Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
Tags
(1 edit) (+2)

I believe games should either be what we'll call 'cowboys' or 'firefighters.' All games that currently and will ever exist fall into one of these two categories and should be judged as such. Before I get into the review I think it should be clear about what these terms mean:

Cowboys:
These are primarily games that contain, feature, or are developed by horses. This is not always the case, though. When this is not the case, we can think of these games as games that evoke the feeling of the great American West, manifest destiny, and imperialism. But also, freedom, elegance, money, gold, settlers, California, and mountains. These games are defined by their commitment to exploration and a steadfast belief in games as entertainment. 

Firefighters:
These are games that are 100% reactionary, reacting to current trends, ideas, thoughts, beliefs, people, places, or things. For example, every game that is made by AI automatically falls into this category. Every sequel and game with more than one character also has the potential to fall into this category. 

Now that we've cleared that up, I know you're all thinking: "What about games that are politicians?!" Obviously, I have intentionally excluded the final third category of games up to this point in a narrative device known as 'burying the lead." You may also be thinking that this game is obviously a boat-type game. Unfortunately, the game is outside of the scope of this review due to semantics. 

Due to the lack of genre examples, I've also excluded farmer games from this dichotomy. 

In other words, this game is clearly interested in more than just the price of bread, and I have a lot of respect for that. To me, it's an obvious 8/10 for lack of a visible controller. But, I think I will increase it to a 9/10 because it's a game I could see people 1,000 years ago enjoying or people 150 years in the future loving, in other words, timeless! That also in my opinion, brings it down to a 7/10 because it's kinda pandering to such a massive audience trying to capture an audience like that. 

That being said, my gut says that I should give it a solid 8/10. 

(+1)

Fantastic ideas that really expanded my world-view (I was reminded of Horsegirl Goes to Heaven, which is an easy pick for a cowboy-type game... or so you would think as the game definitely falls outside the "entertainment" category imo), however I'm not sure where exactly you were going with the game distinctions. If you were burying the lead with the politician games, is Please, review my game a politician game according to you? Or something else entirely? Why/why not?

I also really liked you walking me through your adjustments of the final grade. It really made me feel involved in your process. One thing I liked less is when you said "I know you're all thinking", which made me feel like you wrote this review for a large audience rather than just me, which made me feel jealous and sad. Even if it was intended for several people, I think using the plural here took this from the feeling of an intimate discussion between friends towards a public lecture, which made me feel very much alienated.

13/20 although if I was rating based on originality alone this would get a 20.

I mentioned in my review that reviewing the game is kind of outside the scope of the review due to semantics. Everything that follows that is largely nonsense, up to my final thoughts. 

Ah... Unfortunately the grading rubric in this project does not reward nonsense (well actually I suppose in some way it does reward it in the emotional and wit section but only indirectly). Perhaps in a future installment? Thank you for your clarification.

These are interesting categories that seem (at least to me) to neatly describe the vast majority of games out there. Would you also consider the existence of a "Garfield" category? Games such as Garfield Kart (2012) and Lasagnator (1991) are sufficiently complex and multifaceted that I don't feel comfortable sorting them into any of the existing categories.

Interesting question. It also makes me wonder. At the same time I feel like we are straying a bit too far away from the discussion of my game which makes me feel excluded. 

5/10