Skip to main content

Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
TagsGame Engines

I missed out on v1 in the fall I assume, so I can't comment on how much it's improved. I quite enjoyed thinking about shortest paths in relation to the river and mirror (free) cells. 

In my humble opinion, the game would be twice as fun if the check steps was fixed to be on, and there was a fixed goal to try to reach. Still, fun though!

My biggest gripe was the current position cell color was hard to see on my monitor. I also couldn't figure out if I was making the "right" moves when hiding the map, as the current position cell did not update (too much for me to remember personally). 

I wish we had a 4th category, technical merit, as the map generator here is quite good! You definitely put a lot of thought and work into it, and it shows!

Looking forward to v3 (or another game) in the future!

(+1)

Thanks for your feedback!

v1 was introduced here on spring Lisp game jam, but 7 years ago )

And for your impression about gameplay, it looks like you do not get if in a full way, i added a short 15 min youtube trailer to clarify it and show actual process as it should be. Hope you'll have much more fun with it )


Yeah I often do not grasp intuition as well as others. I'll watch the video and give the labyrinth another go! Thank you for taking the time to provide a longer tutorial :)

Thanks for the video, it clarified exactly what check-steps was doing, and why I didn't get position info when the map was hidden. I realize that would've spoiled half the fun of guessing the shapes I'm traversing. I was able to use your approach for a 3x3 hidden map, and it was quite entertaining. Made me feel like I was my own Conflict Driven Clause Learning algorithm!

If you do make a v3, something between totally hidden and totally shown map deductions would be nice for folks less technically inclined. Maybe some sort of minesweeper-esque system of uncovering squares and placing potential flags for cell types?

Either way, very cool! 

(+1)

Thank you for getting into this game and for your advice! Maybe I'll implement something like this next time!