Skip to main content

On Sale: GamesAssetsToolsTabletopComics
Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
TagsGame Engines
(+2)

Okay so I played this a couple of times and I have so many questions. Like this is going to keep me up at night waiting for day 3 to come out. I got the Bad Ending. And looking at it, I am so curious on Harlequin's behaviour in the game. He seems to only go after things that Pierrot wants. I am so curious on why he behaves like this. Yes, I did see the scene where Harlequin kills Pierrot's love (maybe because of jealousy?) but that doesn't seem to explain why he chooses to ruin things Pierrot loves ( I might be going nowhere with this analysis).


Anyway, beside that, we need to theorise why Pierrot is the only one that isn't allowed to openly speak?? And how his mask is different from what he is supposed to represent. ''a sad white-painted face'' - google, he is happy all the time we see him. And I might be confused about this, but the pink one which we know died has 2 different accounts of her death. One is due to sacrifice by the whole squad of monsters and the other by Harlequin himself. Maybe the monsters are like making stories up to confuse the protaganist or something. 

But im like super excited for day 3!! Ts is like seriously good.

(2 edits) (+4)

The pink one who we know to be Columbina actually has three accounts of her death atm.  Harlequin’s puppet show, jester’s play and Ticket taker’s mirror. We are told that each one made their own account of the event to protect themselves from the trauma of what happened. This means that each account leaves out the parts that the story teller can’t/won’t accept. For example, Harlequin doesn’t mention the romance and tries to play off her death as a willing sacrifice which we know to be a lie. While Jester focuses solely on the love triangle and completely leaves out the part of her being eaten and the situation that influenced that tragic outcome other than the love triangle. 

The mirror version is portrayed as being Columbina’s own retelling of the event but interestingly it’s the Ticket taker who encouraged us to look into that particular mirror. The mirror is the one I believe to be the most accurate version. I think only by repeatedly viewing these stories and comparing them can we get an idea of what really was going on. 

I love discussing theories on this game though. There’s just so much to unpack 

(+1)

i dint notice that diferent perspectives, nice

(+1)

omg thanks, i didnt notice that at the time since i hadnt unlocked it yet. Honestly replaying the scene again makes me  wonder if each of the character's roles affect the retelling of Columbia's tale from their perspectives.  Like since Harlequin is a Harlequin (who are tricksters and stir chaos, as far as my understanding goes). Perhaps his retelling of the story is told in a way to handle his guilt and bring chaos. My reasoning for this is that I have a feeling Harlequin knows about all the events leading to Columbia death but is too stubborn and focuses on the fact that everyone decided to sacrifice her, which brings chaos (accidently if subconsciously he focuses? or purposely if he willingly focuses too much on everyone's part on the murder) between his relationship and Pierrot's. Jester during the hidden scene says '' Your poison isn't stronger than him'' and then Quin says ''Isn't it? I would love to find out.'' Which well to me implies that Quin knows what event the Jester is referring to ( his envy is the poison and that it is no longer stronger than Pierrot; I think the poison is the envy because in the Jester's puppet show, the name card for Quin is ''The poison'' and his dialogue is basically admitting to loving rage and pain - hate basically which is borne out of envy. To me, this shows he purposely focuses on the team effort on Columbina's death but my interpretation feels kind of weak to me. 

I have this sense that Quin did a mercy kill with Columbina. Because when Columbina says ''I am scared. If they try to touch me again...Will you save me?''

Quin replies by ''Save...?'' I just think it's interesting they used ellipsis instead of just ''Save?''. The ellipsis makes the tone of his dialogue hesitant, like he is thinking of something (might just be me, I think ellipsis is to express uncertainty). If it was just ''Save?'' , there is not uncertainty anymore, it feels like he is mockingly asking her.

