Thank you for taking the time to write this—these are valid criticisms.

You are absolutely right that most players come to game sites with a specific purpose:

they are looking for a specific genre, tag, or experience, and traditional stores are designed for that.

Random Missions wasn't designed to change that behavior.

What I'm exploring is a very different moment:

the "I don't know what to play" or "surprise me" situation.

Not as the primary way people play games, but as an optional layer of discovery.

About the video—I agree.

It's not a game preview, nor is it intended to be.

It was just a quick mood test, and clearly it doesn't convey the idea well.

The next step is not videos, but a small playable demo.

Regarding "how are these games made?":

The idea is not for Random Missions to make full games,

but to host extremely small, independent playable missions created as experiments —

similar to game marathons or micro-prototypes.

And saying "let's do this together" doesn't mean handing over the concept.

It means opening the format for discussion, feedback, and eventually submissions if the idea is found interesting

That’s a fair question, and I think part of the confusion is on my side, so let me clarify.

Right now, Random Missions is not asking for financial support in the traditional sense,

and it’s not positioned as “other people make games for us”.

At this stage, I’m building and testing the format myself:

very small, experimental micro-missions and a simple system around them.

No one is being asked to contribute content or labor.

When I mention “support”, I mean two things:

– moral support as in feedback, criticism, and reality checks

– and eventually, if the experiment shows promise, guidance on where this could go next

There is no business model, funding ask, or expectation of developers contributing work.

If this ever moves forward, it would only make sense if developers opt in

because the format provides value to them — not the other way around.

So for now, “who are we?” is simply:

me, experimenting with a different way to prototype and experience game discovery,

and asking whether this idea is even worth pursuing.