Well, if you figure out a way to do it without me giving you the source code, hosting the generator at your place or anything like that, then yes, why not :) But usually people resolve to pregenerating a large enough number of maps without invoking the generator afterwards (like here: https://hexroll.app/).
watabou
Creator of
Recent community posts
- There is currently no way to request a building strictly without a basement. But it doesn't always spawn a basement, for a single-storey building the probability is 50%.
- My algorithm tends to produce very unrealistic plans for buildings larger than "large", and I wouldn't like to expose it by offering the "huge" option. However, using the blueprint editor, you can request a significantly larger building than those built with the "large" tag.
If you're looking specifically for building maps (rather than dungeon or cave map) then this generator is preferable as plans produced by Procgen Mansion are pretty useless imo. Dwellings will replace Procgen Mansion on the Arcana soon.
You can try to examine the published js code as @BorisTheBrave did with the cave generator: https://www.boristhebrave.com/2023/11/19/how-does-cave-glade-generator-work/
It is not possible to ask the generator to place the coast on a specific side of the map centre, but you can rotate the map any way you need using the Rotate tool in Warp mode. You can also rotate the compass rose independently.
Currently, there is no way to get more than one fortress and one cathedral on a map, but something like that will become possible in the future.
This is a limitation of the way these two generators reference each other. When Azgaar's generator calls the city generator, it only passes on information about the original map (its seed), but not about the changes made to it. Because of that, the city generator can only restore the original overworld map. This works the same way in the opposite direction when start with a city, switch to the overworld and then try to return to the city.
- The current version of the generator works pretty differently from the one on github and changing the nature of individual parts of a district would be a bit harder. For example, after a district is generated, it's quite difficult to spawn a new plaza or a castle in it. Not impossible of course, but difficult. This is done in favor of more "continuous" street patterns
- I planned to implement something like this long time ago (sort of related: link), but first I am going to rework the whole sea/river subsystem.
- I am not sure I get your idea. Why would we need this? To show more detailed buildings in City Viewer? In any case it is not possible with the current architecture of my generators. They all are purely client-side applications, so MFCG for example can't ask PM to create a building for it.
No, an exported city can only be imported in City Viewer (to be viewed as a 3d model).
You can try to achieve something similar in the Village Generator, just hide buildings (Layers > Buildings in the context menu) if you don't need the village itself. Cheers!