Skip to main content

Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
TagsGame Engines
(+1)

From the description I gather that the game is largely vibe coded, so I am gonna focus my feedback on the larger design decision and how coherent everything came together.

I think the idea of an automatic space invaders game mixed with card mechanics, even if not entirely original is a good one. I also like the general art direction and chosen color palette, to me the UI came together quite coherently and looks good in general. Standout for me are the graphics of the enemy ships - they are somewhat reminiscent of games like warning forever, which I am a fan of.

I found the music generally annoying and thought that it didn't really match the gameplay or aesthetic. Something low bit or even just instrumental pieces would've matched better.

Generally bringing in an overarching narrative is a good thing and would work well - however I felt like the actual dialogue was largely pointless drivel and felt like I was actively wasting my time reading it. I assume it was also AI writing, as it was a lot of text with very little substance or meaning I could make out.

The biggest draw back and thing that needs improvement the most is the gameplay though. Especially the card-game aspect. There were little to no actual decisions I was making when playing the game, just taking any card that spawned and dropping it on my ship seemed like a valid strategy, resulting in me just watching a simulation with minimal input.

I don't want to take away from the effort, that was clearly put into this - but I would say, if you cut out larger parts of the usual game development work you need to put more effort into making the parts that are made by you stand out more. 

hey, thank you for the detailed feedback!

glad the core idea, art direction, palette and ship graphics worked for you. i also like this direction of mixing an automatic space invaders-ish and card mechanics

about the music, i understand what you mean. for me it was mostly about supporting the mood and the strange lonely feeling i wanted the game to have. i tried to balance the melancholy of the story with the more active gameplay parts

about the narrative, i had a clear direction in mind: loneliness, distance, self decay, but i agree that the actual text side should be more focused and developed more specifically. right now it works more as an overall mood around the game

about the card gameplay, the intended idea is that threats should push you to adapt, hold cards, merge at the right time, discard bad options and plan around danger spikes. at the same time, i wanted the system to stay pretty fast and flow-based, not become an overly complex card game. so the target was low entry barrier, quick decisions, and a bit of depth through timing and card management

i think your point is useful here: if it feels like you can just take any card and drop it on the "ship", then the game should communicate its threat goals more clearly. the player needs to understand what danger is coming, why it matters, and why holding or merging a card could be better than spending everything immediately

thanks again, this is useful feedback!

(+1)

Awesome! Looking at it this way, it's really more of an UX issue to teach the player the intended way to play. I didn't get the card merging at all.

I think another thing that I would've appreciated would be seeing the deck. Especially if I'm meant to strategize about using cards, it would be good to know what will generally be available.

An idea could also be to introduce a casting cost to cards. If you needed to kill a couple of enemies before being able to afford a card to play it would emphasize the strategic aspect.

yeah, exactly, i think a lot of it is a UI and UX question

my goal was to keep the game pretty minimal, without too many texts, tooltips or explanations, and make the mechanics understandable through play. from the feedback i got, i think this mostly worked, but the merge system is probably the part that needs clearer communication

the tutorial text at the top was added very late, almost as an emergency layer, so i see it more as extra support than as the ideal way to teach the game

about card merging, i tested a few different versions during development. in the final jam version it ended up more as an optional deeper layer than as the main way to play

right now it is more like a small gimmick and system exploration mechanic: if you dig into it, you can find some extra fun there through combinations and a bit of card tier progression, but the core gameplay is not fully built around merge strategy in this slice

about seeing the deck, good point. for this prototype i did not really see it as a deckbuilder, more like a fast random card flow where you get strange tools during combat and quickly decide what to do with them. but if the game moved more toward strategic planning, showing available cards would make much more sense

casting cost is also an interesting idea, but i think it would be a big design change. it could add strategy, but it could also slow down the flow and make the game feel less immediate. so i would need to look at it in a wider game context, instead of just adding it on top of the current version

thanks again, these are good thoughts