itch.io

Hey all, sharing where things stand with Sin of Angels, a turn-based strategy board game about outlaw motorcycle clubs fighting for control of Los Angeles County. It runs in any browser, no install, on desktop, tablet or phone.

The map. Each location is a Site clubs claim and work.

Two to six clubs, any mix of humans and AI, play out six rounds. Each round you spend Orders to recruit Members and Recruits, move onto the map's Sites and work them for cash, guns and narcotics, trade on The Silk Road, and keep your Felonies in check with the law. You can forge a ceasefire with a rival club and break it the moment it pays to. Land on the same Site as another club and it triggers a Brawl, dice and guns, played out as a cinematic 3D fight, no cards involved, and yes, you can call for backup. Whoever's holding the most Cash after round six wins, territory is just how you earn it.

A Brawl. Dice and guns, no cards.

There's solo play against the AI, online multiplayer, local pass-and-play, and a party mode that puts the 3D board on a TV while everyone plays privately from their own phone. Original outlaw-country soundtrack, per-location ambience, the works.

Sin of Angels is free, in closed beta right now, built by CRIME Digital (creator Zach Forbes, co-creator Greg Nagel). The itch page is where you get on the beta list and follow along with where things stand: https://crimedigital.itch.io/sin-of-angels

Happy to answer questions about how it plays.

Hey everyone, first post here. Quick context: I'm building Sin of Angels, a turn-based strategy board game about outlaw motorcycle clubs fighting for turf in L.A. County. It runs in a browser, no install, two to six clubs (any mix of humans and AI), exactly six rounds a game. It's in closed beta right now while I work through calls like this one.

The map clubs fight over. Each location is a Site that can be claimed and worked.

I want to talk through a decision that took longer to settle than I expected: why the game is won with cash, not territory.

Under the hood this is an area-control game. Clubs claim Sites on a shared map and fight over them. The obvious move for a game like that is to score the map itself, most territory at the end wins. It's legible, it's visual, anyone can glance at the board and tell who's ahead. I built it that way for a while.

It broke the shape of a six-round game.

If holding territory is the win condition, the correct play once you're ahead is to grab what you can early and then spend the last round or two defending it. Giving anything up becomes a straight loss, and taking anything new is a big risk for a small reward. So rounds five and six turned into a standoff. Nobody wanted to move. That's exactly backwards for a game with only six rounds. The stretch that should feel most desperate was the stretch where the least happened.

So territory got demoted. Clubs still fight over Sites, that conflict is still the core of the game, but holding a Site isn't what you're scored on. Working it is. A Site worked generates Cash, guns and narcotics, which you spend, trade on The Silk Road, or bank. Whoever has the most Cash when round six ends wins the game. Territory turned from the goal into the tool.

Two clubs on the same Site trigger a Brawl. Dice and guns, no cards.

That one change did more to the rest of the design than I expected going in. A club sitting on three Sites and doing nothing with them isn't winning anymore, it's burning turns. A smaller club actively working the one Site it's got, trading well, and staying out of a Brawl it can't win might be quietly ahead on the number that actually decides the game. And the last round stays live, because Cash keeps moving right up until it ends. Nobody gets to just sit on a lead, and a ceasefire that made sense in round three can stop making sense the moment round six starts and someone realizes they're behind.

A Site at night. Working it is what scores, not holding it.

The one thing I kept deliberately out of scoring is The Envelope. It's a turn-order marker and a tiebreaker, not a win condition on its own, and I had to fight the urge to give it more than that. Every time I tried bolting a bonus onto it, the game's attention snapped straight back to "control the object" instead of "control the money," which was the exact trap I'd just climbed out of.

I don't think cash-over-territory is the right call for every area-control game. It fit this one because six rounds is short, and I wanted every round, including the last, to punish sitting still. Curious if anyone else here has run into this exact fork, scoring the resource instead of the space, and what it did to your endgame.

If you want to see where it landed and grab a beta seat: https://soa-game.com/beta/