itch.io

That person with vampire and their name is not human. It does not have reasoning capabilities

we have never lived in a society where rape is normalized. You are absolutely brainwashed by far left and Far Right rhetoric. The kinds of people that now ban are actually extremist groups of a religious source. That are anti-lgbt that's exactly why this happens. Why do you hate us?

they have the right but that doesn't make it okay or right or you're absolute yammering to be correct. You are absolutely Incorrect and frankly insulting to abuse victims

it absolutely is by de facto censorship. It is entirely legal content and your supposition that problematic fantasy causes problematic real life harm is not only disgusting but an offense to all those who've had to suffer.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/thehill.com/opinion/technology/4424581-is-pornography-really-warping-our-brains-or-is-it-a-moral-panic/amp/

it absolutely is de facto censorship. Your education has failed you

I don't but that is not up to me. Why would you want to have vampires? Their entire aesthetic is abuse and seduction and hypnosis of non-consent. I can make that silly argument right out of the air just as you make yours.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/thehill.com/opinion/technology/4424581-is-pornography-really-warping-our-brains-or-is-it-a-moral-panic/amp/

https://www.woodhullfoundation.org/fact-checked/porn-does-not-incite-violence/

I do not think that please you are very much a pest.

they're absolutely is not. It is very much the opposite

People like you that exist are causing harm. You have internalized alt right rhetoric

https://www.woodhullfoundation.org/fact-checked/porn-does-not-incite-violence/

your point Falls. You never had a point other than to complain and fear Monger like the extremists. There is no proof that porn inside violence especially of this violent nature.

https://www.woodhullfoundation.org/fact-checked/porn-does-not-incite-violence/

In fact it's quite the opposite. Your argument is the same as not wanting violence and video games. Dead by daylight Grand Theft Auto Call of Duty all glorify violence. By your logic this turns people into sociopaths and murderers. You need to be gone

that is a lot of words to be wrong

https://www.woodhullfoundation.org/fact-checked/porn-does-not-incite-violence/

This is not true at all. You are going on feelings instead of facts . Your reasoning is not reason it is dangerous

do you regret these words now? This is a question of a censorship this is a question of reactionary Theocratic suppression by payment processors. At the behest of extremists . That is why it was removed

thank you very much and it seems that my post is aged like wine. For all the wrong reasons.

I have an open indictment against Itch.io staff for their recent anti creative freedom and anti human rights decisions. 

this is not an exageration. just because you can't doesn't mean you should. 

The outcry against "No Mercy" has ties with radical bigoted right wing orginizations. even screenshots from a seperate game were used as "proof" of how terrible it was. 

it's right here for cripe's sake. when people call on governments to impose their morality against thigns they don't like... what is that called?

To quote from "De facto and De jure censorship, why we need to be concerned about both by Christopher J Ferguson PHD.  and author of books on the violence in video games moral panic. 
said this.


"The somewhat blithe argument that consumers can access unpublished works easily if they are so inclined is a little facile, and perhaps the easiest to dispense with. The Dr. Seuss episode puts that argument to the torch, since eBay moved quickly to stop person-to-person sales of the books on its platform (though they seem to have been restored, following criticism). Bannings that follow a moral outcry can potentially create a kind of cascade, as a succession of platforms fall like dominoes. Usually, it takes a public protest in the opposing direction to bring a halt to this (as appears to have happened in not only in the case of eBay, but also Target, which reversed a decision to ban Abigail Shrier’s book from its website). Absent such pushback, advocates of censorship would almost certainly follow their argument as far as they could, pressing for material to be removed from any available outlet."

Effectively, contributing to piracy. 

so where does the buck stop? 
censorship never stops where it's supposed to. 
who's good enough to decide?

Sure, some people may think that Zerat Games should be divorced of their ability to create. that's what patreon has done. that's what happened as pressured by some very crazy zealots. the argument of "just becasue they can doesn't mean they should"

Can very easily be applied to ITCH.io  .

who can be trusted with such a power? what happens when that person in charge is someone else? 

