[OUTDATED - SEE REPLIES]
Okay I have to agree with @Gee_k, this game is very, very suspisious.
1. Along with the weird comment language(all worded like it was meant for someone else, rather than the programmer themselves), the method used to handle sound is odd. The game uses procedual generated sound using programmed sounds, which dosen't inherently mean it's AI, but would be very time consuming for a person to do(I would reccomend looking at the code for this if you don't get why I think it is odd).
2. The game was submitted 15 days before the deadline. Again, this dosn't inherently mean it's AI, but with the game complexity and tedium(as mentioned above) it seems unrealistic.
3. As Gee_K stated, the creator wouldn't need to delete comments and quickly change the game if the game was created in good faith. If you made a game entirely without AI and someone accused you of AI, likely your first response wouldn't be hiding the comments and evidence.
4. The creator posted anouther game for a different jam TODAY. This new game uses ai(the images in the game are very clearly ai), and like this game this new game was marked as "No AI used". The jam this game submitted to also had a reward, and the game was submitted 17 days before the end of this jam. The coding style was almost identical in this game and had many of the same signs that this one had.
Obviously, one of these factors wouldn't have any need for concern, but all of them makes it pretty clear what took place. At the very least I hope the jam moderators look into this because it seems highly likely to be almost entirely AI.
Quick Edit - I know Jam particpants should be suportive, but AI games in a non-ai jam with people who work really hard to make games should not be acceptable. Obviously no one should attack or harass the creator of any game, and any suspisions should aim to be respectful.
