horribly misused that italics
The italics were quoting what the original posted said in their title, which, in my opinion, is an incorrect statement. I’ve updated the post to use the full quote. (possibly the semantics of anything vs everything are confusing here, I take the original poster’s intent to mean everything)
I think the discussion of the intersection of adult content and queer content is valuable and should be had. We are not the creators of this legislation, and unfortunately we have to comply with it even if we disagree with it. My post was plainly stating that we do not consider the use of queer tags as criteria for the automated restriction.
I did a quick query so you can get an idea of how impactful the restriction is. We have approximately 20,000 public projects containing tags queer or lgbt. Approximately 5,700 of those will be put into geo-restriction based on the developer-provided tags. That’s definitely a substantial amount, but there’s still a large volume of queer content that will not be affected.
In our post here we talk about the criteria used, how developers can check their page’s status, and how they can appeal if they think a restriction has been unfairly applied to their page: https://itch.io/t/5133739/our-update-on-the-uk-online-safety-act
Thanks