria heavily reward games that are just easy to figure out right away. I know that's the whole point of the theme, but it feels like the current setup values the "self-explanatory" aspect too much, leaving no room to judge innovation or creativity.
The thing is, if someone submits a Tetris clone, they'll easily get top scores. It’s familiar and totally intuitive, but it brings nothing new to the table. Since there isn't a category that lets voters express other qualities of a game, the system just lacks granularity.
It would be nice to have something like "Overall" or "Creativity".
This would give voters a way to reward a game's ambition and out-of-the-box design, even if it ends up being a bit less "self-explanatory" than a standard arcade clone.
What do you guys think?











