From your answers it seems to me like you're not OK with humiliation and degradation fetish content when LGBTQ+ people or women are in the submissive role. This is ironic to me considering your apparent desire for inclusivity. Maybe you're not aware that people enjoy being in those roles (and fantasizing about being in them) in BDSM fetish play?
Also I noticed that you still use a lot of vague phrases like "how it's presented", "how you execute it" without saying what you mean. As I was wondering if there's a reason for that, I read this statement: "Because to me, the fact men are mostly in power excuses pretty much all those elements. Not to mention many of them are transphobic and to be honest, could care less how cis guys are presented, as long as, like I said, the treatment doesn't extend to LGBTQT+ and women."
Wow. Again you seem to think depiction of a person in a humiliation role is something bad that would need to be "excuse[d]".. but then shockingly you say you don't care if that person is a cis man because "many of them are transphobic"?! I truly hope that nobody ever paints you with as broad a brush as you have just painted most men, and that nobody ever uses that prejudice to justify indifference toward your (perceived) suffering or harm.
Thanks for answering my questions but I'm not going to continue this conversation further. I'm really not a fan of this kind of thinking. I think I understand why you avoid stating your actual opinions plainly -- when laid bare they're not so kind.