Beside that point, Columbina says ''Thank you'' after he devours her head.  He kind of is protecting her.  She is saved from the strangers' touches now atleast. I have a feeling he felt the need to do this because it saves her and feeds his kin. He might have known Pierrot would never do such a thing because he wants to be with Columbina forever, sure he hates what she is going through but I have a feeling Pierrot would allow her to suffer if it meant he would be by her side. Quin might have also killed her because of uncertainty on how he is supposed to save her, idk he might be new to this. Columbina might not see this as her being saved but Quin might, since in Quin's show she is shown to say ''Please help me, I don't want to die'', I am curious who she was asking for help from though.. 


Also, this is random but I think this circus is not the original circus. If you look at the the broken mirror in the blue tent, it shows red text like ''Their smiles are not normal'' or ''Get out of town'' , but most importantly, for my point atleast ''HAHAHAHAHAHAHA'', which is also very similar to what Quin says after stabbing Columbina's chest with his claws in Jester's show, ''HAHAAH'' (something along those lines). I have a feeling he went mental and decided to burn the original circus down the next morning after Columbina's death. But this might be wrong because it could be that the mirrors in the blue tent are actually showing what the future could be or showing what the true nature of the circus is. I said what the future could be because maybe in the future Pierrot keeps us with him for forever and Quin eats us (in the endings) which is what the mirrors show. Or it is showing the true nature of our environment. Pierrot isn't just some intense fun lover, he actually wants to keep us forever and won't let us leave. Quin is not just some bold flirter, he will literally eat us if not for the rules. The mirrors might even just be a way for the victims of the circus to communicate with the living or something. I doubt they were just ''illusions''. But that is just me. 

(4 edits) (+1)

Omg the reference to the broken mirror- Buddy you're onto something 😭🙏 But I believe it's mostly how the members of the circus were despised since they're "freaks," like what happened with Pierrot at the beginning of the story. "Abominations! Get out of our town! FREAKS!" I don't think there is any sort of connection to Harlequin, but... I like that idea!

We know the story of Colombina's death but I feel like Harlequin's motive has not been crystal clear. The only thing that has changed in the three different versions of the retelling was why Harlequin killed Colombina. Did he just did out of hunger or even a desire to feed Pierrot and the rest? Or perhaps did he want to save Colombina? Or was it just because he was envious? It's too vague and it's really bugging me... Does he even regret his actions?! I refuse to believe that he's just completely evil, but he does not show any signs of remorse for that crime. At the same time, the role of Arlecchino is supposed to be multifaceted.

Your analysis on the tragic event is very great, I must say, such as the remark about the ellipsis; I also thought of the same thing. The numerous mention of Harlequin being poisonous feels more like an actual fact than a metaphor at this point💀
But at the same time... Colombina has explicitly said that she did NOT want to die -- it wasn't an option -- so for her to thank Harlequin for killing her is practically agreeing that death will somehow grant her protection... Let us also remember that she thanked him BEFORE he killed her, as if she he must have thought he got out of the cage to protect her but instead: attacked her. I also wanna point out that Jester had absolutely no problem with Colombina being sacrificed.

(1 edit) (+1)

I don’t think Pierrot would allow the humans to do anything bad to Columbina. Remember that’s exactly how they ended up in that situation in the first place. Some humans showed an interest in her and Pierrot stepped in to protect her. But then they injured him so badly that he was left unable to move, likely near death and for what was likely the first time in their captivity, he couldn’t protect her from anything. Columbina, then turns to Harlequin for help who takes advantage of the situation to provide the others and himself with food for strength to turn on their captors. It could be that Harlequin thought he was protecting her in a twisted sense but my interpretation was that Harlequin might have been insulted by the request. Perhaps he found it audacious for her to expect his protection when she had chosen Pierrot over him. And only once Pierrot can’t protect her does she turn to him for help. He may have thought “You aren’t mine to protect so why should I protect you when the rest of us are starving and you’re the weakest one. Instead..why don’t YOU save US by giving us the strength to fight back?” Obviously this is a very negative interpretation of the events and may not be correct. Even if it is, it might only be partially correct as I’ve realised that Harlequin is extremely complicated and difficult to read. There’s probably multiple reasons why he does things and not a straight forward answer. The creator has said that when it comes to harlequin, even when out right says how he’s feeling/thinking you don’t know if you should believe him or not. 