Why be in favor and curry favor to the people that would like you and your store front to not have ANYTHING sex related? even then. what sense does it make to do this move?

you can't make it make sense. you can try. but it won't work. 

how are we continually ignoring the blue whale in the room?  you'll get no objections from me from how people are calling out the right wing. yes. 

but what baffles me is that they're doing the same thing their opposition has been doing.

to change anything for sense and sensibility... it is to cheat people out of the past. 
we are not entitled to comfort. 

images and fiction cannot cause harm. only upset if one chooses. to change the rights at the animal kingdom ride, splash mountain... is to think poorly. that isn't respect it's listening to a few "concerned" people that want to exert power. and using it on be half of a conceit on be half of a large portion of the populace that share an identity.. but don't think the same. 


"stories matter" (except if we find issue with a story).

the de facto censorship of Dr Seuss books is alarming and no self described liberal  should ever defend lest they become hypocrites. but it was those hypocrites making the call. we need to be concerned about both de jure and defacto censorship. perhaps even more about the latter because there are no protections against it. 

but who is leading that charge?

even this terminally online super paranoid "billy d" still has gone on record for attacking the far right org that CAUSED THIS GAME TO BE BANNED BY GOVERNMENTS... as "chrristian justice warriors" and admonishing them rightly. 

but i guess when people tar and feather you for that long and say nothing  is happening... when it is... they get nuts. 

to the point where Melonie Mac rightly gets flack and pushback.... from the people that thought she was on their side of creative freedom. 

when one of the most vocal supporters was warning against identity politics even of white people... 

heck there is no gg anymore hasn't been for some time. 


evne then. your "venndiagram". fails when there's a politcial compass pool by Brad Glasgow that showed quite the opposite story that the rest of the media fed us. 

or how the dishonest censors are getting paid by tax payer money. 

in the face of criticsm. 

thing is the same guy that talked about diversity.

i can't even repeat what he said. full chest. and now that's magically gone. the tweet is still there of course. but any associations are now gone. 

https://archive.ph/Q320h

this post. here. is to call out Itch. io effectivley listening to far right orginizations and their smear campaign against a game.

here's that same personl with sweet baby inc embalzed on his profile... with "always polytron". THOSE WERE THE PEOPLE RESPONSIBE ... the leaks from polytron showed that the people at the Indie Game Awards HELD STOCK in Polytron as a tradable company. meaning they were biased and had monitary game to promote phil fish. that's why FEZ has game of the year TWICE which is against the very award show's rules. i can't even repeat what he said. 

but they investigated themselves and found no wrong doing.  and the 

upi 

even puttting people at risk.
credit where it's due

but the credit falls short when you attack someone and try to get them divorced of the licneces and the account for the games they paid for (the licences) and get them banned off of steam because... OF CRITICISM> 

AND THAT THE IDEA THAT THIS IS RIGHT WING... holy crap. I mean what is it called when a government is permissive of free enterprise but steps in to benefit the ideas of the state instead of the individual? 

when there's a government porgram targeting only half the extremism and i went to "take this" in earnest for mental health because of the attacks i got... and then i was kicked to the curb. 
SCREW THAT. 
KABRUTUS, rather his spokes person.   they are crazy and wrong in their own right. ... fair is fair. 

but the cordinated harassment campaign narrartive... that was wrong. the alt right? yellow journalism. 

one can't be THAT against right wing ideas and totalitarianism when there's a government program bending free enterpise to it's own selfish wants. 
and ironically supported by bilionares in this Pseudo-progressive mass movment that thinks everyone is alt right 
to the point of freaking out over a green fro and the ok hand sign. 

it's a GREAT way to be a racket. to take near infinate tax payer money and say we need to combat "the bad guys"> 

When you use the repressive tolerance as said by Marcuse to censor and slander anything against "the one true faith". 

and then th ey said something about how he coudlnt' keep a cat. to go for an archeological dig against his character and offense. 

why is it. that the same things that were done by the right are now forgiven as soon as the color of the flag they fly under is changed.?

and when the far right org NCOSE were found out.. they then used sarkesian style and intersectioanlist  rhetoric to justify?

c'mon. 

