“Moves the constraint, not the furniture” is definitely sticking with me.
I don't want a second case to just be the same five slots with different names either. If I come back to this, the case-file limit should create a different problem, not just contain a different puzzle.
And your point about the unused question at the end got me thinking. This case should stop where its evidence stops — but that doesn't necessarily mean the investigation has to stop there.
Thanks for this. You may have planted the seed for something :)