Skip to main content

Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
TagsGame Engines
(1 edit)

One expects it to be that way, because that’s what the official descriptions imply.

Staff having to manually approve listings from devlogs is unexpected. It’s also discouraging when we look at what gets through to the list and what doesn’t.

That’s becayse despite what Leafo (site owner) insists, Popular and Most Recent lists matter. They are promotional.

I don’t know why— with everything else happening, it shouldn’t be— but it’s hard to believe the organizational priorities here are that bad.

Anyhow, what No Time to Play (Community moderator) has been suggesting all along is we need to focus entirely on offsite promotions. The indexing system is not for most of us as creators, collectors, players, or readers. We have to rely on each other to share links.

There's an official description? Where?

The recent is called newest, actually. The title is latest. And the link to it is recent. But unlike some tags, I did not yet encounter a description, what it is supposed to be. Or what exactly is new/recent/latest. The publishing date, the updating date, the release date, whatever. That a devlog can screw sorting is indeed quirky.

Appearing in recent is only big, if you have zero marketing. It is 5 minute fame. That's my opinion too, and I think I read that stance several times by leafo. But I do not recall popular sort beging regarded the same. They see the whole indexing discoverability as a bonus, which has consequences, like how they take sometimes weeks to index a thing. But of course being on top of popular is important. One needs only look at all the video comments from youtubers crosspromoting the games and themselves.