SESTA AND FOSTA did not pass by republicans alone. the college book bans and trigger warnings and canceling. that wasn't right wing to start. 

when people mess up and misrepesent history and censor in a way for a politic... because history isnt' politically correct? 
it's almost religious dogma at that point. 

some how we get this

but then very NOT right people approve of covering up rouge the bat? 

that such depictions cause "harm". there's the same alarm bells but coming from something that isn't right wing... at all.. 

as much as it has in common with the right wing. why is the right wing RIGHTLY admonished... when censorship and fascist tendencies are ignored? 

that we have a living and thriving racket of Beta Readers and Sesnitivity consultants, narrative consultants. getting tax payer money to ADVISE and sanitize?

sure a lot of the anti-woke have NO idea what they're talking about. they don't know about Gramcsi and his long march through institutions... Year zero, demoralization... over an elk statue that was said to be white supremacism.... because everything is even when it isn't. 

or the robber barrons of post modernism... post modernism has a place but Chomsky was very good at dismantling THAT. 

you can accuse anyone who drives a car as being anti pedestrian in light of all the violence and vehicular unintentional manslaughter and murder that happens to those on the receiving end of a car.  and even those who don't own a car as being anti pedestrian adjacent and holding up an anti pedestrian culture... 

And it all shares the same dumb language. 

 

 the very thing we were told wasn't happening and now we're told happened and is a good thing. 

it's so totalisticly there .

it got to the point where the making of D&D has a dishonest and even slanderous foreward by some dishonest compiler. 

but those who write the present have control of the past and future. 

so much so that not even the conservitive right wingers were able to cover up bikini Leia and omit the name of Boba Fett's ship for FEAR of bringing up generational trauma or some other equally stupid conceit that thinks SO little of bipoc. 

it gets so bad it becomes almost religious levels of denial. 

and depersoning. 

falsely attacking atlus for "transphobia" homophobia and then attacking and threatening the wrong guy at the company... or whatever that wasn't right wing. 

Some people just switched sides because their principles didn't change... the world did and not for the better. 

https://reason.com/2018/12/31/louis-ck-comedy-leaked-footage-parkland/ the humor didn't change. we did. what was judge through the planet of cops of social media and the current powerstructures... it's baaad. and i'm sick of ignoring the majoirty of the abuse because of the side it comes from or deflecting it on to a convenient explaination that doesn't match material fact.

THE BITTERNESS. is enough to choke a leviathan. 

thing is, totalitarianism comes in all colors and flags and there is a brand of it we're ignoring... because the flag and the conceit is something that pretends to be progress and the continuation of the persuit of human rights... when it's not. 



Did the right wing censor and call for this game to be censored? YES. THEY DESERVE THE WORST SPOT IN HELL TO INFRINGE OF THE VERY CREATIVE FREEOM AND THE HUMAN LIBERTY ENSHRINED IN THE LAW THAT THE CONSTITUTION AND THE FOUNDING FATHERS FOUGHT FOR... THEY DESERVE AN ESPECIALLY HOT SPOT IN THE CIRCLE OF HYPOCRITES. 

 THEY DID. BUT ENABLED BY VERY DISGUSTING AND UNCHECKED ATTITUDES. Chuck Schumer and Hillary Clinton both shat on games and attacked their free expression for decades and with attitudes that are anything but right wing. ... even if they're just as hypocritical as they pointed to a boogie man... 

when, really... 

they're essentally the same people. 

and yes comics too.

let's say you'er right... maybe there was something that pushed people? 
If a conceit is popular. understand why it is. 

you're hoping to just not get bonked with your voyeur game. 

which may be next... because of the insidiously, flighty, mercurial capricious nature of censorship. 

to the point where people lied about the game in the worst faith. 

Ok is it moved there because i still see this organized as 

itch.io Community » General » General Discussion

taking the bait?

what venn diagram? the one you pull out of your butt as the DHS has a department on "focusing on extremism in games"... that isn't extent? 

