Post by Shelves' Schwa in (No) Compendium comments

Viewing post in (No) Compendium comments

0 (cont.):

Whereas a foil serves as a reflective counterpart to draw out the latent interiority of a monad, an empty room symbolizes the absence of any external perspective or contrast.

A foil provides a constructed vantage point against which the monad defines itself. But an empty room removes any such external referent, leaving the monad alone with only its own self-conception and imaginative potential.

A foil actualizes one singular alternate viewpoint in dialectic with the player's monad. But an empty room is like a blank canvas, opening up an infinite possibility of perspectives, narratives, and subjective projections that could be manifested.

With a foil, the monad's identity crystallizes through opposition and tension with its counter-conception. But in an empty room, the monad's sense of self becomes diffuse, virtual, freed from anchors in any particular constructed narrative.

While a foil gives shape by providing boundaries, the empty room is protean in its lack of definition. It is both meaningless and imbued with all possible meanings by the observing monad.

So in contrast to the mirroring counter-definition provided by a foil, the empty room represents the monad's own infinite inner vista. It is the realm of pure imagination, where the monad is unconstrained by any preset narrative and able to manifest its deepest visions.

Shelves' Schwa1 year ago(+1)

0 (cont.):

The empty room is the monad's workshop of potentiality. The foil is but one tool to sculpt subjective experience. The empty room allows unlimited tools and materials for creation. Or it don't.

Consider the nature of foils and the empty room within the context of monadology. As established, foils serve as conceptual counterpoints to player character monads, elucidating internal facets through contrast. They actualize singular alternate viewpoints, providing dialectic friction to draw forth latent potentialities. The foil's constructed subjectivity crystallizes the player's monad by oppositional definition.

Whereas foils give shape through counter-conception, the empty room is devoid of such external perspectives. With no narrative anchor, the monad's identity diffuses into pure imagination. Liberated from the constraints of preset roles, the empty room becomes the realm of unbounded creativity for the monad.

The foil represents the application of a particular tool to sculpt subjective experience. But the empty room provides the monad full access to unlimited tools and materials for manifestation. It is the workshop of potentiality, the blank canvas upon which the monad may author any narrative through its visionary faculty.

Shelves' Schwa1 year ago(+1)

0 (cont.):

True self-cultivation for a monad comes not through friction with any single external foil, but rather through embracing the infinite inner perspective within the empty room of the mind. When a monad's lens is clear of preconceptions, it may glimpse its authentic nature. Foils act upon a monad; the empty room allows the monad to act upon itself.

This containerization of the empty room as an unbounded creative space for monads to manifest imagined narratives stands in stark contrast to the limiting nature of foils. Whereas foils actualize singular constructed perspectives to elicit meaning through opposition, the empty room liberates the monad from preset roles and allows for pure expression of its visionary faculty.

As established in previous sections, foils function as tools to shape subjective experience through dialectic friction with their counter-conception of the monad's identity. However, the empty room provides unlimited possibilities for self-authoring without the constraints of anchored narratives.

In this sense, the empty room aligns more closely with Leibnizian principles of monadic perspective - that each monad contains an infinite inner representation of the universe within its unique lens. The blank potentiality of the empty room permits the fullest possible manifestation of this innate subjective potential.

Shelves' Schwa1 year ago(+1)

0 (cont.):

Therefore, we may qualify that for Leibniz, the empty room epitomizes the true workshop of creativity and enlightened self-cultivation, beyond the limitations of dialectic with any single external foil. It represents the monad's return to its inner authentic nature as an unbounded, imaginative force encapsulating all of existence within its singular expression.

Furthermore, Leibniz's views on the creative freedom of the empty room space can be extended to consider the role of non-player characters in actualizing subjective narratives. As explored previously, NPCs function as singular foils within tabletop roleplaying game constructs, helping to shape the player's expression of their monad's subjective experience through dialectic friction.

