Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
Tags

i encourage you to keep improving this.

software should never be "final"

if all you ever wanted to do was make a RGM+ then you already did it, just finish the manual and bugfix. i just don't think that should be the end.

if a new rendering engine can allow you to implement new features into the editor, then i say go for it. take your time. if you work on this project for the next 10 years, improving it and expanding it, then people will keep buying it.

i know it's not your fulltime job. noone can realistically demand you "fix this asap" etc etc.

if it was libre-sourced other people could help you. but i know you don't want to do that.

(3 edits) (+1)

Problem is - end users don't really care en masse about the future of the product they use. I, myself, donated triple the price of the PRO version, when this program was in its infancy, so to say, in hopes of seeing something that I can use to make something that I can call a finished product and wouldn't be ashamed to sell. This editor was extremely close to the point of hitting the right spot - it had Turing complete internal scripting language with graphics output  - a simple algorithmic language, I must note - a very important thing for those, who can't speak JavaScript, or Ruby, or Python, etc. It even had an improvised form of stable database in form of global and local variables, which could be addressed in code on call and used to program the objects behavior.

Updating the project and improving it is great - moving goalposts isn't.

I was really eager to purchase the PRO version, when I saw all new great tools which I could use - only to be disappointed when I learned that scripting language and automates were missing and there was no clear indication when they will return and in what form. Promises of its coming are not going to sweeten the hard pill to swallow. I saw many and many project like these to die out, when author was too busy rewriting stuff that was already acceptable for the users, eventually failing with achieving what was planned, but not returning old features back and abandoning the project entirely.

Change something to make it better? I'm fine with that. Stripping me of options I already had before the change will be complete, without tuning them out and forcing me to switch to older versions because now they are better versions - no, I'm not fine with that - this is just cruel and nearsighted.

I perfectly understand, that I could not see the whole picture of it, but I'm not to be blamed, since were not shown that much except of many red flags. And some of us already burned a lot by buying unfinished products hanging on promises of future completion. The future, that often never comes.

(+1)

well i donated more than what pro version cost as well.

you are entitled to your opinion, and to your pessimism.

i am entitled to my opinion, and to my optimism.

There is literally nothing missing from older versions.

1.5 was not made from scratch, it was built upon older versions. You can use everything all the same there were only minor changes on which you could get info by just asking about it.

Now I can see your point but I never explicitly told FSM and scripting were missing. As many people here already found out by using the old manual.

What is FSM? :)