yes, there are suggestive character designs, but a lot of triple a game dev companies utilize them subconsciously. suggestive character designs don't mean that a game is a erotic/pornographic one.
don't take this as basement dweller/incel/redpill/alt-right rhetoric, i have no interest in trying 2 save games from healthy explorations of identity n sexuality, but it is baffling to me how you can label this an erotic game when the only thing thats erotic about it, imo, is the character designs.
imo it's like calling an rpg game an action game just because it has gunfighting. while, yes, gunfighting is a feature in a lot of action titles, it's not an inherent quality in the action genre, and it doesn't mean that the rpg in question is an action title.
am i bugging? maybe i'm missing something or wasting my time here, but if you label this an erotic game, when the only thing erotic about it is the character designs, and you yourself don't see it as a pornographic/erotic game, then why are you labelling it that?