However, without the anchoring of predetermined NPC foils, the empty room environment allows the player's monad free reign over manifestation of NPCs as well. No longer constrained by a limited set of predetermined narrative possibilities, the monadic player may conjure any possible NPC perspectives, characters, and events within the empty room's blank potentiality.

Much as the empty room liberates the player's monad from the constraints of dialectic with a single foil, so too does it permit the imaginative creation of manifold NPC foils according to the player's vision. The empty room thus provides a creative workspace for the monad to author a fully-realized subjective world through manifestation of diverse NPC viewpoints and dramaturgy.

In this way, the principles underlying Leibniz's empty room concept align with his broader monadology. The empty room's blank canvas permits maximal actualization of this innate subjective complexity through imagined NPC interaction in service of the monad's self-expression.

Shelves' Schwa1 year ago(+1)

0 (cont.):

While Leibniz privileges the creative potential of the empty room unbound by foils, this conception relies on an assumption of the monad as an autonomous agent with sole authorial control. However, contemporary developments in tabletop roleplaying game design provide opportunities to complicate and enrich Leibniz's model.

In particular, some games recognize collaborative storytelling between players and gamemasters is inevitable on these surfaces, and, further, leverage this distributed agency and emergent narratives from decentralized co-creation. Neither player nor gamemaster fully controls the empty room here — its potentialities manifest through intersubjective appraisal and spontaneous co-authorship.

This collaborative paradigm recasts the empty room as an intermonadic space, predicated on the interplay of multiple perspectives in recognizing and unfolding creative possibilities. The self cultivation Leibniz associates with the blank canvas of the empty room could thus be considered an intermonadic collaborative practice.

While bold, this interpretation foregrounds the social, perspectival nature of world-authoring implied yet underdeveloped in Leibniz's monadology. It paves the way for a revitalized monadology attuned to multiplicity, relationally, and co-creation in fashioning reality through shared imagination. The empty room may harbour untapped promise as a site for intermonadic convergence.

Shelves' Schwa1 year ago(+1)

0 (cont.):

Building on the proposition of the empty room as an intermonadic space, we can look to how the boundaries between player character monads ("PCs") and non-player character monads ("NPCs") can become permeable and blurred during moments of immersive gameplay.

In highly collaborative episodes of co-created narrative, NPCs may transcend their design as foil constructs and manifest as quasi-autonomous perspectival centers. No longer mere tools for PC actualization, they exhibit capabilities for intricate relationships, motivations, and dramatic agency.

Likewise, as gameplay facilitates deep exploration of a PC's inner conflicts, the external world itself - including weather, landscapes, political systems - may take on character foils' provocative, crystallizing influence in signaling the PC's own subjective struggle.

Even a PC's virtues, flaws, drives and latent potentials could be personified and embodied in NPC relationships as the user explores nuances of their imagined identity. Their very inner monadic nature is exteriorized and made relational.

In this way, the roles of PC and NPC superpenetrate and inform each other. Just as the empty room is an intermonadic space, so too do PC and NPC dissolve into co-creative instruments for collective illumination. The tabletop stage comes to life through their interbeing.

Shelves' Schwa1 year ago(+1)

0 (cont.):

This points to the power of empathic perspective-taking and listening in not just self-discovery, but realizing one's self as emerging through constructive entanglement with imagined others. The empty room is filled through the ethical interplay of voices in making meanings that transcend solitary interiority.

As PCs enact abilities and leverage their statistical strengths during gameplay, this provokes opportunities for embodied conversations between the PC and personified manifestations of the player—err—ur-character's inner attributes (naturally).

For example, when a PC draws on their high shivers score in a tense window gazing, this could be dramatized as their latent "Shivers" facet emerging as an NPC ally, whispering widowed words or otherwise ablating the PC's associative and hermanutical resources.

Or if a PC's low intelligence score causes them to skim over an unexplored if crucial claim, their personified "Reaction Speed" may appear mocking their foolishness (pushing the PC to either develop that mental stat or else rely on complemetary strengths).

