Hi @xzxixin,
Thank you for reporting the bug regarding card “33009” (Ricochet Beam) and “27078” (“Now We’re Angry!”). We have reproduced both cases, but we would like to reference a specific rule or FAQ that addresses these situations to confirm they are indeed bugs.
If you can provide any relevant rule or FAQ, it would be very helpful.
Thank you once again for your valuable feedback!
关于第一个bug的faq
Q：When playing an attack event with multiple instances of damage, like “Melee”, “Ricochet Beam” and “Royal Flush”, when do the Forced Responses on “Now we’re angry”, “Violent tendencies” and the Venom Villain, trigger? And how many times would Venom’s Forced Response trigger with Ricochet Beam or Royal Flush if all instances of damage were directed at Venom?
A：Attack events targeting the same enemy with multiple instances of damage should be considered “a single attack”, and the Forced Responses on the encounter cards mentioned should be resolved after the entire attack event resolves. (Except for the few attack events that explicitly state they are multiple attacks.)
For instance, you could target the villain with Royal Flush, dealing 1 -> 1 -> 1 damage, and then resolve the Forced Response on Violent Tendencies to discard it because “that attack dealt 3 damage.”
-Alex – April 21, 2023
关于第2个bug，OVERKILL规则第1段提到：
If an ally is dealt any amount of excess damage by an attack with the overkill keyword, simultaneously deal damage equal to the excess amount to the identity of the player who controls the ally.
溢伤是在攻击造成伤害时触发，在ATTACK (ENEMY ACTIVATION)的步骤表中应为第4步（Deal damage from the attack equal to the attacking enemy’s modified ATK value），增效异能在步骤3b步（Resolve any “Boost” abilities, indicated by the star icon in the boost area），所以增效异能先翻开现在我们生气了，后面计算造成伤害时，本次攻击已经有了溢伤。
