Skip to main content

Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
TagsGame Engines
(2 edits) (+3)

No, this is great and exactly what I was hoping to see!! Thank you for sharing your thoughts! 

Responding with a few (possibly longer!) thoughts of my own:

The neurodivergent angle is super interesting, and not one I had considered could be important even though I'm also part of that group myself! I feel like your explanation makes a lot of sense and is very plausible, though personally I find the "non-neurodivergent" angle equally plausible (explanation below).
But I'll revisit the story when I have a chance with that interpretation in mind, I wonder if I'll pick up on something new this time!

I also hadn't considered some of those options for the ending, they seem plausible too! I did get the impression that the end was left intentionally vague, and I thought it was very well-done overall. It felt fairly optimistic to me, especially with the little afterword that follows!

I will say that I've tried to visit every page in the story over a few playthroughs, but it's possible I missed an option somewhere or glossed over an important detail in the text, which could affect my interpretations!

That being said, it seemed to me like the kid may not even have done anything intense or out of the ordinary to trigger the "punishments".
Like you, I definitely saw the mother as abusive, and I also feel like she's probably not fully aware of the damage she's doing. But the impression I got was that she's not purely misguided—I think she has some deeper issues of her own (e.g. trouble controlling her emotions or communicating in a healthy way).

These things really stood out to me:
- Her face suddenly shuttering during what seemed like an innocent moment to the kid
- Seemingly not explaining at all what the transgression was
- Possibly getting carried away by her anger (grabbing the arm very hard, slamming down the hourglass)
- Punishing the kid for needing a bathroom break

It is possible that the kid is misremembering the events and there actually was something like a meltdown or big "misbehaviour" followed by an explanation, though! That just wasn't my initial reading. The mom came across to me as being quick to anger and emotionally closed-off, and the kid's self-doubt and anxiety felt like it was strongly fueled by that. 

Thinking about it some more, I do think it could easily be both things at once—the kid "misbehaving" in ways that make the mother's personal issues even worse! One thing I like about focusing more specifically on the mother's behaviour is the message that if a parent has certain kinds of unhealed issues, it may not even matter how "well-behaved" a kid is, because even completely normal and innocent things can set off an explosion. But I do also love the focus on what the kid can do or has control over in that situation, and the whole "freedom" angle you discuss (plus thinking about the possible misunderstandings from both of their brains working so differently)!

Sorry that was a little disorganized, hopefully it still made sense... you gave me a lot of interesting points to think about!

(3 edits) (+3)

No problem at all, I'm a senior in English so I'm a massive dweeb for these kinds of conversations! (Also don't worry this all still made sense to me!)

I completely missed the afterword I can't lie (I was playing all of the games one after the other on call with a friend so I didn't read the credits too well, that's my bad!). That definitely rules out the ending being something like suicide, but I think running away or contacting someone who can help (in a more positive light than I was originally thinking of) is still pretty plausible!

As for the kid not doing anything intense to potentially get in trouble, I'm looking at this beginning again and I read "you don't know what triggered it" as the "it" being the meltdown. I say meltdown, because as I'm rereading it, this is ringing autism bells in my head due to the passages following it: that the mother doesn't like it when the kid shuts down, goes quiet, doesn't look at her face, doesn't seem to listen, all of this being highlighted in red text... those are like, textbook autism symptoms (and potentially ADHD as well but I am not as well informed in that realm since that's not my personal diagnosis).  Also, what may seem as normal for someone who's autistic or neurodivergent in general may seem strange, out of the ordinary, or even offensive to someone neurotypical*, so the kid is a tiny bit unreliable in this sense without the context of what actually went on. If it wasn't a meltdown (which it isn't specified and I agree with you that it's just as plausible that your reading of that sentence is correct and the poor kid didn't actually do anything that intense), I feel like it may have been something a little too blunt or rude, "talking back" when the kid was just trying to be honest, which would explain why the kid doesn't seem to understand in your reading.

EDIT: Wait I just read a bit further and the kid does mentions that they didn't know what happened. Disregard that about the meltdown!

As for the mother, I 100% agree that she's not well adjusted and that it could be both things at once. After all, well-adjusted parents know better than to be abusive. Quick-to-anger parents can do this sort of thing to any kid, and the mental effects of anxiety and self-doubt can happen to any kid being abused as well, so the non-neurodivergency reading is very understandable! And yeah the bathroom break thing, if I may break from my mostly semi-respectful explaining here, is super fucked up and I hope she explodes for that.

But yeah, no problem at all! Thanks for replying, I didn't expect such a well thought-out response and I'm so glad I got one because I love yapping about these things :)

(+2)

Hello yes I have finally actually looked at these comments and seem to have sparked an amazing level of discussion, thank you both so much for reading so closely and putting so much thought into this!

I don't want to place my own interpretations over those of readers - it should speak for itself, and anything you get out of it is valid. That said, here's what was going through my mind as I was writing:

- Mother definitely abusive, more definitely so than the king, but still rooted in a misguided sense of "fixing" the kid

- Kid most probably autistic, but: leaving open the possibility of shutting down / avoiding eye contact / &c. purely as a trauma response to abuse and/or because of some other neurodivergence

- Also leaving room for a queer interpretation

- Ending intentionally vague, but I was definitely going for a hopeful vibe (I can see where the suicide thought came from, and tried to minimise it without completely ruling it out) and for that hopefulness being related to the mirror, ie, to recognising the autism / mystery other neurodivergence / queerness / whatever other trait the mother is fixating on fixing; thus, to realising the [trait] is a part of themselves, not inherently monstrous or bad. So, the ending is vague and open to interpretation, but could be along the lines of running away, finding [trait]-specific supports, transitioning, calling support services for help, etc.

(+1)

https://itch.io/post/16032570