Wait, what? He used AI just to fix some stuff recently. 99.9% of the game was made by hand
so another lie from a pedo dog fucker plus you haven't read any of my comments if you think i write about only one subject, and its funny your projecting what you are onto other plus multiple people I've called pedophiles want to create games that sexualize kids and even defend sites that allow child porn on them, keep projecting.
Within the game itself? As far as I know (I've played the game a couple of times now) he hasn't used the songs that he has on his channel. I think he mentioned they were made with AI, but I think someone ELSE "made" them, he's just sharing them and said that he'll likely not use them in the game because they "don't fit the game's vibe" much.
I'm not playing through the game again to see if what you're telling is true. So I'll have to take your word for it.
But ethically speaking it's still INCREDIBLY unethical to create, promote or even share music made from Suno.
Suno, the company, has a joint agreement with Warner Music Group, so that they can use their ENTIRE catalog of music to train on.
If you want the entire list of labels, and artists under WMG, then I suggest you look it up. IT IS HUGE.
I get what you're saying, and if the author were claiming the music as his own composition, I could see it being an ethical issue. College kids using AI to create term papers, do homework, etc. is honestly not 'wrong' per se, but in the end it defeats the purpose of attending school in the first place: to sharpen themselves into smart, functional adults capable of more. It is wrong, in the sense that the one you are wronging is yourself. A bit of a moral 'grey area', if you will.
However, of you are a solo dev, or limited by resources on how much you can spend, etc., using a free AI source to dress up your own work doesn't seem like it's an egregious sin-- as long as you site the source, and don't claim credit for anything you don't do (arrangement, selection, etc.) and give those who are opposed, for whatever reasons, a warning to steer clear.
That said, I reiterate that I get your point of view, but don't necessarily agree with how severe you seem to think the ethical breach is. just my $.02.
