Thanks so much for this review! 😁 I'm so glad you enjoyed your game! For more games in the same style, you should check out Mobile Frame Zero: Firebrands, the OG game using this system—that may scratch the itch for more stories in different settings!
Recent community posts
Good clarification. No, players don't draw new cards, they have to manage their hands and decide when to act and when to leave events to chance.
Yes, setting aside the remaining cards within reach is redundant. I'll have to update that language on page 2.
Oh, I've been itching to do a ruleset around travelling communities, so rules for generating NPCs to form a caravan, and rules for overland travel. Maybe that can be a DungeonPunk thing!
Also considering rules for creating magical or mundane familiars, companions, constructs... 🤔
Hey, this game is very cool. I'm blown away by the amount of setting detail you developed in such a short amount of time!
I'm sorry if I missed it, but I can't find in the document what your core resolution mechanic is? When there's a challenge, what do players do to determine success or failure? I understand how to calculate my bonuses based on my stats, but is it a "roll d20 + stat bonus", or something else?
You've hooked me with your premise, I think it would be worth (when you want, and have time) to flesh out some of the mechanical elements to help me, the player, tell stories that fit in your setting.
Hey Game Dunk community, I've roughed out my game submission, and I'd love some thoughts and feedback, if anyone's interested in reading it! I think it could do with another edit to make it a bit more punchy, and do more to make the descriptions exciting. I'm also curious if you think there's enough meat to make it playable. Does there need to be a challenge-check mechanic for non-magical things, do you think?
No, I don't manage or know of any communities for my games. ☺️ But I reckon there are probably some general Powered By The Apocalypse (PbtA) homebrewing Subreddits and Discord servers out there where people would be talking hacks and original content for all sorts of games built on this framework.
This game is great, and you should buy it. Preparing 4 Paris embraces the messy entanglements and relational drama of the Firebrands framework to create goofy high school adventures with real heart, and Logan innovates on the framework by blending in stats and dice rolls that give a strong cohesion to the overall story. The veneer is silliness, but the core is deep, strong relationships between characters, and the frameworks to help players pull these off in satisfying, and safe, ways. It's a joy to read, and even more fun to play.
(Disclaimer, I'm a contributor to this game as a stretch goal minigame writer. But I loved it long before I had a chance to write for it)
My question for people more experienced with BitD/FitD playbook design (everyone) is, are there elements that every (or almost every) good playbook should have in its special abilities? For example, should every playbook have a push yourself move? Should every playbook have a move that increases effect? Should every playbook have a Ghost move (like the core playbooks do)? What do you think?
Hey all, I just submitted a playbook to this jam, the Mechanist, which is my BitD-steampunk take on Iron Man. I've never done any design for BitD or FitD, so I'm really keen for any feedback or thoughts people might have. I think, in particular, I leaned heavily on PbtA style move design over the more specific BitD mechanics; there's not much in the way of moves around pushing, or effect, or the Blades-specific mechanics like Heat or stuff. What do other people think? https://mqsalmon.itch.io/mechanist
There is just a crazy amount of content and story potential contained in these seemingly simple rules. All the challenges are fun and varied, and the rules themselves are entertaining to read.
Take on the role of a mortally wounded sun on a road trip quest back to the sky through a gloomy twilit world where the real treasure is the friends we made along the way.
- The title is a pun. This is good.
- This is a game about dead or dying gods. This is great.
- Gameplay is simple, narrative heavy, and every mechanic builds towards the story's climax.
- It uses playing cards, not dice, which I have a fondness for.
The mechanics of resolving turns present the sun with a choice: prioritise overcoming trials, or prioritise gathering companions. Failing challenges costs faith, losing faith ends the game and makes a bad epilogue more likely, but gathering companions for the journey makes the sun stronger (or more versatile) in the long run, and increases the chances of a positive epilogue. Of course, it's not always up to the sun's player: the luck of the draw plays into everything, because this is a game, not freeform storytelling (which is fine, but a different thing). So the sun often has to make the best of bad situations.
All of these factors - faith, companions, the goals of the sun and their mortal needs - come together to define the end of the game, be it a glorious re-ascension, a bitter exile, or something else entirely. The epilogue then touches on the impact of the sun on the world and on their companions.
W.H. Arthur's concise and evocative rules writing is a joy to read, and the game bubbles with potential. It's one of those games that you can feel how it will be to play just by reading it.
I definitely recommend this game!