Skip to main content

On Sale: GamesAssetsToolsTabletopComics
Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
TagsGame Engines
(+2)

Thank you so much for this incredibly detailed feedback!

I’ll try to explain why we went with this approach and what we think is missing in terms of gameplay:

Why not just make the wheel’s rotation random?

When I was testing it, I was extremely frustrated by the lack of agency. No matter what I bought, I couldn’t protect myself based on my HP, nor could I try to end the battle in a way that benefited me.

So we figured we needed to add a way to choose what to shoot at while also adding some “difficulty” to aiming (due to the speed). We also wanted it to vary depending on the enemies, but we couldn’t implement that due to time constraints.

And then we wanted to link the gameplay of this bar to tiles we’d obtain, for example : applying a poison effect to the enemy, but the poison damage only activates if you hit a specific area of the bar. And the more poison the enemy has, the larger the zone becomes. That way, you either try to aim for something specific, or you set up the wheel for the next turn to get multiple beneficial effects at the same time, because for this turn, it’s not possible to get exactly what you want.

We also would have liked to have more variety in enemy gameplay, more biomes, and longer levels, but unfortunately we didn’t have enough time to implement everything we wanted.

Sorry if my answer isn't thorough enough or misses the point, English isn't my first language, haha

Thanks for answering! 😄

I understand wanting agency, it's just on the longer scale that has some game design implications that come out of it. (As I mentioned in the original comment)

"And then we wanted to link the gameplay of this bar to tiles we’d obtain" "or you set up the wheel for the next turn"
Yeah these and that poison example was exactly what my shallow imagination couldn't come up with! 
There you have a choice of what you're going for and it's related to the mechanic. That's perfect!

Still (personally) I'd prefer it's either full random or you get to pick the exact one without any hassles. (Or if it's mechanical then it should be like reaaally easy to control so it's essentially just a choice but you get the toy like fun still). 

The depth is in the choice (stack poison or hit specific other tile)
Not in the mechanical skill (how precise timing you press the button to get what you want. )

Of course some games can be about physical mechanics like aiming, movement etc.
But those games have a lot of fun and depth in the mechanic itself.
In roguelike deckbuilder type games I personally feel that mechanical execution just takes away from the depth.
These games shine with the interesting non obvious decisions the player has to make. (Like the poison example you explained.)
There's some exceptions I'm sure but I'd bet that their mechanical skill is more in depth than one button timing.

And again this is just "If I designed this game what would I change" and not "This is objectively how this game should be how dare you". 



(1 edit)

It's actually really cool that you're sharing your perspective on what you'd change if you'd designed the game :D

I get what you mean about mechanical skill versus the depth of the game through deckbuilding.

Since, for me, you figure out pretty quickly what you’re going to choose, it’s rare to really mess up, and I didn’t find that messing up was too punishing. I think I’d rather keep this element than go for pure randomness, haha.

Thanks again for your feedback, it’s really interesting.

(1 edit) (+1)

I replayed it once again and beat a run. (I didn't before)

For all these thoughts and suggestions I made the game would of course need completely different game balance and effects.
If you did make it random it would need a complete rebalance haha. I was more suggesting maybe having full control but I can understand keeping it like this.
"it’s rare to really mess up"
I think that's what I meant with the "barrier of entry". You've passed it so it's trivial but new players haven't so they're playing on random with the game balance for "choose perfectly"
But honestly the barrier isn't as high as I initially thought. Falls a little closer to the "It's easy enough that it's a choice"
I'd still take a look at completely new players trying it of course. I initially gave up quite early so there's something that could be improved in the new player experience I'm sure.

Thanks for the discussion and good luck with your game!