Skip to main content

Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
TagsGame Engines
Admin (1 edit) (+1)

There are many scenarios where removing one or many participants may substantially change the line up of the bundle in a way that may be misleading to the other participants. I could imagine us adding something in the future that lets you remove participants if it represents under a certain percentage of the total bundle.

A follow up question I have is why are are there people in the bundle you have organized who don’t end up approving the bundle? Were random people added with the hope that they would participate?

I can’t imagine why you would see the approval process as a means to “annoy” others unless you’ve invited untrustworthy people to the bundle.

(+1)

The 2 bundles where I saw people refusing to accept the bundle later had basically the following scenario: (i did not host them.)

The admin made a game jam where everyone could submit games to the bundle if they liked. It was stated that everything submitted will put into the bundle after a certain date. In both cases, people submitted their stuff to the game jam, then waited for the bundle host to create the bundle, waited that more than 50 percent accepted the bundle, and then publically stated they wanted to get out of the bundle. These persons had plenty of time to leave the bundle beforehand, but instead, they decided that they wanted to leave the bundle at the time when it would cause the most trouble for everyone else involved. 

This is what I meant by "to annoy other people"

(+2)

He did never add random people to any bundle but had people who wanted to join actively submit their stuff.  Everytime. And the people who refused to accept actively submitted their stuff. But extremely later, they changed their decision. (They changed their decision exactly at the moment where it was the most complicated to reverse it.) 

(+2)

This indeed what happened.