"stopped associating with gamergate while still holding the values"  uhh. it wasn't or isn't still going on. i mean the lies and slander by media... why internalize that? 

they weren't alt right spokespeople. they are not. 

that is the NCOSE. the very people that were behind sarkesian. Wally Sarkesian  donated to trump. 

the alt right was a panic job as well. for somethign that is so horrible so awful.. there's only three headliners?

meanwhile defending the rights of people... all people... to speak ?  tht gets you tarred and feathered. unfairly. 

https://www.aclu.org/news/free-speech/the-skokie-case-how-i-came-to-represent-th...

and when it gets to the point that Tulsi Gabbard gets called Q-anon or Bill Maher being called right wing... then people have lost the plot

the people against "woke" are the ones saying that this remake was bowdlerized and censored... because it is. 

"saying they got bored and joined government". .. DOESN'T make sense to the material facts. 

"

how is this hate of women? well it isnt' but someone has been convinced of that. this is a post from RESET ERA. 

every damn time. 

Did everyone else forget?

every single time

the very people who acted as "defenders of women" knew about harssment and kept quiet about to keep his access and inside reporting  and then published a book with interviews... so he could make profit. he only came forward when it was public knowledge. 

"A great example is GamerGate... yes; i am aware of the implications on this group of guys who is really hurt over the fact that a lot of games have gone woke"
that isn't qutie that. at all. 
it was for free expression and taking about that apparenlty gets you labeled a white cis het male. 
of many of gg wasn't. 

i'm a minority as well. but the very people that were said to /..

jesus christ Gamergate was the devil of the day and we didn't want the repeat of Jack Thompson.   some how you conflate us... with the censors? 
even when the books and the evidence shows a very different story. Chris Ferguson of Stetson university even spoke out. 
the woke and the ultra conservitives were the ones that not only proved the horseshoe theory was very real. but that they both censor. 

in 2009 as far back as that. Kotaku shamed C. Viper for being a single mom represented in games and showing the reality. 

the current critics like anita sarkesian are a cookie cutter idea of what the misogynist Aristotle used to be. That a man is seen as a person but a woman is seen as different from a man. that a woman is a woman as defined by a lack of qualities. 

and these so called progressives will cover up women replace them with bowls of fruit. and not understand the male gaze and how it was originally meant to be a criticism of film making... that's why "Secret of the Sphinx" was made. 
And since then gaze theory has been updated. 

and some how. as GG fought for free expression. you blame us for the ones being in "power" to stop such things? 
when we can't? never could?   and can't fight against bowlderization? 

and yet this is a tumblr post. 
abuot someone picking apart and saying things are problematic. 
doesn't sound very pro gg to me. 

we see Halo's remasters bowlerize and tone down.. 

let me get this right. the people that complain about woke. ... who rightly criticize Wizards of the coast kowtowing to projecting  people thinking that orcs are stand ins for certian people. ... that censors it's neogi entry in its monster manuals. 

the woke that take out dr seuss books by pressure and moral outratge... 

some how they're the censors? 

well mabye. but holy god. what? 

Can we stop being blamed for something we didn't do and accused for things we're not? 

to stand up against a very controling individuals that have a myopic idea on "progress" and call themselves warriors of justice... as they bowlderize and call for censorship? 

CAN WE GET THE HISTORY RIGHT? 

we are seeing less diverse games. 

sure. some people are idiots. there's some people that are good. but... my god. 

we weren't the ones saying CHANGE THE COVER. 

to the point where language is so edited to the point of absurity. 

by law. it is speech. protected. 

that is objectively incorrect. 

not if you're an activist for reason and free expression. 

you're correct.

how DARE anyone call this good when they care more about polygons than real victims.  and they're always guilty. they project

so an arbitrary line?

why is it a good thing? why finally? if you had a problem why even publish here at all? 