Cool theory!

(7 edits) (+1)

Oh my God...! I feel like I just had an epiphany with your theory. I'm taking your interpretation (if you don't mind and not as my own of course) to further understand the story and its characters; it might as well be true! Allow me to share:

In the commedia dell'arte, Columbine chose Harlequin over Pierrot, but in this story, Columbina chose Pierrot. The role of Columbine is a soubrette which is not exactly what Columbina was portrayed -- more of an ingénue. I thought that Neko just decided to go on with his story and not follow exactly the stock character, but it does make sense: Colombina has chosen Harlequin in the end for she has turned to him for protection (despite rejecting him all this time). Thus, she probably didn't love Pierrot for what he is but mostly for the attention, gifts, and protection he was offering... And so it was easy for him to get replaced: all she cared about was to live, not him...

That is just insane because then it would make Pierrot's character more tragic (as it already was), defend Harlequin's actions (just a little since it explains why the rest were not so fond of her/why it was so easy for them to be okay with her death -- she was exploiting Pierrot and lead him to agony), and tell more about Columbina's true character.
Not even a monster could love Pierrot... This is of course just a theory and personal speculations. Thank you for sharing this with us @Princess Spooky Suki! KUDOS ❤

That. Is. one. of. the. greastest. therories. I. have. ever. heard.

(+1)

THANK YOU<33333

(+1)

Maybe they all represent an animal to act as one????? Okay hear me out! We know harlequin is the poison in the jesters show and the color palet on harlequin is green and black. That could represent a snake since snakes are poisonus and the color accosiated with poison is green! Plus is that some snakes are black colored. And harlequin actually acts a bit snakey(NEW WORD UNLOCKED!) bc he is always Kinda jealous and is acted as a 'kind' character, while he is really, insted evil. Hes like twisting a poisonus knife! Soon can columbia mean flamingo since they are often described as Beautiful and represents beauty and love! Pierrot can be a red panda who is shy and silent! And thats my theory of why  he cant be seen speaking! His animal is silent so he shall act as the animal! While i didnt manage to find out the doctors animal, cyan often represents emotional healing and mental clarity. And thats why he could just have been the doc!Soon, for the ticket taker i thought about dragonfly wings! Yes, the color isnt just blue but iit is mostly common and i thought of it bc of how they can blend in the inviorment. Plus, can the texture of their wings look like shattered glass! Now, for the jester it was hard but he kinda reminded me of the chesiere cat! mischievous, and kinda like a mysteri who still helps... just in a weird way. This is just my theory and you know, i kinda put in more than what you asked for but just incase people wondered about the eothers in my theory i put in them all! (also! @oreo_eater! Your thoughts are very intresting i must say!)

(1 edit) (+1)

I DIDN'T SEE THE RED PANDA COMING 😭🙏❤
I love how you're going with this; it kinda makes sense! Harlequin is 100% a serpent; bro's got the tongue and most symbolisms (even sxual desire 💀).
But Colombina actually means 'little dove', FYI, which represents innocence, new beginnings (hum hum, sacrifice) monogamy/love (explains why she didn't want to be with Harlequin since she is already with Pierrot).

