Skip to main content

Browse GamesGame JamsUpload GameDeveloper LogsCommunity
Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
TagsGame Engines
Eldwood25 days ago

And now you won’t accept the argument why this is not so.

You haven’t presented an argument, much less a convincing one. You’ve just made an assertion.

The facts:

  1. The reseller appears multiple times on the Top Seller page for the tileset tag.
  2. The reseller has almost 500 followers. There is no evidence to support the hypothesis that there is significant overlap between these followers and the buyers.
  3. In two separate instances buyers have made posts in the community forum expressing buyer’s regret, with one buyer describing the asset as “very poor quality”. Which is AFAIK a new record, even if it doesn’t seem like a lot in absolute terms.

How do you reconcile point 3 with points 1 and 2? I have presented several possibilities. You have simply ignored point 3.

Reply
redonihunter24 days ago
You haven’t presented an argument, much less a convincing one. You’ve just made an assertion.

That's exactly what you did. And your first assertion was to imply that most of the followers were non humans. It's not plausible and I pointed out why it is not plausible. 

And now you try to rescue this by asserting how those followers are not actually customers - which is a different claim, btw. You shifted the goal post. I am only arguing that it is normal for creators of popular projects to have many (human) followers. 

Of course we cannot prove that a particular follower has bought something, or is a happy customer or a human. But the fact that we cannot prove this, does not prove the opposite. But we do know that the follower metric correlates with success, popularity and sales. This of course does not prove that any particular developer did not fake followers, but the mere theoretical possibilty also does not prove that it is so.

Another ai asset seller on top of those lists has 400 followers and currently a sale that shows how many purchases were made. 845 contributors as of my writing with nearly $ 10k.

There is a market for ai assets. And if there is a market for something, there will be people that follow the "good" creators, instead of the "bad". Those numbers correlate. We do not know the factor, but if one goes up, the other goes up too. One does not get followers just by spamming projects. That's what the slop creators try to do. And that is why they are so annoying.

But this does not mean, that all the creators that use these things create slop. There is no direct causal connection. Just as there is no causal connection of using human made assets and thus your works are automatically not slop. Slop means low effort. The lowest effort is using free assets (no matter if ai or human made). 

Maybe it makes you feel better, if you look at the follower counts of human ai asset creators. Those are about 10x as high. And both of the ai sellers are currently high in ranking because they have a discount sale. But they do have a market and it logically follows that they do have real followers because of that.

Reply
Eldwood23 days ago

Your claims were:

  • Not all AI-generated output is slop.
  • This particular AI-generated isn’t slop.
  • That this particular AI output is popular proves that it isn’t slop.

I took issue with the third claim in particular, because:

  • Popularity can be faked, and is faked all the time.
  • Slop gets popular all the time.
  • This particular AI output clearly is slop. I mean, just look at it. Also look at the bigger context. A bundle of 330+ tilesets by this reseller. All that I checked, with one non-AI exception, were published 2026. That’s more than one tileset per day. How much effort do you think went into each individual tileset?

Do people use fake accounts to boost their popularity? Absolutely. Did this particular reseller use fake accounts to boost their popularity? I have no way of knowing, and neither do you. I raised it as a possibility, and I still think it’s plausible, but I never claimed it as a definite truth. So I also presented other possibilities. Including the possibility that the popularity is real, and some people just really like this slop. That wouldn’t make it non-slop, it would just make it popular slop.

Reply
redonihunter23 days ago
I raised it as a possibility, and I still think it’s plausible

That's not raising a possibilty. That's a baseless accusation.

Including the possibility that the popularity is real

I must have missed that. You did your best to explain ways how they would be not real.

Popularity can be faked, and is faked all the time.

We talking about Itch projects here. I have seen someone here who I saw how the popularity was faked. It was done by simple f4f and might not be seen as fake. But this did not result in sales in that example. It might have resulted in short term popularity, I did not check that.

So I am fully aware that there is empty popularity that does not translate into sales. And that is why I cited actual sale figures. Because those are not easily faked or explained away. On that bundle sale I linked for that other developer are 800 buyers and 400 followers. Those followers are not the empty kind. There are no indicators, as we can see factual sales happening with more than twice that number.

This particular AI output clearly is slop. I mean, just look at it

Then I can tell by the pixels? That what you mean?

That asset creator is so sloppy that there are even updates for the slop. It is pixel art. What am I supposed to see? There is only circumstancial hints that it is made with help of gen ai. I can tell for a lot of images and bigger character images, that they have the ai look. But something with so few pixels is very hard to tell. I do not see consistency problems that would hint at ai or other signs. So what in the images clearly tells you that this is ai?

We do not know how much hand edited those assets are. That the developer does updates for some of those packs tells me, that this is not 1-pass ai slop. There are iterations. Refinement. Combined with the many followers in comparison to other ai asset creators, yes, that is not the slop type of ai creator. There is one asset from 2024 and if you dig, you can find that in 2025 there were also assets released that are now removed. Unless you now claim that the asset pack from 2024 is a blatant lie and also gen ai created, we can assume that this person knows how create such assets manually.

AI in the hands of someone skilled in both ai and the craft the ai should do, can do wonders. My best guess is, that after initial tests that dev migrated to an ai assisted workflow and does this now fulltime. 

The ai slop I see is when people not skilled in one or often both of those skills release projects.

Reply
AboutFAQBlogContact us
Copyright © 2026 itch corp · Directory · Terms · Privacy · Cookies