Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
Tags
(+1)

This is spot-on for the theme--I think this sort of thing is exactly what Willem was angling for. Tower defense has always occupied a funny space of almost-but-not-quite taking off, and you make a nice compelling case about how you could expand it into a deeper experience that would encourage repeat play. I like that the player is both attacker and defender simultaneously and that you have to choose and customize both types of units. Between team play, AI bosses, quests, seasonal events, and everything, you're really describing a rich and rewarding experience here. I would play it for sure.

My main comment is just on the GDD itself; I think you hewed too closely to the template and could have just cut big sections that aren't relevant to your game, like the entire Plot section. I could also have done without the Midjourney pictures, especially since they don't fit your written description very well. But hey, if the worst criticism I have is your document formatting, you're doing well.

(+1)

Hi Gwen!

Thanks for this feedback. I think you're right and my attempt to follow the template overburdened the document.

I did a few quick runs in Midjourney and couldn't get a good top down, but wanted something that gave the idea of lots of random types of "characters" for the attackers and defenders, so I tossed them in at the end. However, I can see how they might have just been confusing at that point.  Also, it's not like I don't own quite a few tower defense games that I could have screenshot ...

My hope is that you're right and the basic TD element doesn't get stale because there is enough other things happening in that meta-play outside the main game (quests, collections, events, etc).

Thanks again!