First of all, thank you so much for such a detailed review. It really means a lot to me. I’m happy that you found the game interesting and enjoyable.
Your point about what happens when a player’s reasoning doesn’t match the way the moral dilemma is framed (like in the examples with guns or the factory) is very insightful. I think this situation could come up quite often, depending on the person and their perspective.
I’ll definitely think about how to make this more flexible. Maybe by adding more branches, or by introducing an option like “I have my own op,” which wouldn’t directly affect the final calculation. This is truly valuable feedback, and it gives me a lot to think about.
If you have any ideas about how you, as a player, would like this to work, I would love to hear them.
And once again, thank you very much for taking the time to write such a thoughtful review of my work. I really appreciate it!