Judge feedback

Judge feedback is anonymous and shown in a random order.

• Incredible watercolors and a consistent aesthetic, but there's just not much game there--I feel your scores should go somewhere, contribute to a field campaign, get increasingly difficult, etc. Small bug: if the timer finishes when a fish is just appearing, it gets counted against your score. Somehow the arrow keys keep running even when the score page comes up as well.
• This is a very cute and simple fun game! The watercolor like graphic is beautiful and effective. The design wise, if the boots are in the game play window, for example, placing a person wearing the boots in the game somewhere, it'd tie the title and the actual game more nicely. The game very was fun to play, but I wasn't sure about the consequence of missing fish and hitting wrong buttons and how to interpret the "error" number shown at the end. It's very Alaskan game!
• Boots was very educational/science-oriented and had wonderful graphics. The game mechanics were very simple but well thought out. There were some issues with the counting and once the player has figured out a system to play would want something more to do, or increased challenge, or different fish to see.
• The graphics for this game were really beautiful! The concept really brought me into the world of fish counting and how difficult it must be. The sound, graphics, and gameplay were great across the board. I still haven't become a very good counter yet, but I will continue to try to be better. Great job!
• This game has the best graphics in my opinion, and took the most literal approch to the scientific theme. I love the story idea to focus on the boots of the researchers, and I can see how the second half of the game would have followed this theme as well. Great work.