Yes, that's my intention. But getting into this discussion, have you ever stopped to think that even when we're not talking about AI, people, even great artists, create artistic works or art styles by being inspired by or learning techniques created by others who came before or who learned them before? Why is it so wrong for a machine to do the same?
And if you know how generative AI works, you'll understand that it doesn't simply copy and paste parts of existing images when creating a new one, but calculates and learns patterns, as humans normally do as well, but in a more limited way, prioritizing aspect over logic.
And let's observe that even if that were the case, "Collage" is also considered art.
I understand very well the frustration some people have about AI, or the fact that they don't like that people who don't know how to illustrate can also create something artistic (after all, those 10,000 people who played my game would never have had the chance to experience it if generative AI didn't exist). You can choose not to use it if you don't like it, and that's fine! But I can't understand this obsession with wanting to prohibit and demonize those who choose to use it honestly, especially in my case, where I usually generate the images and then spend 1 to 2 whole days just editing them in Photoshop to get them the way I want them for the game.
I'm not Activision or Ubisoft, you understand?
I don't want to cause a fuss or a fight, I just wanted to share my perspective on it, I hope you understand.