What I said was, "I developed both games, so it's natural to maintain the same visual language. The similarity in style doesn't say anything about the tool used." And I'm not lying, I developed both games, and yes, it's natural that they have similarities, even if I used AI. You're just writing to prove your point (which is correct). Why this aggression? Isn't the purpose of a game jam to make games? To have fun?
Do you have any opinion on the gameplay itself? It seems that for you, pointing out that it's AI is more important than knowing if the game is fun or not. What is the purpose of making a game for you? Do you make games for yourself or for others to have fun?
Finally, yes, I used AI. Even though you didn't say so, it's possible to tell there's AI involved in the process. To be honest, I hadn't realized I couldn't use AI, and I submitted a project I made using AI, which was done during the same period. But I didn't think I'd receive comments completely ignoring my game and focusing on the fact that it was made with AI, like the game is cool and fun, but it seems that's invalidated when the focus of the comments is the AI. A game is made to be fun, and my game fulfills that purpose. I'm sorry you didn't have fun.