Skip to main content

On Sale: GamesAssetsToolsTabletopComics
Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
TagsGame Engines
(+1)(-3)

It's still kinda gross... Not to be rude or anything it just seems wrong to make porn of anyone under 18...

(+3)(-1)

As long as nobody gets hurt, why does anyone care?

(2 edits) (+3)(-1)

ignore them they are just hateful normies and tbh as long as you say the age is 18 or above there's nothing anyone can do to stop you from making them look as young as possible also you can tell she's clearly 18 or 19 so idk what the big deal is idk the MC's age but I'm sure it's about the same oh tbh if she's a ghost she might be older than she remembers herself being but since a ghost remembers how old they were and what they looked like when they died they tend to stay at that age

Some entities care. Especially in the English speaking countries. They do outlaw even cartoon stuff. It is of course laughable, but they also have their obscenity laws that are equally idiotic. There are states in the US where sex toys are illegal. No factual discussion is possible with people that promote such bigotism.

I believe they try to invoke some slippery slope fallacies about morals and and whatnot. Ulimately saying that playing games where you can kill people will make you kill people in real life. Oh wait, that one was disproven countless times. I meant they want to ban sex games, so peopl will not rape and abuse. Hmm. Yeah, that argument will work, since it worked for the violence so well.

Anyways, the problem is entities like patreon, that have their own agenda and push it with their market weight around. They are unpredictable and hypocritical. They want their share of the adult cake, but instead of banning only the actual illegal stuff, like actual abuse, they give you trouble if you do not go out of your way to make clear that the fictional pixels are of legal age. And unrelated by blood.

(+1)

You are right, but in your statement lies the answer to this problem. "of anyone". Those are artificially created images of non existing people. So they are doubly not of anyone.

If it were a cartoon representation of an existing kid. Or a realistic looking image that could look like an actual kid, now that would be disturbing.