(2 edits) (+2)

Yes so Harlequin does not feel JEALOUS but rather ENVIOUS, please remember that since it's very easy to confuse (even for me) and that would misinterpret Harlequin's whole character🙏
If it was JEALOUSY, it will mean that Harlequin loves Colombina and hates Pierrot because of that, but it's not the case*: It's ENVY as mentionned in the story: "...Who saw the light in the lover's eyes and felt envy gnawing [at] him from within." Harlequin felt envious of Pierrot since he didn't have what Pierrot did (i.e. Colombina's love and attention). He just couldn't sit with the reality that someone was happier and better than him so he wanted to take what Pierrot had. *He didn't care about Pierrot (for killing his love) nor Colombina (for killing her), he just wanted to have what he couldn't, and that made him happy to see that Pierrot is as miserable as him now. Harlequin is a pretty complex character for being Arlecchino. I wonder why is he so envious... Like leave my baby alone😭


Oh and about why Pierrot is not allowed to speak, it's because he's Pierrot! His attire might have been modernised but his role remains unchanged. Pierrot is a mime and mimes are famously known to imitate without the use of speech. So Pierrot has to remain silent to fulfill his role; it's as simple as that! But I do wonder if perhaps there is something else below the surface on why he cannot... Or maybe we're overthinking this!

(1 edit)

@cookieandcreaaam I thought about the red panda as a joke at first! But soon, it actaully kinda made sense! I started to laugh so hard bc of that! Ps.(To anybody) I really like speculating so i would really like to hear  everybodys thoughts, together we can TRY to solve this godamn puzzle. I wont reply immediatly but i will try as soon as possible.)

(+2)

Yess!! I feel like there should be a space where we can all theorise <3

(1 edit) (+1)

YES. Like I have so many questions and things to explore. I feel like there needs to be a dedicated space for fans to share theories or something. Because I seriously want to attempt to solve what's going on here.

(+1)

ME TOO! I'm really glad your started this out, btw ❤
There should be like a reddit post or a Discord server at this point

(+1)

Ong thanks for making that clear, also thanks for pointing out that we should take their roles into account as well. Like the fact the Pierrot is a Pierrot and Harlequin is a Harlequin and so on. Because these roles affect how they behave. I really wanna do a whole character analysis of literally all the main circus members we have met so far.

(1 edit) (+1)

You're welcome <3
Feel free to do so! I was really digging myself to see Neko's inspiration and perhaps predict the course of events thanks to how the story actually goes in the commedia dell'arte.

I love that we all have different thoughts and suchs! @oreo_eater6 and @cookieandcreaaam shall we then revisit this big speculation comments when day three arrive or when we think of a new theory?

(+1)

Of course of course! I'll be cooking up something in my own time ❤

(1 edit)

I thought about posting this so here it comes! when user was going to work they put on the tv and they talked about a person gone missing with only finding the bag of the owner. while that played user was trying to find their bag. Might be nothing but just wanted to say it incase somebody else thinks about a thing where user gets kidnapped or smth. 

one thing im wondering is why its only pierrot who has a different eye color/colour than the main color/colour? it just feels weird like there is some deeper meaning behind it. Maybe its a future thing for another character we will see idk. But i found it really funny when i drew my oc. I wanted my oc to be pierrot's little sister by two years and when i remembered that pierrot has yellow eyes and some yellow accsesiories i made my oc have red eyes with some accsesiories  and main color/colour as yellow! But i am genuenly wondering why it is like that. Does anybody have a theory?

Also english isnt my first language but i try to type as good as i can! (Im from Europe)

(1 edit) (+1)

The connection with MC's bag and what was said on TV is meant for the reader to draw a connection between the circus and the disappearances. It's kinda obvious now about what's happening with pink tickets (we had a whole bad ending telling us what it was) so I don't see a need in explaining. It's also quite clever haha.

Aww making OCs is great! But you are right about the eye colours... I have noticed this but never really thought about it. Most of them match with their outfit but Pierrot's is different from the start: it's supposed to be white but Neko decided to make it red, and the colour red is also for MC's name and sometimes for Doctor so I'm guessing to avoid confusion, it is yellow. I think it's mosly about design purposes and I can't see why it would hide a meaning... It's a pretty and fitting colour if I do say so myself. In fact, Neko has said that Pierrot's attire was actually different in the story but then it had to be changed.

Thanks for bringing this up! And do not worry about your English; you type pretty well ^^ (Hi fellow European!)