itch.io

point 2 completely misses the entire point, but is the only relevant thing you could have said, because BOTH are free

the social media wasnt *the* problem, it was the straw that broke the camel's back

point 3 is literally only relevant if you can completely separate the fact that the developers are the only ones who are interested in using the software, so the broken trust is exactly what is happening here, but you cant acknowledge that because your ego refuses to let you

literally every single instance of "a godot fork" exists because this has been happening and people are tired of it

hope always has, and always will, in this case, only apply if you are keeping your eyes closed to what is going on in front of you

the people who were attacked werent even doing anything remotely abhorrent, they were just attacked over a disagreement in opinion... dictionary definition bigotry, yet they call the victims the bigots instead

More or less, the way that these kinds of licenses work would be that you can only be punished if you are using it in a for-profit way... assuming the license doesnt already let you do that

which it does

the thing with this particular kind is that every subsequent fork REQUIRES the same terms, so godot is allowed to "steal" code from redot all the same as redot can "steal" by forking

go look at the github