"Polygons are not people, but you should seriously consider what you put out into the world, because everything you put out leads to more of the same and serves as a step for an expansion of same."

no it doesn't. you say they're not people. yet you use the same 

you made a voyeur game. you have no right to speak. what happens when that is taken down because of objectification or some other line being drawn by an alt right hate group? 

Just say you're a hypocrite and go. 

"First of all, this idea from gamers that what you do for entertainment has no effect on the rest of your life is just not true.  I've heard this before, about how people bash gamers for playing violent video games, and how it is essentially bs.  But it is simply incontrovertible that something you spend multiple hours doing every day affects the way you think and see the world.  How could it not?"

Well if it doesn't work for violence how does it work for sexual violence?

"  As I mentioned in another reply, FPS shooters to mass-murderer is not really an apples-to-apples comparison. " they're both violence. it really is that. 
It is dishonest and slimy to say otherwise. 

"or is entertained by the idea of doing so, is absolutely feeding a desire that will grow and create destruction in their life."

that's the same thing said about violence in video games that has since been disproven. the verytthing you call BS.
"I'm really not interested in playing the statistics game. " 
you're not interested in any evidence.

you should not play games. at all. you aren't even fully capable.

who gets to decide? who is good enough? you just want to decide for others or think there's someone good enough who can. but wouldn't that person become the most debauched? how are you or anyone able to even tell what or where these problematic things are? 

"The effect such a game has is bad, as it leads to the normalization and glorification of SA.  " how?

where? there are games that glorify and gamify violence that YOU enjoy if we take a look at what you buy and consume. 

that summary has nothing but an emotional plea and an argument for control out of "concern" over unfounded things. you make bold cliams with no proof. 

are you even human? how many women have YOU hurt? 

you used CHAT GPT to think for you with that summary with no evidence.

on your feelings. 

in fact. the peopel that have such fantasies are on p hub and NO ONE IS HARMED. the more accessablity the more violent crime has gone down. 

The people who speak out against such games and actually surpress. have the worst track record. 

your disagreement to the contrary comes with no evidence. such convictions... should have you seen as dangerous. VERY dangerous. 

ut do you seriously believe that someone who fantasizes about sexual assault (and is aroused by it) is less likely to actually do it than someone who doesn't???

you you can't. the science is clear on that. and you have no issue with GTA V or Mortal Kombat. anyone agreeing with you is bad. 

a facist lite. these are your thoutgs. this was a visual novel. not a "simulator". 

how unfortuanate now how could I contact such staff? 

"i see that as a good thing"

because you weren't bonked. 

in the words of Huey freeman. 
 why are you afraid to be judged and not say the right thing? 

ok thank you but what is that categroy and why did you move it? Is it still able to be seen?

We had the same problems of mortal kombat. had the years been different and Mortal Kombat came out today, it would not be able to be. 

i never thought people would lose or not remember their own history and welcome totalitarianism with welcome arms. 

In Short, 

The campaign against No Mercy was built on mischaracterization, fear, and moralism — not facts. "This was objectionable to some.. It was polarizing. But it didn’t hurt anyone — and if we cannot allow that, we’ve abandoned the foundation of artistic freedom.

If you want to insult or go against this. Ask yourself. why is it you get to use the ability to freely disagree... as you also argue against the principles that allow you to do so? because of the "nature of the content"? get real. What happens when the gun you use is pointed on you?The whole conceit for this censorship is irrational and bunk. So with that lack of reasons what's stopping them from having some other strange false justification to target this whole website? 

The censorship of controversial video games like No Mercy by Zerat Games reveals a chilling pattern of ideological suppression masquerading as protection. Groups like the National Center on Sexual Exploitation (NCOSE) and other moral crusaders have targeted games, adult creators, and sexual expression by co-opting feminist rhetoric while aligning with conservative Christian nationalist goals. This essay examines how the No Mercy controversy embodies a broader historical and political assault on artistic freedom, fueled by panic, misinformation, and financial censorship. We argue that suppressing such works causes more harm than good—and that defending difficult fiction is a matter of cultural survival.

Let's make this very clear.