Post by Courtana in Human Made comments

Viewing post in Human Made comments

This is great! My local group was having a discussion about Gen AI use when a guy used it to write the rules for his game (he didn't even make a human editing pass.)

Since people are using Gen AI for more than just art, would you be open to revising the limitations to include text and/or rules?

HINOKODO4 days ago(+1)

hmm interesting, i do use 'images' and 'art' a lot here.
What would be a better word you think?

My intentions with this are to cover anything creative. I wonder if someone would purposely use ai to write, but use public domain art and try to claim the right to use this icon. Seems like they missed the message. Would wording change the actions of this kind of person? If so, we gotta find the right word!

Courtana4 days ago(+2)

I would personally go with "content", but I also understand if that's too broad.

Another option is to rephrase it to say "AI was not used in any part of the process", "the project should not use AI for art, writing, etc", or something like that.

Lajawi2 days ago(+1)

Personally, especially in the game industry, I see programming as part of the art, which should be included to be hand-made to use the icon, but that’s just my opinion.

HINOKODO2 days ago(+1)

I also agree. I think anything people make is art. And language (coding or communication) should come from people. Coding is definitely an art (i'm very bad at it)

itch.io

Viewing post in Human Made comments