Skip to main content

Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
TagsGame Engines
(+4)

To be clear, things like the OFL’s “Reserved Font Name” or the GPL’s “must distribute source code” clause don’t actually do anything to prevent abuse like this. They just give you (in this case, IJ) the legal right to sue people who do break those rules, which means preventing abuse depends on IJ having the time and money to hire lawyers to do the suing, and investigators to figure out who needs to be sued, and possibly more lawyers to figure out which of those people live in countries where international treaties allow them to be sued from whatever country IJ lives in.

Without all that additional stuff, those clauses just amount to saying “don’t be a jerk” in fancier language, which.. I think was already implied.

(+1)(-2)

Suing is very rare. Before that people send a email to the site owner simply stating that they are not complying with the license. Then they usually already feel the heat. Like if they had to change the domain name to something else then wigglypaint, then they cannot ride on the visibility wigglypaint already has .  They would start with zero-visibility, which for low-effort clones, means many of them will get way less traction. For this approach it helps to have it explicitly stated in the license to quote it.