My point still remains: you're selling (from a 12 dollars top) a pack of things that you didn't make. You're doing all of this to update it, but if you wanted to do that why reselling it without any update? For now, you're only gaining some money with a bunch of sprites that you didn't make. You know, it kinda seems a "visibility" move more than an "honourable" move
2 years ago(+1)
It already has been updated with RPG maker packaging + color swap (of course, that's nothing : just an initial setup). Here's an overview of the complete set to draw for the upcoming months :
"Visibility" VS "Honourable" : why not both ? I'm running a business but you know I'm redistributing a part of my revenue to the pixelart community since you read my Twitter bio. I'm not tricking anyone, c'mon.
2 years ago(-1)
Look, if you want to keep avoiding the main point of this discussion, fine by me. Still mind-blown that, for you, this is normal, but everyone sees things differently, I guess.
2 years ago(+1)
I think that buying the ‘license’ to resell this asset was somewhat understandable, considering that they were a team- however, I still do agree that it’s a bit dishonorable to resell the asset as is. The least that you could’ve done is attribute Noiracide in the description of the asset, even if Noiracide was okay without attribution in the agreement you two made. This seems to be hurting your honorability and putting you in a bad light. This is just my input though, I don’t have that much context regarding the scenario.