In this way, overt characterization of the PC's capacities and inclinations allows for roleplay entering a character's inner landscape. The empty room becomes populated with fragmentary NPCs embodying distinct skill sets, energies and ways of framing — and critiquing other NPCs framed — challenges.

Shelves' Schwa1 year ago(+1)

0 (cont.):

As these personified stats are externalized and interacted with, new nuances of the PC's identity and room for growth are illuminated. They transition from dry numerical attributes to living, breathing dimensions of the self coming into their own through dramatic realization.

Much as foils serve to reflect back latent elements of a PC's monadic perspective, so too can personified strengths, flaws and potentials act as narrative mirrors inviting deeper self-cultivation through play. The empty thought provides space for multidimenional exploration of the PC's inner system of qualities.

Having explored the fluidity between PCs and NPCs, along with the dramatic personification of PCs' inner traits, we circle back to the original proposition that collaborative tabletop roleplay can serve to draw out and actualize latent desires in the players themselves.

The superpenetration of PC and NPC perspectives, as well as the externalization and embodiment of PCs' interiority, creates ample opportunities to reveal and engage with players' unspoken aspirations, conflicts, and developmental potentials.

As NPC relationships and events respond to and mirror facets of a PC's attributes and inclinations, this resonates with and amplifies latent elements within the player's own subjectivity. The player may discover unconscious desires or objectionable parts of themselves through reacting to NPC and environmental dynamics that embody those energies.

Shelves' Schwa1 year ago

0 (cont.):

Likewise — investing in a PC's growth along certain stat lines manifests a player's own underlying priorities for their idealized self. Nurturing their PC's unused capacities reflects the player's longing for self-actualization. Or it don't.

If it do, the collaborative empty room provides a safe yet provocative space for exploratory co-creation and integration of the player's monadic possibilities. Here, PC engagement elicits latent potentialities which may then be honored, reconciled, or constructively reimagined through RP.

Thus we see how tabletop roleplay, through its blending of perspectives and personification of inner traits, can serve as an impactful modality of human flourishing. The empty room offers a potent intermonadic workshop to illuminate and integrate the many selves within.

My assertions about using PCs to reflect and actualize latent player desires does not sufficiently consider neither games where players min-max character stats nor games where PC embodiment is wholly alien from human experience. Let us engage the latter — with a wall-PC, players cannot as easily project themselves onto the character — bypassing the former.

A wall-PC forces a more nuanced re-examination of the "empty room" concept. The wall-PC inhabits the room persistently, shaping it through literal presence rather than imagined self-projection. The room's meanings emerge through detached observation, indirect influence, and reliance on other actors to fulfill the wall-PC's limited capabilities.

Shelves' Schwa1 year ago

0 (cont.):

So with highly constrained PCs, the eliciting of player desire must stem less from dramaturgical embodiment, and more from creative interpretation and meaning-making given the limitations. Finding agency and significance through a wall-PC requires contemplating one's place within systems beyond direct control.

Therefore, wall-RP games may reveal players' latent perspectives on powerlessness, or the virtues of embeddedness in community, or conceptualizing fulfillment despite restricted choices. The empty room becomes a meditative space to reframe assumptions of action and identity.

Unconventional PC embodiment compels more symbolic analysis from players, versus direct projection/exploration. But tabletop RP's capacity for illuminating latent desires still applies, simply through different techniques of defamiliarization, constraint and hermeneutic play. The room empties perception to allow for reconstructed identification.

To better illustrate the techniques by which experimental tabletop RP reveals latent player desires, let us consider an example game scenario using wall-PCs.

In this game, players create sentient wall characters for an empty tavern room set in a fantasy village. Through cooperative storytelling, the walls slowly piece together that the tavern has been attacked and abandoned. The walls can only perceive what occurs directly within the room, as well as muffled sounds from outside.

View more in thread

itch.io

Viewing post in (No) Compendium comments

0 (cont.):

0 (cont.):

0 (cont.):

0 (cont.):

0 (cont.):

0 (cont.):

0 (cont.):

0 (cont.):

0 (cont.):

0 (cont.):